@NealNealNeal,
Some people say that my logic is wrong because I utilise all 4 off logic output possibilities rather than just the 2 off logic output possibilities of 0,1 and 1,0 or good is bad and bad is good.I disagree with them clearly.
I agree with you that Christians are not better than other people.
If good is bad and bad is good logic is adopted then there is a RULES output requirement or society would fall apart.
If good is good and bad is bad then there is a RULES output requirement or society would fall apart.
The common denominator here is a definite need for RULES in both scenarios which is interesting.
The Christian claim is that RULES have always been in place because there is a difference between good and bad even though this difference is based upon an assumption.
The non Christian claim is that RULES haven’t always been in place because there isn’t a difference between good and bad even though this non difference is based upon an assumption.
Just picking up on the Christian claim again… I stand by my statement that the Christian is no better off than the non Christian if there is a difference between good and bad and that difference is defined by a RULES output.
As I see it, neither the Christian or the Non Christian can keep the Christian rules perfectly and so both would come before a judge just as we see in society when man doesn’t keep the non Christian rules perfectly.
Therefore, in what way is the Christian better off than the non Christian as they both would have to stand before a RULE judge?
That is why I say the Christian rules must point to something else.