@neologist,
neologist wrote:
I hate to get away from Romeo bashing, as much fun as it may be.
But, Frank.
Even nominal christians like Romeo do not follow the law. But the law is still of the utmost importance because it highlights God's standards and focuses attention on the life and work of Jesus. By fulfilling every aspect of the law, he was able to remove its rule over us.
A good thing, too. I'd have been stoned as a teenager for sure.
Romeo is fun...and I actually appreciate his running into brick walls to entertain us.
Anyway...I have given (in the linked thread) a fairly detailed explanation of why I think the law does apply to modern Christians...even though I totally understand why they want to be free of it. If the truth be told, I suspect they want to be as far from the god Jesus worshiped as possible also.
But the question posed in the OP is worth considering.
IF THERE IS A GOD LIKE THE ONE YOU WORSHIP...why doesn't that god simply "show its face?" Why not reveal itself in an unambiguous way to everyone...and require of humans whatever it wants to require?
We won't lose our "free will"...we could still decide to "obey"...or we could decide to "do what we want instead."
Now don't get me wrong...I can come up with "reasons" "excuses" or "rationalizations" with the best of apologists.
But the bottom line is that one reason...perhaps a very compelling reason...
...is that there is no god of that kind in existence.
It is possible.
Most theists cannot even acknowledge the possibility.
Can you, Neo?
Can you say "It is possible there is no GOD of the kind I 'believe' exists"...in a way that actually acknowledges that you see the possibility?