What is the point to 'SATAN'

@mark noble,

Maybe someday you'll tell the rest of us what the **** you're talking about, you sad, silly and quite abysmally stupid asshole?

2 Replies

@Lustig Andrei,

And maybe someday.........I wont:)

0 Replies

@Lustig Andrei,

Might I point out that you behave oddly?, you clearly have questions for people that you do not ask, IMO, you presume hostility about issues will arise, questions are questions to almost everyone..
On the other hand , very amusing. For some old fark .. Perhaps not farker (witness my mercy).. You betray yourself today.

1 Reply

@nothingtodo,

nothingtodo wrote:

Might I point out that you behave oddly?, you clearly have questions for people that you do not ask, IMO, you presume hostility about issues will arise, questions are questions to almost everyone..
On the other hand , very amusing. For some old fark .. Perhaps not farker (witness my mercy).. You betray yourself today.

I do? That's news to me.

I simply cannot abide twerps like the one I was addressing who presume to speak as equals to intelligent and erudite people e.g. Frank Apisa and others. This person has a solid wall of air between his ears and is, apparently, not aware of it.

2 Replies

@Lustig Andrei,

Sorry, perhaps I tread to harshly, in your realm of comprehension, amidst the clarity you hold true here.

I withdraw the notion.

0 Replies

@Lustig Andrei,

What wisdom is there in rebuking a fool?

You shagging Frank, Lustig?
You're very protective of him
Smile

0 Replies

@mark noble,

Quote:

You are NOT contributing to this thread in any worthwhile fashion.

Well...I am responding...and while I acknowledge that I reacted to your "I need a change" tirade in a bit off subject...it was appropriate considering some of the stuff you are writing here.

Quote:

You sad, lonely twat.

No, no, Mark. I am almost never sad...never lonely...and I am not a twat.

I think I will stick around.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

But was it appropriate Frank?

Or have I simply accommodated the construct?
Are you maybe justifying the former with the latter, or am I facilitating your progressive vehicle?

And moreso to the point....why?

1 Reply

@mark noble,

Quote:

But was it appropriate Frank?

Allow me to be respectful in this answer, although it is not an answer you might want to hear:

Yes, it was appropriate, Mark...in light of your over-the-top response to Lustig...and later corroborated by your over-the-top comments to me.

Quote:

Or have I simply accommodated the construct?
Are you maybe justifying the former with the latter, or am I facilitating your progressive vehicle?

And moreso to the point....why?

In a sense, you have. You could have simply ignored any comments you thought inappropriate. Instead, you did accomodate them by getting surly. A certain amount of humor and ball-busting is tolerated in all threads. You could have lightened up a bit...and most of this would not have happened.

So to get back on track, perhaps you could answer me this:

What is the point to asking, "What is the point to SATAN?"

It sounds to me like a rhetorical question standing in for something much more specific. Can you give us an idea of what it is standing in stead?

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

The purpose of the question, as with any question, is to urge or initiate a response or series of responses.

And, if you feel there is a 'deeper' train of thought to be derived from the OP, feel free to express such.

The 'ad populum' consensus here is generally one of dismissal, in regards to my threads, and I have a tendency to reflect such condescention as I feel appropriate.

Lustig threw the first punch on the 'Holocaust' thread. Which he could have also opted to ignore and 'move on'.

He also stated my threads were pointless, boring and to be avoided - yet he still attends?
And, apparently, I have no right to indulge in intellectual debate with you Frank, for I am an abysmally inferior arsehole twerp.

Better to be humble among the poor, than share the spoils of the proud
Smile

1 Reply

@mark noble,

Quote:

Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5207463)
The purpose of the question, as with any question, is to urge or initiate a response or series of responses.

And, if you feel there is a 'deeper' train of thought to be derived from the OP, feel free to express such.

The 'ad populum' consensus here is generally one of dismissal, in regards to my threads, and I have a tendency to reflect such condescention as I feel appropriate.

Lustig threw the first punch on the 'Holocaust' thread. Which he could have also opted to ignore and 'move on'.

He also stated my threads were pointless, boring and to be avoided - yet he still attends?

Okay...mention that to him. Some people are gonna think certain threads are pointless and boring. Be happy they are willing to be honest with you when they tell you that about one of yours.

Quote:

And, apparently, I have no right to indulge in intellectual debate with you Frank, for I am an abysmally inferior arsehole twerp.

If you feel you are an abysmally inferior asshole twerp...so be it. You will never hear stuff like that from me about you.

