Reply
Wed 3 Mar, 2004 03:14 pm
The hot topic of the month is the gay marriage. Which I'm all for, I see no reason against it.
However, my porno/playboyish fantasies involving hot lesbians has come to a screeching halt, thanks to this new revolution. The internet and newspapers are jammed showing gay couples involved in the marriage thing. Every picture I see on the internet of gay women waiting in line to get married, or every time I turn on the Rosie O'Donnel show(she never gets hot), or even seeing women driving cars with rainbow stickers on the back...they all suck. Look like little boys, or NFL linemen. I even went to a party a while back hosted by lesbians, and the only attractive female in the house was straight. What's the deal here? Gay men are widely known as fashionable, well groomed, ect, while lesbians look like lumberjacks.
What happened to the gorgeous sensual lipstick lesbos they show in the movies? Do they not exist? Please, tell me they do. Please, I beg of you. The last thing I need is to go back to the days of masturbating to crayon drawn pictures of the Jackson Five(don't ask).
So....do they exist? And do you know any? I think I may have asked this before, but I'm still not convinced they're around.
I've known some lesbians I thought were pretty hot. Then again, I'm just a lesbian trapped in a man's body...
Well, I haven't met any of them since university, but you can always rent The Hunger over and over, and just try to put David Bowie out of your mind.
They overwhelmingly exist in the movies and your imagination, but they exist.
I mean, assume that 10% of the population is gay. That means 10% of really hot chicks are gay. But how many realy hot chicks are there? 90% of them, in that figure, are straight.
I have known a few actual hot lesbians, hope that makes you happy. However, all of them would have laughed incredulously (if not doing something more violent, which I started to type but worried that would just get you all hot) at the idea that their sex life would have anything to do with you or any other man in any shape or form. Yuck!
I've never seen any "hot" ones. Personally I think the distribution is not proportionate at all.
So I'd doubt that 10% of the "really hot chicks" are gay. I bet it's closer to 0.01%.
Note: I think looks will sometimes play a part in the enviromental factors leading to that lifestyle. This is wildly unpopular as far as opinions go (especially among feminists) but I'm sticking with it.
course, it probably doesn't help that much of the self-mauling that goes toward the conventional notion of hotness is repellent to most politically-minded lesbians (which is to say, a lot of 'em).
How many lesbians does it to change a light bulb?
That's not funny, oppressor.
Alternative punchline: Three. One to climb up that ladder and change it, one to look up her dress, and one to write a folk song about it.
Sorry, lesbians...
Q: How many you Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: You don't know, man, because you weren't there!
Sorry, vets...
Yeah, to both patiodog's and Craven's points.
It makes total sense to me that gay men are hotter than the norm, lesbians are less hot than the norm. I mean everyone always talks about how men are so visual, while women want feelings yadda yadda. So men wanting to attract other men up the visual stimuli. Women wanting to attract other women exult in the fact that since the other women don't particularly care, they don't have to endure the waxing and the dieting and the stillettos (those things HURT) and the hour-plus "putting on my face" sessions and all of the aspects that go into creating the visual stimulus that translates to "hot" for men.
I suppose that's why the Queer as Folk, both British and American versions did better here than the CBC production, Both my Moms are Engineers.
There was an additional factor in my comment. I'm also saying that looks play a part in sexuality. I'm saying that hot women opt for exclusive lesbianism at a lesser rate.
I'm not disagreeing with that. I also know women who were (I gotta memorize the damn kinsey scale someday -- I think 0 is straight, I remember thinking it was a little editorial comment) say 1-3 but who had been ignored and/ or victimized by men their whole lives and then were given attention by women and liked it and went along with it.
The movie "Monster" is supposed to be about that, in part.
Dammit you are supposed to disagree with it! Sheesh, what is wrong with feminism today? Where's the rage. The quivering lip and the sense of "struggle" against both injustice and sensibility?
By George it was a comment about attractiveness and sexuality, asserting a correlation between the two! You're supposed to be all over it like hairs on a lesbian's upper lip!
Don yew that icon in vain?
Sigh, I guess I'll have to find a new Amish.
Yawn...sorry, did you say something?
Ahh, finally a raging feminist. Whew, life is back to nermal.
I'd argue with ya Craven but I guess I'm all argued out today. *snicker* Besides, I kinda agree with ya! (I think!)
You're not a feminist. It's only fun with feminists.
"I think every woman should try feminism at least once. You know... when they are at a party and there are no guys to dance with..."
C'mon Deb! Put 'em up. I just equated *gasp* feminism and lesbianism in jest. Your nostrils should be positively flaring right now.
Craven de Kere wrote:
"I think every woman should try feminism at least once. You know... when they are at a party and there are no guys to dance with..."
Isn't that when they start talking about how rugged Subarus are?
Wot?? I'm not a feminist???
Well that explains a few things. Hmmm...
Ya gotta watch that one there Craven. You can tell when she's ready to strike. The left ear twitches twice and then she pounces.
Ahh, since you are well versed in Bunny signs what does it mean when she drags her butt across the grass with her eyes half closed and a huge grin plastered on her face?
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace