1
   

Waco Parents Stand Up For Bigotry!

 
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 04:07 pm
Patiodog, to be an adult Amish you have to be a member of the Amish church. For most that occurs in their early 20's at the time of their marriage. In any case it is solely the responsiblity and prerogative of the church community to let you in or boot you out. So it would appear an individual can return at any time, if they will let you.
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 04:36 pm
hobitbob wrote:
No, I'm saying that they have no right to condemn their daughters to the same ignorance they embrace.


They do until they're 18 or get emancipated. And I think that's the way it should be. They would feel the same way about you raising them liberal. It is simply your right as a parent to control your child's life until they are of legal age. The government has no business in interfering with that unless the parents are physically harming/mentally abusing the child.
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 04:40 pm
Brian wrote:
I have a feeling this goes far beyond planned parenthood. The fact is, The Girl Scouts have become a left wing liberal organization over the years and some people are fed up with it.


What I don't like about the girl scouts:

Girl scouts was founded by a women's rights activist who believed in teaching girls basic wilderness survival skills that were considered improper for them to know at the time. I think that idea is great, I also like the mother-daughter participation and the friendships.

What I don't like is that in many cases the organization has turned into a "girly" social club where all they do is sell cookies and make doilies (I had the unfortunate experience in being in one of these.) They stress singing and other "girl" activities. They should be taking girls out on hikes, showing them how to start fires, how to fish, pitch a tent, recognize poisonous snakes, show them how to build things, etc. If I ever become a girl scout leader that is exactly what I will try to do with my troop.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 04:43 pm
POrtal, I rarely disagree with you, but I do here. Many girls (and boys) are sexually active long before they turn 18. The best way to prevent teen pregnancies and STDs is to educate people about safer and unsafe sexual practices. One cannot count on such things being taught at home, especially in homes like the one's belonging to the outraged biddys-in-training in Texas. Would you rather "family values" were conserved, with the associated pregnancies and STDs, or that he fallacy of "conservative morals" be sacrificed for the higher good of the girls? I would rather see the latter.
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 04:46 pm
hobitbob wrote:
POrtal, I rarely disagree with you, but I do here. Many girls (and boys) are sexually active long before they turn 18. The best way to prevent teen pregnancies and STDs is to educate people about safer and unsafe sexual practices. One cannot count on such things being taught at home, especially in homes like the one's belonging to the outraged biddys-in-training in Texas. Would you rather "family values" were conserved, with the associated pregnancies and STDs, or that he fallacy of "conservative morals" be sacrificed for the higher good of the girls? I would rather see the latter.


I agree with you and I love planned parenthood. But it is still the right of the parents to determine these things. Less government intervention in private life is always better - because you never know when they might chose to discriminate against you.

Agencies like planned parenthood exist for these sorts of people. The kid can run away and get an abortion. The kid goes to school and is exposed to different ideas - through teachers and friends. The kid may just decide not to have sex. The government has no right in interfering with the views of the kids parents, to do so would be totalitarian.
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 05:07 pm
hobitbob wrote:
POrtal, I rarely disagree with you, but I do here. Many girls (and boys) are sexually active long before they turn 18. The best way to prevent teen pregnancies and STDs is to educate people about safer and unsafe sexual practices. One cannot count on such things being taught at home, especially in homes like the one's belonging to the outraged biddys-in-training in Texas. Would you rather "family values" were conserved, with the associated pregnancies and STDs, or that he fallacy of "conservative morals" be sacrificed for the higher good of the girls? I would rather see the latter.




The problem is that you are equating teaching and encouraging abstinence in your children with not teaching them anything but. (One of those long standing Liberal myths that I hate so much)

Most Conservatives believe in teaching their children ALL the facts about abortion, pre marital sex, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Yet at the same time, we teach our children that that we consider abortion to be immoral.
That we consider pre marital sex to be wrong and abstinence is a better alternative.
We teach them that avoiding these pitfalls can help keep one safe from STD's.

The problem is that you seem to think that your way of raising children is the only 'right' way and the only one with validity and that we are somehow ignorant or bigoted when we raise our children with the values we cherish.

