Is Atheism More Likely To Be True Than Deism?

No, that's not true at all. In the first place, you have an insignificant sample. The people you talk to here do not represent even a tiny fraction of a percent of all the atheists in the United States, let alone the world.

I've never accepted the term rejection. That's another typical case of you framing things in your terms, rather than the terms used by the persons to whom you are talking. I can't reject anything unless it's being forced on me. Is that how you see your role in the world, to attempt to force your beliefs on others? Atheism is the lack of a belief, it shouldn't even be described as an "ism.." Sure, there are some idiots who state categorically that there is no god. They do not represent the majority of atheists, and in my experience, don't even represent a significant fraction of atheists. This is just like that time you puked up that bullshit about atheists being willing to believe if they had a sign from god. You never came up with the evidence for that bullshit. I strongly suspect that one or two people had demanded evidence, and you translated that in your fevered imagination into a call for a sign from god.

Same thing with this rejection bullshit of yours. You restate what others say in your own terms and then rant about that. You don't know enough atheists to be able to make confident statements about them. Not that you let a little ting like ignorance stand in your way.

This atheist see no reason at all to grant any of the current major religion belief systems any more credit then the tooth fairy.

So you admit that the tooth fairy has a possibility of existence?

Based upon what you have said...you neither know a fraction of atheists, or theists in the World....So why don't you just leave them all alone and go your own way?

If atheism is actually a belief

If it is not a belief, but a rejection

Accepting that agnosticism is the default position of science with respect to the possibility of most things (including god), shouldn't atheism nevertheless be considered the likelier conclusion when compared to deism?

How could it possibly be?

If atheism is actually a belief...atheism can not be proven just like a God in theism's can not...

Straw man. I only rant about the idiot theists who show up here, or the expressed beliefs of theists. I don't assign allegations of beliefs to theists and then rant at them for that. That's what you do with atheists, though.

I don't care if you link those posts or not. I long ago came to the conclusion that you were peddling bullshit.

Anyone asking for a sign from god is not an atheist, and any atheist (or so-called atheist) asking for evidence is not asking for a sign from god.

You don't seem to be able to absorb that. Frankly, i've always thought you were lying about it anyway.

Spare me the heroic stance, that's bullshit, too. I haven't said that other so-called atheists are idiots for saying that no god exists.

I accept that most of the world considers them atheists, although i personally consider them to be anti-theists rather than atheists.

A- as a combining form means without, nothing more. Anti- means opposed to or denying, which is what the so-called strong atheists are engaged in.

You certainly are not obliged to prove anything.

You certainly also have no refuge if you are dismissed for making claims you can't or won't prove.

Once again, i've been convinced from the beginning that you're a liar.

What an incredible idiot. Thomas is the only reliable source on what he believes or disbelieves and why. You are truly incoherent.

What would you say if you claim to reject all of these things and God...and I turned it around and asked you to provide me with factual evidence to support all of the claims you have made?

I don't "constantly continue to bring it up." This is the first time i've mentioned it in quite a long time.

What a little whiner you are.

You believe or reject routine is pretty tedious--and it's a perfect example of your incoherence. Once again, i don't continue to bring this up--whiner.

This the first time i've mentioned it in a long, long time.

Yes, i'm convinced you're lying about it, but this is the first time i've said as much, at least as far as i recall.

If you don't know what the word personally means, you really have no business in such a discussion.

That's correct, i am not what is called a strong atheist.

It's also correct that you don't have to prove anything.

If you make a claim, and provide no proof, you should accept that people will tell you that you're bullshitting.

I no more "continue" to engage with you than i "continue" to bring up your big lie.

Mostly, i ignore you.

Every once in a while, though, i consider it worth the time and effort to point out that you're a bullshit artists who shoots his mouth off about things he knows nothing about.