HAPPY D-DAY, EVERYONE !

@spendius,

Addressing the concept insofar as it connotes hatred,
it is my opinion that its un-wise to carry hatred around; unpaid work.

In my youth, I remember my impassioned hatred of Roosevelt and the kennedys.
In retrospect, I don't believe that carrying that burden was worth it.
After Clinton was elected, I did not get emotionally involved,
tho too many of my friends were rather frantic in their opposition.
I did get a few chuckles from his misadventures with Monica.
Impeachment can be fun.

David

2 Replies

http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r147/panzade/yawning_zps95e04adc.gif

Another thread destroyed by I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I?

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Impeachment can be fun

Acquittal can be "funner"

Dave, How tall are you?

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I did get a few chuckles from his misadventures with Monica.

All he did was get jizz on her dress. Which she didn't mind. He didn't get the USA involved in a stupid war.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

People can change their minds.

Indeed. And they did so and do so.
But not the SA.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

U dispute that the S.A. were recruited with socialistic ideas ?

Yes. And that is backed to 100% by sources.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

DAVID wrote:

Impeachment can be fun

farmerman wrote:

Acquittal can be "funner"

Did u THANK US, for the opportunity
we presented u for all that fun?? Huh, did u ?

Did u send Rush a "thank u" note ?

David

0 Replies

@contrex,

contrex wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:
I did get a few chuckles from his misadventures with Monica.

All he did was get jizz on her dress. Which she didn't mind. He didn't get the USA involved in a stupid war.

He committed perjury, which is a federal felony.
There were a few other counts in the bill of impeachment.

We thawt that he disgraced the office.

2 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:
People can change their minds.

Indeed. And they did so and do so.
But not the SA.

OmSigDAVID wrote:
U dispute that the S.A. were recruited with socialistic ideas ?

Yes. And that is backed to 100% by sources.

Please explain.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Please explain.

Sources in the meaning like historians talk about it.
For instance the statutes of the SA; reports, printed and oral, about their meetings; reports, printed and oral, what they did and how they acted.

Between 1918 and 1925 there have been uncounted "battles" (in streets and pubs and meeting halls) all over Germany between the SA on the one side and the Roter Frontkämpfer-Bund RFB ("Alliance of Red Front-Fighters", mainly Communists and other left-wings) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold ("Black, Red, Gold Banner of the Reich", mainly Social-Democrats, Catholic Zentrum Party and other other republicans) on the other ... ... ...

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

He committed perjury, which is a federal felony.

That has got to be one of the funniest things I`ve ever heard.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

It was my understanding that the S.A. was recruited from the German poor,
with socialistic enticements.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Well, you certainly got the wrong idea.

In it's very first days, the SA was called "S.S." (Saalschutz, 'stewards to keep order at indoor events'). It's member were mainly ex-servicemen of the Reichswehr and from the freecorps, under the 'command' of ex-officers.

It's only purpose was to fight the Communists and Social-Democrats.

1 Reply

@Walter Hinteler,

Thank u for that information, Walter.

0 Replies

@Setanta,

Setanta wrote:

Your "values" brand you a bigot. That you glory in that is an
inescapable symbol of your hateful nature. That's not something i have to live with.

We may infer that Setanta 'd have applied
a DIFFERENT philosophy to the predicament
of the opinionated Viking (whose existence he so adamantly denies).
From his posts, presumably, Setanta 'd get all smoochy with the Royal Foot.
"This Royal piggy went to market. . . ." [smooch, no bigot HE!]

0 Replies

How pathetically childish of you . . . tell us again how highly you value civility . . . while you puke up playground insults.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

He committed perjury,

What was the perjury? Your saying he committed perjury proves nothing.

1 Reply

@Setanta,

Setanta wrote:

How pathetically childish of you . . .
tell us again how highly you value civility . . . while you puke up playground insults.

U may have a point there, Setanta; kind of counter-insults.
Its just so much fun to rankle u, in recognition of your chronic caustic pomposity.

( Notice that Setanta chose to avoid the question,
focusing his attention instead on my conduct,
as distinct from his osculatory adventures with the Royal Foot.

Wud Setanta be enuf of a man? or not??
Will the answer remain forever shrouded in mystery,
or
will Setanta reveal the answer? )

1 Reply

@spendius,

DAVID wrote:

He committed perjury,

spendius wrote:

What was the perjury? Your saying he committed perjury proves nothing.

I was not expecting that to be challenged.
It was conspicuous at the time. I 'm much too lazy to research it
to refresh my memory. I have no need of impeaching Clinton again.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Chronic caustic pompostiy . . . now there's a wonderful description of how you post. You just which you could succeed in "rankling" me . . . dream on . . .

1 Reply

@Setanta,

Setanta wrote:

Chronic caustic pompostiy . . .
now there's a wonderful description of how you post.

What was it that little children used to say in that vein ?

Setanta wrote:

You just which you could succeed in "rankling" me . . . dream on . . .

You just "which", huh ??

0 Replies

HAPPY D-DAY, EVERYONE !

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know