6
   

Should "one victims' legs" be "one of victims' legs"?

 
 
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 11:11 am

Context:
The description of the devices coincides with observations earlier by Dr. George Velmahos, chief of trauma surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital, who said most of the injuries were "traumatic amputations," in which the blasts nearly blew off one victims' legs.

More:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-explosions/2086853/
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
oristarA
 
  4  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 11:15 am
@mark noble,
mark noble wrote:

Should be, ' ARE YOU MAD?'


Darling, are you Miss HighSea who used to be mad at me? Razz
engineer
 
  4  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 11:20 am
@oristarA,
No, it should be "one victim's legs" with one refering to victim.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  2  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 01:33 pm
@mark noble,
Drunk again, eh Mark?
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 01:51 pm
No. It's referring to both legs of one victim. The punctuation is incorrect. It should be "victim's."
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 05:02 pm
Eh? What a harsher reality.
God bless him/her.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 05:08 pm
@oristarA,
one of victim's legs is not possible in any collocation that comes to mind, Ori.

one of the victim's

one of many victims

one of a group of victims
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 06:18 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

one of victim's legs is not possible in any collocation that comes to mind, Ori.

one of the victim's

one of many victims

one of a group of victims


Yeah, like the USAToday's reporter, sometimes you're not aware of how ridiculous you are until a calm analysis blows off your fantasy. Razz
0 Replies
 
mark noble
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 06:22 pm
@oristarA,
"Darling"?
Really?

Well "Luv" No.

And ' one victims' legs ' is correct grammar, when referring
to the legs of 'one victim'.
mark noble
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 06:23 pm
@roger,
Why else would I venture herein?
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  2  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 06:40 pm
@mark noble,
mark noble wrote:

"Darling"?
Really?

Well "Luv" No.

And ' one victims' legs ' is correct grammar, when referring
to the legs of 'one victim'.


I call Miss HighSea darling, not you, an ill-humored rascal.
' one victims' legs ' is not grammatically correct. Its apostrophe has been misplaced.



mark noble
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 06:56 pm
@oristarA,
Wrong Luv!
Is acceptable as a possessive either way - victim's or victims'.

TOUCHY and SNARKY, eh LUV?
fckoff sadact.
oristarA
 
  3  
Reply Tue 16 Apr, 2013 08:15 pm
@mark noble,
mark noble wrote:

Wrong Luv!
Is acceptable as a possessive either way - victim's or victims'.

TOUCHY and SNARKY, eh LUV?
fckoff sadact.


Can "one victims" stand in your logic? You grammatical imposter! Cool
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Should "one victims' legs" be "one of victims' legs"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 02:13:45