Do we really have to take military action to Syria?

Does anyone else have a better plan than that one, that will Peacefully disarm the World of weapons of mass destruction?

Should we carry have car insurance even if we think we are good drivers?
Should any Nation have any responsibility if they use a weapon of mass destruction? If there is an accident how long should the victim of the accident wait for any assistance? What if the Nation that used the weapon of mass destruction don't have the funds assist the victim?

Well is a fairly simple thing. Simply getting all the Nations to agree that they should be responsible for their weapons of mass destruction. All Nations vote that they have to carry insurance for any liabilities while possessing a weapon of mass destruction. Why would a Nation oppose carrying liability for their weapon of mass destruction?

It has stopped being a wish...and has become a fantasy.

This is not going to happen.

If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.
International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945, Dept. of State Pub.No. 3080 (1949), p.330.

Would you oppose it? Could you give a reason why you would oppose it?

Nations will still have to work out their differences, they will just have to find other ways besides using weapons of mass destruction to accomplish that

We must make clear to the Germans that the wrong for which their fallen leaders are on trial is not that they lost the war, but that they started it. And we must not allow ourselves to be drawn into a trial of the causes of the war, for our position is that no grievances or policies will justify resort to aggressive war. It is utterly renounced and condemned as an instrument of policy.
Statement by Justice Jackson on War Trials Agreement (August 12, 1945).

The privilege of opening the first trial in history for crimes against the peace of the world imposes a grave responsibility. The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating, that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored, because it cannot survive their being repeated. That four great nations, flushed with victory and stung with injury stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captive enemies to the judgment of the law is one of the most significant tributes that Power has ever paid to Reason.
Opening Address to the International Military Tribunal at the Nuremberg Trials (November 10, 1945).

If we can cultivate in the world the idea that aggressive war-making is the way to the prisoner's dock rather than the way to honors, we will have accomplished something toward making the peace more secure.
Opening Address to the International Military Tribunal at the Nuremberg Trials (November 10, 1945).