We, on the other hand, believe that you are misguided in encouraging your children run sexually rampant and yet we don't interfere with your raising of your children.

But please don't think that we want to allow our children to hang out with and learn by example, the promiscuity and lack of values that you wish to imprint on your children.
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 05:45 pm
I don't think there's anything wrong with being ignorant up to a certain age. Young girls (and boys too of course) are ignorant of almost everything in this world.

P.S. - not to sound like a fool, but what is "Planned Parenthood?" Is it just a sex education organization?
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 05:51 pm
Planned parenthood started as a government social program designed to teach people about sexual health care and also be a very low cost/no cost clinic. When the abortion controversy started getting high the government cut funding to planned parenthood (who supports abortion rights - is pro-choice, being a sex clinic).

So now they are an independent organization, but still provide the same basic services they used to. They have a good website full of accurate sexual health information planned parenthood
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 05:55 pm
Fedral wrote:
hobitbob wrote:
POrtal, I rarely disagree with you, but I do here. Many girls (and boys) are sexually active long before they turn 18. The best way to prevent teen pregnancies and STDs is to educate people about safer and unsafe sexual practices. One cannot count on such things being taught at home, especially in homes like the one's belonging to the outraged biddys-in-training in Texas. Would you rather "family values" were conserved, with the associated pregnancies and STDs, or that he fallacy of "conservative morals" be sacrificed for the higher good of the girls? I would rather see the latter.




The problem is that you are equating teaching and encouraging abstinence in your children with not teaching them anything but. (One of those long standing Liberal myths that I hate so much)

Most Conservatives believe in teaching their children ALL the facts about abortion, pre marital sex, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Yet at the same time, we teach our children that that we consider abortion to be immoral.
That we consider pre marital sex to be wrong and abstinence is a better alternative.
We teach them that avoiding these pitfalls can help keep one safe from STD's.

The problem is that you seem to think that your way of raising children is the only 'right' way and the only one with validity and that we are somehow ignorant or bigoted when we raise our children with the values we cherish.

We, on the other hand, believe that you are misguided in encouraging your children run sexually rampant and yet we don't interfere with your raising of your children.

But please don't think that we want to allow our children to hang out with and learn by example, the promiscuity and lack of values that you wish to imprint on your children.


Fedral - I agree with you that we should not have the option to interfere with each others homes! I agree with you on that point tenfold, it is a matter of individual liberty. Unfortunately, certain religious sects (ex: the strict parts of the Catholic and Mormon church) completely shun sexuality before marriage - even masturbation, to the extent of having to confess and then punishing sexual thoughts. I find this offensive and damaging, but I cannot and would not interfere, I only hope the people will come to terms with their own problems once they are independent.)

What I don't like is that you think sex before marriage automatically implies a lack of values. I am not religious and have sex before marriage, but I have very high and strict moral values. I think it is more of a question of what your values are. Clearly, they are different for many indiviudals. But having values (even opposing ones) is different, and I think more respectable, than not having any values or ideas.

I think there is nothing wrong with not being a virgin, as long as you have sex safely (getting tested, using birth control) and respectfully (someone you love and care about, who loves and cares about you.)
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 05:57 pm
SCoates wrote:
I don't think there's anything wrong with being ignorant up to a certain age. Young girls (and boys too of course) are ignorant of almost everything in this world.

P.S. - not to sound like a fool, but what is "Planned Parenthood?" Is it just a sex education organization?

Oh, the irony in the above post. Confused
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 05:58 pm
Portal Star wrote:
Fedral wrote:
hobitbob wrote:
POrtal, I rarely disagree with you, but I do here. Many girls (and boys) are sexually active long before they turn 18. The best way to prevent teen pregnancies and STDs is to educate people about safer and unsafe sexual practices. One cannot count on such things being taught at home, especially in homes like the one's belonging to the outraged biddys-in-training in Texas. Would you rather "family values" were conserved, with the associated pregnancies and STDs, or that he fallacy of "conservative morals" be sacrificed for the higher good of the girls? I would rather see the latter.




