11
   

Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night?

 
 
JTT
 
  0  
Wed 1 May, 2013 09:02 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Hell an individual that had also been willing to placed a bomb in a crowd by an eight year old child and set if off as soon as he got to a safe distant.


Why are you such a hypocrite, Bill?

Quote:
A second candidate for most extreme act of Mideast international terrorism in the peak year of 1985 is a car-bombing in Beirut on March 8 that killed 80 people and wounded 256. The bomb was placed outside a Mosque, timed to explode when worshippers left. "About 250 girls and women in flowing black chadors, pouring out of Friday prayers at the Imam Rida Mosque, took the brunt of the blast," Nora Boustany reported. The bomb also "burned babies in their beds," killed children "as they walked home from the mosque," and "devastated the main street of the densely populated" West Beirut suburb. The target was a Shi'ite leader accused of complicity in terrorism, but he escaped. The crime was organized by the CIA and its Saudi clients with the assistance of British intelligence.

NOTE{Boustany, _Washington Post Weekly_, March 14, 1988; Bob Woodward, _Veil_ (Simon & Schuster, 1987, 396f.).}
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 1 May, 2013 10:19 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
don't have a gun, I don't want one, nor do I need one. You're the one who has made sure you're equipped to go on a shooting spree.


LOL if a proven cold blooded killer, of even an 8 years old child, on the run from the police such as the young "gentleman' we been talking about would break into your home looking for shelter and hostages you might change your mind about your not needing a gun.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Wed 1 May, 2013 10:57 pm
@BillRM,
I wonder how many "cold blooded killers" with a gun or without a gun will come to their home in their lifetime? ZERO? Mr. Green

Some people's own fears and imagination is their worst enemy. They are the same people who kill their own family member through violence, commit suicide, or accidently shoot a family member.

More likely than that "cold blooded killer" visiting their home.
BillRM
 
  3  
Wed 1 May, 2013 11:43 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
I wonder how many "cold blooded killers" with a gun or without a gun will come to their home in their lifetime? ZERO?

Some people's own fears and imagination is their worst enemy. They are the same people who kill their own family member through violence, commit suicide, or accidently shoot a family member.

More likely than that "cold blooded killer" visiting their home.


Well we just had a middle size city on the east coast of the US where every household was at some risk of having a proven cold blooded killer visiting them.

Yes he did picked a boat in a back yard and not a household but that was more luck then anything else and perhaps fear that he would end up facing an armed household.

Next for myself in my life time I and somewhere around 30,000 plus others in my community of south Dade county had been in a situation where neither the police or the fire department was available to me fully for months of end.

No way to call the police to come and deal with a crime or the fire department to deal with either a fire or a medical emergency. You and your neighbors was on your own

Hell I did stop a looter myself from carrying properties out of my home at gun point during that period of no police being available.

We do not live in a world where at all times you can depend on the public services being available and as a results firearms can be a life saver.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 2 May, 2013 01:29 am
@BillRM,
Nobody would be stupid enough to break into my house.

What is it about you and 8 year old children? Are you trying to get your story straight already? You've got an explanation for him being in your house, now you just need one to explain why he was repeatedly sodomised.
McTag
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2013 05:54 am
@BillRM,

Quote:
To sum up there is no moral problem or legal problem in using deadly force


To you, Bill. To you.
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 06:13 am
@McTag,
Quote:
To you, Bill. To you.


Not only to myself but to the law and anyone with any common sense also.

You do not have any obligation to have yourself or your family harmed or killed by a cold blooded killer.

But if you wish instead to put the life and welfare of such a killer ahead of yourself and your family feel free to do so.

It take a man of real "morals" to allow himself let alone his wife and children to be put at risk for the benefit of such a person as the younger Boston bomber.
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 06:23 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
What is it about you and 8 year old children


The eight year old child comment came from the fact that there is videos of the younger bomber placing his bomb right by an eight year old boy watching the run and who was one of those who happen to had died from the blast.

Quote:
You've got an explanation for him being in your house, now you just need one to explain why he was repeatedly sodomised.


Interesting if very sick comment concerning the youngest victim of the Boston bombers that in my opinion said one hell of a lot about what kind of a "man" you happen to be.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 06:48 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
What is it about you and 8 year old children


The eight year old child comment came from the fact that there is videos of the younger bomber placing his bomb right by an eight year old boy watching the run and who was one of those who happen to had died from the blast.

