Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5197991)
Frank, did you recently suffer a concussion?
Your comments on this subject make no sense, you seem to be quite emotional and irrational.
You want to invite evil whack-jobs to schools and other 'gun free zones' allowing
them to do what they're going to do without meeting much if any resistance.
Foofie, at least you are trying to offer a layer of protection, but an active shooter shooting blindly at sheeple that are also blind is probably not a a good thing.
Training and arming several responsible adults for each and every school will deter evil and if need be, these armed adults can put evil down right there, right now.
I forgot to add, the device I envision would also have an alarm, perhaps silent, and first responders would be able to "see" the perpetrator with protective eyewear.
Absolutely stupid analogy.
Water never intentionally tries to drown anyone.
On the other hand, people have worked incessantly to make driving safer, the cars more protective and better regulated, and the drivers better regulated as welland more competent, for the last century. None of those things have happened with guns.
The gun extremists kick and scream at any such attempt.
This is possibly the dumbest 'strawman' I've ever heard. It is so dumb that I would recommend that anyone proposing such a 'strawman' should have themselves immediately tested for heavy metal poisoning because their mental capacity is severely lacking.
That would include you Ganja.
Wrongo Oralloy----The car and water, like most tools, although dangerous if misused have beneficial applications if used correctly.
A firearm, handguns and large capacity wanna-be assault rifles, are not used used as tools.
They have only one use--to be dangerous.
It is a stupid strawman.
One that is so obvious, you'd have to be a dumb as a box of GunjaSnaKKKes not to see it immediately.
As for home protection strawman --I have a far more effective method, an early puppy alarm and response.
Home protection is not a strawman. It is a legitimate activity that is guaranteed by that Constitution that you hate so much.
Name me one object that was constructed with a firearm and I'll cede my argument that a forearm is NOT a tool
BTW your strawman that I hate the constitution is equally fallacious.
Now that's funny oralloy. On another thread you were claiming that the Constitution never granted rights to own slaves even though those were specifically taken away and now you claim there is somehow a right of home protection in the Constitution? Can you tell us where that is? Right next to the right to privacy perhaps?
So then you agree that the ninth also grants the right to own slaves (which was later taken away by an amendment) and for white men to vote.
Why is that?
Are you saying women have a constitutional right to vote but white men don't?