To me...the question sounded rhetorical. I am the resident non-theist/n0n-atheist here in A2K...and in case you were headed in a direction of theism or atheism, I wanted to engage.

My bad.

Quote:

Better to be humble among the poor, than share the spoils of the proud

Okay...whatever that means.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

What it means is; I would rather immerse myself in my own excrement than subject myself to the standards and/or principles of the stupid.

You appear to defend your 'buddies' up to the point their hypocrisy precedes them.......leading to typical 'abandonment'.

I understand your behaviour and actually enjoy playing these pointless games. Or do I?

Your call:)

Do resurge with something of interest please. Up till now, your analysis of me is WORTHLESS, for I am the SOLE contributor to the collective info available hereat.....

Or is it YOU who is on display?
Note the 'CAPS' please - Others will
Smile

1 Reply

If anyone, other than the provocative few, wishes to tend a reasonable explanation for the obvious Biblical contradiction, made apparent by the OP and limited directives thereat, I would be grateful.

But if, like some, you feel the need to passively illuminate your own inadequacies....... Fuckoff.

Cheers!
Mark

0 Replies

@mark noble,

Quote:

Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5207663)
What it means is; I would rather immerse myself in my own excrement than subject myself to the standards and/or principles of the stupid.

Oh...why didn't you just say that?

Am I wrong...or do you think you are much more intelligent than the others here?

Quote:

You appear to defend your 'buddies' up to the point their hypocrisy precedes them.......leading to typical 'abandonment'.

Does that sentence actually make sense to you?

Quote:

I understand your behaviour and actually enjoy playing these pointless games. Or do I?

Isn't that a question you have to answer yourself. Or are you asking me to guess?

Quote:

Your call:)

Okay...so you apparently are asking me to guess...so I will flip a coin. Heads "you do"...tails "you don't"...and it is a "heads"...so I guess you do.

Quote:

Do resurge with something of interest please. Up till now, your analysis of me is WORTHLESS, for I am the SOLE contributor to the collective info available hereat.....

You are a gem.

Is that interesting enough?

Quote:

Or is it YOU who is on display?
Note the 'CAPS' please - Others will

Ya never know who will and who won't.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Actually Frank - I believe myself equal to all sentient beings...

More intelligent in some areas, less in others.
But of quantifiable structure.

I do like your methodical redirections to your assumed audience though, whereas I have no pride/shame, thus do not give a toss how I am percieved.

You REALLY need this, don't you?
Happy to oblige Smile

1 Reply

@mark noble,

Quote:

Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5207784)
Actually Frank - I believe myself equal to all sentient beings...

Oh! I am sure many people listening to your rants were not aware of this. Thanks for clearing that up.

Quote:

More intelligent in some areas, less in others.
But of quantifiable structure.

"Quantifiable structure"???

Is that something you just made up...or did someone make it up for you?

Why not share what you were attempting to say with that comment.

Quote:

I do like your methodical redirections to your assumed audience though, whereas I have no pride/shame...

I read most of what you write. I pretty much assumed you have no pride or shame, but it was nice of you to put it out here so clearly. Thanks.

Quote:

...thus do not give a toss how I am percieved.

Obviously.

Quote:

You REALLY need this, don't you?
Happy to oblige

Thanks, Mark. Hope you are enjoying it as much as I. Wink

0 Replies

Of course Frank...

When next I exist as you, I will indulge accordingly...

Want more fodder to play with, or may I return to my cresh?

2 Replies

@mark noble,

You have a cresh too?

Do they turn out the lights, or your eyes more sore, than mine?

0 Replies

@mark noble,

Quote:

Of course Frank...

Good. I wouldn't want to be having as much fun as I am without you enjoying it also.

Quote:

When next I exist as you, I will indulge accordingly...

Aha...you KNOW you will exist as me...and you know what you will do.

How do you KNOW that?

Quote:

Want more fodder to play with, or may I return to my cresh?

Stick around for as long as you want, Mark. That is a decision you must make. I'll be right here.

0 Replies

I will, but will likely, unless you do, fragmented or otherwise, have no recollection of existing as me. Unless, of course, it is in a furthered universal paradigm where unified consciousness is more unified.....?

But, that is not an outlet I can digest or describe, as of yet.

This intended to COMPLETELY disrupt this thread, or just illuminate 'nice old, clever Frank'?

I await your imminent breakdown and subsequent analysis of this post, with heaps of bated-expectation.

So...... The 'SATAN' queery... Anyone?

1 Reply

What is the point to 'SATAN'

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know