Quote:
You've got an explanation for him being in your house, now you just need one to explain why he was repeatedly sodomised.


Interesting if very sick comment concerning the youngest victim of the Boston bombers that in my opinion said one hell of a lot about what kind of a "man" you happen to be.


Jizzy is a sick and perverted piece of human excrement, ignore her.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2013 08:06 am
@BillRM,

In most developed (Ist-World) countries, if you threatened an unarmed (and wounded) man and then shot him, you would be in deep doo-doo with the law, irrespective of what you believed he was guilty of at the time.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 08:30 am
@McTag,



This particular wounded and possibly unarmed man happened to be an Islamic Jihadist terrorist bomber. He and his brother killed several Americans, wounded many others and threatened an entire geographic area. Threatening and shooting this piece of **** should earn the shooter the medal of honor.
oralloy
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 08:36 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
In most developed (Ist-World) countries, if you threatened an unarmed (and wounded) man and then shot him, you would be in deep doo-doo with the law,

The rules for you serfs may be different than the rules for us free men.

Here, if there is a reasonable reason to believe that someone is an imminent threat, it is OK to neutralize the threat.


McTag wrote:
irrespective of what you believed he was guilty of at the time.

What does guilt or innocence have to do with anything?
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 08:49 am
@McTag,
I
Quote:
n most developed (Ist-World) countries, if you threatened an unarmed (and wounded) man


The fact that he was wounded in a gun battle where he had try to kill more police officers would give him protections from being capture or threatened by a citizen in your country how very very very very strange.

An how would you know if he was then unarmed until you have him in control?

Until he could be checked for bombs and firearms you would not, at least unless you was crazy, assume he happen to be unarmed IE no gun and had ran out of bombs and did not have a suicide vest like his brother and so on.

Can not off hand think of a more dangerous person to run into in your back yard wounded or not wounded by police fire.

I am assuming hopefully that you are the one that happen to be insane not the nation you are living in and a mass killer wounded or not wounded could be threaten in order to capture him and end his threat to the society.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 09:05 am
@McTag,
Well there you go McTag. This is the Wild Wild West...Yeeeha!

Better be careful if you visit.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 09:08 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

This is the Wild Wild West...Yeeeha!

Better be careful if you visit.


Be careful out there, bad guys are everywhere.
http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/86500/Outlaw-Barack-Obama--86812.jpg
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 09:09 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Well there you go McTag. This is the Wild Wild West...Yeeeha!

Better be careful if you visit.


Well I am not sure I would care to visit any nation where a mass killer/cop killer have the protections Mctag is claiming he would enjoy.

Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Thu 2 May, 2013 09:32 am
@BillRM,
Come now Bill, McTag writes of enlightened lands, in which civilized people treat each other in civilized ways. Only the unsophisticated have anything to fear in such wonderful places, and if the odd sophisticate comes to harm at the hands of a criminal, well, it's karmic retribution for not being forceful enough in establishing a truly utopian society where the wretched who turn to crime are not an entirely unknown quantity. Either that or it's just his bad luck for becoming a character in the woeful tale of the poor bugger treated shabbily by society.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2013 10:25 am
@BillRM,
You wrote,
Quote:
Well we just had a middle size city on the east coast of the US where every household was at some risk of having a proven cold blooded killer visiting them.


"We had?" Tell us, what was the ratio per 100,000 households in that east coast city where a "cold blooded killer visited them?"

Please name that city, and a reliable source that proves your point.

Otherwise, you're just whistling dixie; just tune, no content.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Thu 2 May, 2013 10:59 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Well we just had a middle size city on the east coast of the US where every household was at some risk of having a proven cold blooded killer visiting them.


"proven" - another shining example of that good old respect for the rule of law that is soooo American.

"some risk" - you have been turned into quaking little chickenshits by your governments constant barrage of propaganda. Aimed at empty headed little children.

What color is your "terrorist threat" threat at today, "hot pink"?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2013 02:31 pm
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:

Fellow Humans: How many of us wish that Nate Bell would drink a big can of Shut the **** Up?
The same number who wish that the First Amendment
and the Second Amendment woud disappear. That's how many.





David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.71 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 07:39:06