@farmerman,
DAVID wrote:The Authors simply chose to explicitly deprive government
of any jurisdiction qua civilian gun possession
farmerman wrote: As you know it wsnt even close to unanimous at the framers conventions.
The Bill of Rights passed; it was
ENACTED.
It
IS the Supreme Law of the Land.
It
cripples the jurisdiction of our low-life employee: government.
(Liberty and jurisdiction are
INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL.)
farmerman wrote:The framers just show us that they are only human with the same inabilities to think things out clearly as any of the rest of us.
As I said many times, itll be many generations but Im sure the reality of douche bag gun ownership will finally sink in. (AND of course, it wont have anything to do with "liberty")
That is
incoherent.
Maybe u 've been drinking ?
farmerman wrote:Youre a libertarian and I understand where you start at.
YES! LIBERTY is what counts;
THAT 'S what is
important.
Everything else is secondary, or tertiary or less important.
farmerman wrote:Besides an unlimited right to brandish and kill,
You really don't give a **** about safety, clean water, air and safe food as well.
SO arguing with you is like arguing with a block of pine.
Classic case!!!!! That 's what thay told us in school.
If thay cant handle the message, then thay 'll strike out
ad hominem and
ad equus against the messenger
and the horse he rode in on!!! The farmer proves it. Thank u.
David