@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
A family was returning home from a funeral when a masked
and armed robber approached them in the driveway of one of their
houses in Harris County, Texas and demanded cash. The brother-in-law
of the homeowner, a retired federal agent, responded to the threat
by drawing a gun and firing at the robber, striking him twice
and causing him to flee. The robber was captured a short time later
after seeking treatment at a nearby hospital.
The retired agent’s actions seem to have inspired at least one of his
brother-in-law’s neighbors who told a local media outlet, “I might
start taking gun classes for protection.” Investigators believe the
thief may have been involved in other robberies earlier in the evening.
(KHOU, Houston, Texas 09/16/13)
Unfortunately that neighbor is much more likely to shoot someone in his own family...than any intruder.
I doubt that,
but even if that were true,
the right of self-defense remains
immutable.
Frank Apisa wrote:So what is your point, David?
It's better to
HAVE a gun and not need it
than it is to
NEED a gun and not have it.
Every citizen of our 3OO,OOO,OOO + shud be well armed
in his or her own defense 24/7/365.
The only exceptions to that are criminals while incarcerated
and mentally sick people while thay are confined to mental hospitals.
Note that I advocate that when violent criminals
are released from prison, thay
not be released inside America.
David