The problem is that you are equating teaching and encouraging abstinence in your children with not teaching them anything but. (One of those long standing Liberal myths that I hate so much)

Most Conservatives believe in teaching their children ALL the facts about abortion, pre marital sex, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Yet at the same time, we teach our children that that we consider abortion to be immoral.
That we consider pre marital sex to be wrong and abstinence is a better alternative.
We teach them that avoiding these pitfalls can help keep one safe from STD's.

The problem is that you seem to think that your way of raising children is the only 'right' way and the only one with validity and that we are somehow ignorant or bigoted when we raise our children with the values we cherish.

We, on the other hand, believe that you are misguided in encouraging your children run sexually rampant and yet we don't interfere with your raising of your children.

But please don't think that we want to allow our children to hang out with and learn by example, the promiscuity and lack of values that you wish to imprint on your children.


Fedral - I agree with you that we should not have the option to interfere with each others homes! I agree with you on that point tenfold, it is a matter of individual liberty.

What I don't like is that you think sex before marriage automatically implies a lack of values. I am not religious and have sex before marriage, but I have very high and strict moral values. I think it is more of a question of what your values are. Clearly, they are different for many indiviudals. But having values (even opposing ones) is different, and I think more respectable, than not having any values or ideas.

I think there is nothing wrong with not being a virgin, as long as you have sex safely (getting tested, using birth control) and respectfully (someone you love and care about, who loves and cares about you.)

Portal, shall we schedule your stoning for later this week?
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:00 pm
Smile I knew I was exposing my ignorance.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:02 pm
SCoates wrote:
Smile I knew I was exposing my ignorance.

Just don't expose it in public, or to small children! Wink
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:06 pm
I think people have a right to protest anything they feel the need to and that includes the religious right. Maybe the other side should start talking back to compensate.

I am against abortion but it is the law of the land and the girl scouts have a right to promote it if they feel it is right. I am for teaching about safe sex and abstinence to teenagers as young as twelve in both schools and where ever else young teenagers meet like the girls and boys scouts.
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:07 pm
I think you're being sensationalist, Hobit Bob.

I won't get stoned - because it is illegal. In both the plant and punishment sense.

Do you really want the government to determine what you can and cannot teach your children? What if you disagree with how the government feels about that? What if the majority of people in your governing bloc felt opposite the way you did?

I think it is best to keep the government out of private matters. I sincerely believe that is one of the "unspoken rights" of the constitution.
0 Replies
 
K e v i n
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:09 pm
I believe pierre-ellieot truedou once said "the government has no place in the bedrooms of the nation". Is it relevant? Barely. Do I know if that is exactly what he said? not sure. Do I know what I'm talking about? No. Am I participating? YES! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Jer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:12 pm
Fedral,

You said:
Quote:
Most Conservatives believe in teaching their children ALL the facts about abortion, pre marital sex, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Yet at the same time, we teach our children that that we consider abortion to be immoral.


Do you really think that MOST believe in teaching ALL the facts? And if they believe in it, do you think that most get around to actually teaching them [the facts]?

To see Planned Parenthood's mission statement.

It doesn't look to me that planned parenthood encourages abortion, so much as discouraging the limiting of an individual's right over their own body.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:41 pm
revel wrote:
I am against abortion but it is the law of the land and the girl scouts have a right to promote it if they feel it is right.


My ex-wife was a Girl Scout leader and never in all the time that she was involved did she promote, or even discuss abortion with the girls of her troop. Planed Parenthood is not a pro abortion lobby group. It is a long established organization that promotes womens reproductive health and other womens health issues. I seriously doubt that the award given by the Girl Scouts to the head of Planed Parenthood had anything to do with abortion. This is a made up controversy driven by a group of ignorant Texas ninnes whose lack of knowledge and understanding about the world outside their own narrow community makes them susceptible to any off the wall rumor that runes counter to their own insular world view.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 06:51 pm
acquiunk
I agree wholeheartedly.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Mar, 2004 07:45 pm
Me too.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/29/2025 at 04:45:17