@The Anointed,
Quote:“But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them….” (2 Peter 2:1-3).
Which is more important?
That God was born in human flesh, lived and died on the cross? That God was incarnate, through Jesus? That God so loved the world that he gave his only son?
Or that Jesus was male, even if to do so, you invalidate the Gospel by introducing a human father? That you deny the concept of being born as God's child, instead focusing on some nonsense that baptism creates inheritance. Okay then, why aren't all of us able to walk on water after being baptised?
There's a very simple answer. Baptism ISN'T about inheritance. It's about our commitment to God. Jesus's ministry began with his baptism, but his powers were inborn as was his relationship with God. Joseph is told by an angel not to divorce Mary, and both Joseph and the Wise Men are informed of Herod's plans. The Wise Men are led by a star. Shepherds are told about this kid by angels. This is not a normal kid with normal parents, this is a special child from the onset.
Jesus was able to do miracles BEFORE being baptised, as he did with changing water into wine.
In fact, if the Infancy Gospels are to believed (I tend not to, as these are largely just stories without good theological framework), he did a number of miracles as a child. The problem with these were they weren't to heal or for the glory of God, but just a kid playing around. What do I mean? Well part of the reason the Infancy Gospels are never canon is because they have Jesus making literal clay sparrows, they have him cursing a kid to death who upsets him, they have him helping with carpentry by stretching the wood, and resurrecting a few people. None of these are particularly religious signs, and they don't follow Jesus's mission to heal and spread the good news. They do kinda get better as they go along though.
https://www.gotquestions.org/Infancy-Gospel-of-Thomas.html
The point being, I would sooner accept these writings than the idea of Jesus as a totally normal child (which flies in the face of literally the first few chapters of all the Gospels) until God says those words in baptism.
I have been in baptisms. What is emphasized is the parent's commitment and the person's commitment to do good and resist evil. Baptism is a sign of grace from Jesus. It is a sign of our own commitment, and it is a sign or new life with God. But nowhere in the ceremony does it mention anything about becoming a child of God. It's about instruction of the child and membership in the Church, the body of Christ. This baptism is fairly standard.
https://www.rca.org/liturgy/order-for-the-sacrament-of-baptism/