Please edit it

Edit it to what end, Ori? Is this a conversation between two people, a newspaper report, an academic paper, ... ?

A: I thought the point was that North Korea was advising foreigners in Seoul that they might not be safe because a missile might land there.

B: Earlier reporters all said NK warned foreigners in Pyongyang, not Seoul. The reason is simple: foreigners in Pyongyang are easy to inform, while the latter hard or impossible. Besides, NK threatens to attack US cities including Austin, [of] Texas, so why doesn't NK inform foreigners in United States to evacuate, saying it can't guarantee their safety? Because there's no need to, except for the foreigners who/that are in NK capital since a US counterattack will/would be immediate and inevitable.