31
   

Guns And The Laws That Govern Them

Forums: Gun Control, Gun-Control, 2nd-Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Gun Debate
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 12:56 pm
@RexRed,
Hey Rex. Here are some stories for you to read.

Defensive gun use:

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=9157481
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 01:01 pm
@RexRed,
Store owner who was beaten in 2011 by crooks was ready this time:

http://www.eagletribune.com/local/x1307055470/Liquor-store-owner-badly-beaten-in-2011-thwarts-another-robbery
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 01:06 pm
@RexRed,
Woman who was home alone as 3 men tried to break into her house:

http://www.kctv5.com/story/22407866/shots-fired-during-home-invasion-1-person-possibly-shot
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 01:08 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

Did I say they were committing a crime?

The person you are defending did so.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 01:09 pm
@RexRed,
Grandson defends his elderly grandmother from repeat break-ins.

http://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/index.ssf/2013/05/police_man_shoots_suspect_paro.html#incart_river_default
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 02:45 pm
@parados,
I wasn't defending anyone, I was making my own comment. You seem to think the Constitution was written so that the govt could prevent us from doing things, when that wasn't the case. The Constitution was written to restrict the govt not the people. Plain and simple.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Jul, 2013 02:53 pm

As water constitutes ice,
so the Constitution constitutes government in America.
Government was granted EXISTENCE subject to
certain considerations, including specific areas of authority
that were WITHHELD from it, e.g. choosing our religions for us
or interfering with our possession of defensive guns.

The USSC has repeatedly held that government has NO
jurisdiction other than that which has been granted to it.

(See also the 9th and 10th Amendments.)





David
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 3 Jul, 2013 07:00 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

I wasn't defending anyone, I was making my own comment. You seem to think the Constitution was written so that the govt could prevent us from doing things, when that wasn't the case. The Constitution was written to restrict the govt not the people. Plain and simple.

You seem to make up whatever you want and not actually comment on what people are saying.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 3 Jul, 2013 07:02 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Since the government has no jurisdiction where it isn't granted and since "crime" is a violation of government laws can you show us where the constitution gives the government the power to charge a crime for the government passing legislation.


Or are you just going to keep waving your pecker around?
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 3 Jul, 2013 10:54 am
@parados,
So first I was defending someone, and now I'm just making things up? Which is it Parados? Am I wrong in my statement that the Constitution is there to restrict the govt and not the people?
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 3 Jul, 2013 11:48 am
@parados,
parados wrote:
Since the government has no jurisdiction where it isn't granted
and since "crime" is a violation of government laws can you show us
where the constitution gives the government the power to charge
a crime for the government passing legislation.
U call upon me to be REDUNDANT
in citing u to Title 18, US Code
Chapter 13, Sections 241 and 242.
Do u impugn the jurisdictional predicate
of that statute ??



parados wrote:
Or are you just going to keep waving your pecker around?
It seems odd to me (tho I do not object
to homosexuality in others) that liberals so obsessively
pursue an interest in the penises of real Americans.
The wish to survive the predatory violence of man or beast is non-erotic.





David
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Jul, 2013 05:31 am
A fireworks dynasty shoots for redemption after one bad blowup
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/fireworks-dynasty-shoots-redemption-after-one-bad-blowup-6C10523874

http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/streams/2013/July/130703/6C8141165-130703-coslog-fireworks2.blocks_desktop_medium.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Jul, 2013 07:22 am
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/942093_681517555208228_812329806_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Jul, 2013 05:29 pm
@Baldimo,
You made 2 statements. They both did different things.
First you jumped in to defend David. Then you made up something you "seem to think" I said but I clearly never did say.
Does that explain your actions? Or do you still need help?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Jul, 2013 05:33 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Do u impugn the jurisdictional predicate
of that statute ??
You are the one claiming some of the US Code is a crime. I am asking for your showing that supports your statement.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

It seems odd to me (tho I do not object
to homosexuality in others) that liberals so obsessively
pursue an interest in the penises of real Americans.
The wish to survive the predatory violence of man or beast is non-erotic.





David

You are the one that brought up peckers around when you claimed others were "raping" the Constitution. I am merely pointing out you are the one that is waving your pecker around and no one else is raping the Constitution because your argument is silly and unsupported by reality when there exists a law for almost 80 years which you claim can't exist under your idiotic statements.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Jul, 2013 07:18 am
Watch as California fireworks display fires sideways into crowd
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/05/watch-as-california-fireworks-display-fires-sideways-into-crowd/
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 8 Jul, 2013 12:04 pm
@RexRed,
Hey Rex no comment on the defensive gun use links?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Jul, 2013 05:59 am
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/934991_519818631418274_1531430362_n.jpg
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 9 Jul, 2013 09:15 am
@RexRed,
Got any stat's to back this up?

Besides there is already a law preventing people with domestic violence backgrounds from having a gun. It is called the Lautenberg rule and it effects everyone but especially those in the military and law enforcement.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Aug, 2013 04:22 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/994546_715097425184000_1902180495_n.jpg
 

Related Topics

NRA: Arm the Blind! - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Thoughts on gun control..? - Discussion by komr98
The Gun Fight in Washington. Your opinons? - Question by Lustig Andrei
Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn - Discussion by tsarstepan
Gun control... - Question by Cyracuz
Does gun control help? - Discussion by Fatal Freedoms
Why Every Woman Should Carry a Gun - Discussion by cjhsa
Game over for gun controls in any country in the world - Discussion by BillRM
Congress Acts to Defend Gun Rights - Discussion by oralloy
Texas follows NY Newspaper's lead - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Guns And The Laws That Govern Them
  3. » Page 8
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 03:50:22
▲ ▼