Debacle
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Dec, 2002 10:41 pm
Wisht somebody would line me up with this classy Aussie wench I've had me eye on for quite a spell now.

http://www.dame-edna.com/biography.htm

If you don't think I have much hope there, the red-headed sheila at the bottom of the page would probably do the trick.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Dec, 2002 10:56 pm
Dame Edna could give you a bit of a shock. The lady at the bottom of the page is Madge, "her" bridesmaid.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Dec, 2002 10:57 pm
Ooooooh, Debacle, Dame Edna is one fantastic broad! As for the little redhead, well, you certainly go for hot mamas!! Have you been hitting the Viagra? Were you planning to take them both out? We need some details here!

I'm off to bed, but I want to be able to read all about it tomorrow.
Just remember, be careful. We all want a healthy, strong Debacle, not a broken, exhausted Debacle. Those look like mighty wild women to me.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 12:31 am
Jaysus! Dame Edna would snap our dear Debacle in two, like a stick, just with her acid tongue! I saw her destroy Richard Gere (not that I consider our darling Debcl a mere bagatelle like RG) in the shake of a gnat's whisker - just by mentioning his "front botty" and how she longed to powder it......but I digress...as this thread needs to, it is become a flirt thread!

However - I confess that, when stirred, my bosom DOES heave, rather, so 'tis a true phenomenon.....albeit rather rare.....
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 12:48 am
funny though, before I re-read the thread, I thought that Dame Edna was Debacle in drag. Razz Very Happy Razz Very Happy
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 12:56 am
Dear me, no! Poor deb - what a thing to say!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 12:58 am
Does our Debbicle DO drag? gasp!
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 01:00 am
Never know about them mid-westerners. :wink:
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 01:05 am
Hmmmmmmmm - 'tis damn near impossible to keep Aussie men out of frocks - come a chance to strut their stuff.......hmmmmm.....mutters: gym slips.....pigtails......juicy fruit.....
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 01:11 am
Question Shocked Question Shocked
0 Replies
 
JoanneDorel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 01:13 am
Must be real men then. Not being afraid of cross dressing.
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 01:21 am
Don't know about that JD, what would you think if you walked in on one of your close male family members cross dressing. Can you imagine catching your father or a brother in a bra and panties?????? Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

I duuno, maybe I'm old fashioned but I would not thing my dad or brothers were "real"men if I saw that........................... Very Happy Very Happy

Frankly I wouldn't now what to think, except it must be time for another beer. Drunk
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 04:14 am
I do mean for parties and performances you know!

Don't men generally wear pants?

Are male and female underwear so dissimilar as to cause bruised feelings?

Would a man cross-dressing for frolicsome purposes need to change underwear? I confess I have never noticed this small detail when dressing for performances.

I CAN tell you, though, that men, generally, don't have proper edges to their lips - a major drawback when applying lippy to them.

'Tis weird - why should evolution have favoured proper lip edges in women, and not in men? - and don't start trumpeting about lipstick and the movement of sexually attractive whatsits from the back to the front - there hasn't been lipstick around long enough for its easy placement to have had an evolutionary impact....
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 04:29 am
Hmm, I think you need to ask Debacle about lipstick usage on men Shocked
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 04:31 am
dlowan wrote:

Are male and female underwear so dissimilar as to cause bruised feelings?

Would a man cross-dressing for frolicsome purposes need to change underwear? I confess I have never noticed this small detail when dressing for performances.



I think D, can answer this part as well Very Happy
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 04:32 am
I think Pueo is avoiding the question!
0 Replies
 
pueo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 04:35 am
Men generally wear trousers, women and possibly D, wear pants. Razz
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 04:58 am
Life is strange.....but hey! How come, then, people ask who wears the pants in a relationship - generally people who think men ought to!
0 Replies
 
Debacle
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 08:03 am
I'll have you know, I wear the galligaskins in our family ... except at this particularly fridgid moment when I'm adorned in red union suit, ugs (my idea of Aussie drag) and mackinaw ... but that'll all change once Mrs. D gets up, stokes the biler and brews the bean - I'm on vacation, doncha know.

Initially I'm one with Dame Edna, but that's as far as she goes. Actually, I'd prefer a role of the bride's maid -- I Madge in that.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Dec, 2002 08:27 am
You soooooooo do not want to be Madge! In imagination, or elsewhere....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/25/2025 at 10:51:19