Isn't this obviously an act of terrorism? H2oman is apparently happy that the unsubstantiated rumors are of a "Saudi" terrorist suspect rather than a Tea Party terrorist suspect.
I am just pointing out that H2oman might just be jumping the gun given the fact that this is an unsubstantiated rumor. But I don't see how it would matter to anyone sane what kind of terrorist it is.
A planned bombing attack on innocent civilians is terrorism no matter who the culprit is.
I don't argue re it being terrorism - that is highly likely. As for the culprit, though, there were reports that were all over the place and I don't think anything re identities, etc. has been confirmed.
0 Replies
H2O MAN
0
Reply
Mon 15 Apr, 2013 05:54 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:
Isn't this obviously an act of terrorism? H2oman is apparently happy that the unsubstantiated rumors are of a "Saudi" terrorist suspect rather than a Tea Party terrorist suspect.
Maxdancona is a coward that can't accept the truth.
Max is happy when the blood of innocents is flowing in our streets.
Max is suffering from a severe case of rectal cranial inversion.
What truth can't I accept H2oMan? It seems to me that no one here knows the truth here. I am just suggesting that it doesn't really matter who the terrorist turns out to be.
Nev' mind, I see the other age appropriate thread, and joe's there.
Adios.
0 Replies
maxdancona
-2
Reply
Mon 15 Apr, 2013 06:17 pm
@chai2,
This is a ******* troll thread designed to celebrate the rumors of the "Saudi terrorist". Everyone who participates in this thread, and I include myself and the people who are ironically calling for the rest of us to grow up, is acting like an idiot.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace