1
   

Does "than" mean "in comparison with" here?

 
 
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 02:17 am
Here, "more...than...more", the word than is used in an equal comparison, while nomally the comparison would be unequal.

Context:

1)The non-partisan National Journal rates a Senator's votes by what
percentage of the Senate voted more liberally than he or she, and what
percentage more conservatively, in three policy areas: economic,
social, and foreign. For 2005–2006 (as reported in the 2008 Almanac
of American Politics), McCain's average ratings were as follows:
economic policy: 59 percent conservative and 41 percent liberal; social
policy: 54 percent conservative / 38 percent liberal;, and foreign policy:
56 percent conservative / 43 percent liberal.[287]
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 1,104 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 04:14 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
Here, "more...than...more", the word than is used in an equal comparison


It is not. There is no equal comparison, but there are two unequal ones. I slightly rearrange the quoted section, and add implied words in square brackets, and I assume a male Senator for the sake of brevity:

The non-partisan National Journal rates a Senator's votes by:

What percentage of the Senate voted more liberally than he [did]

and

what percentage [of the Senate voted] more conservatively [than he did],

in three policy areas: (etc)
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 04:53 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

oristarA wrote:
Here, "more...than...more", the word than is used in an equal comparison


It is not. There is no equal comparison, but there are two unequal ones. I slightly rearrange the quoted section, and add implied words in square brackets, and I assume a male Senator for the sake of brevity:

The non-partisan National Journal rates a Senator's votes by:

What percentage of the Senate voted more liberally than he [did]

and

what percentage [of the Senate voted] more conservatively [than he did],

in three policy areas: (etc)


Excellent!

The non-partisan National Journal rates a Senator's votes by:

What percentage of the Senate voted more liberally than he [nomally did]

and

what percentage [of the Senate voted] more conservatively [than he nomally did],
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 05:21 am
I don't know why you wrote "nomally"... did you mean normally? That word would be inappropriate since the percentage is calculated for each vote separately.

oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 08:45 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

I don't know why you wrote "nomally"... did you mean normally? That word would be inappropriate since the percentage is calculated for each vote separately.



Sorry for the typo. Yes, normally.

Well, as I reread your reply and found my understanding has not been improved much though your reply really helped to decipher the grammar.

Let's reread the context:
Quote:
The non-partisan National Journal rates a Senator's votes by what
percentage of the Senate voted more liberally than he or she, and what
percentage more conservatively, in three policy areas: economic,
social, and foreign.


1: The task is to rate a Senator's votes
2: The method is "by"
3: The concrete content of the "by":
"by what percentage of the Senate voted more liberally than he or she, and what percentage more conservatively"

4: Supposed there are only 100 members (senators) in the Senate, now vote more liberally. Well, how to calculate the percentage?

oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 09:59 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
4: Supposed there are only 100 members (senators) in the Senate, now vote more liberally. Well, how to calculate the percentage?


Actually, 100 is exactly how many there really are.

50 states, and 2 senators from each state.



I'm not sure if this answers your question, but:

For the person with the most conservative voting record, they would say 0% of the other senators voted more conservatively than that person, and 100% of the other senators voted more liberally than that person.

For the person with the most liberal voting record, they would say 0% of the other senators voted more liberally than that person, and 100% of the other Senators voted more conservatively than that person.

If a senator had 50% of the other senators voting more liberally, and 50% of the other senators voting more conservatively, that senator might be considered a moderate.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 11:33 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

oristarA wrote:
4: Supposed there are only 100 members (senators) in the Senate, now vote more liberally. Well, how to calculate the percentage?


Actually, 100 is exactly how many there really are.

50 states, and 2 senators from each state.



I'm not sure if this answers your question, but:

For the person with the most conservative voting record, they would say 0% of the other senators voted more conservatively than that person, and 100% of the other senators voted more liberally than that person.

For the person with the most liberal voting record, they would say 0% of the other senators voted more liberally than that person, and 100% of the other Senators voted more conservatively than that person.

If a senator had 50% of the other senators voting more liberally, and 50% of the other senators voting more conservatively, that senator might be considered a moderate.


Excellent!


In "McCain's average ratings were as follows:
economic policy: 59 percent conservative and 41 percent liberal; social
policy: 54 percent conservative / 38 percent liberal;, and foreign policy:
56 percent conservative / 43 percent liberal.[287] ,"
does '59 percent conservative and 41 percent liberal" refer to 59% of the other Senators voted more conservatively than McCain and 41% of the other Senators voted more liberally than him?

oralloy
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2012 12:22 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
does '59 percent conservative and 41 percent liberal" refer to 59% of the other Senators voted more conservatively than McCain and 41% of the other Senators voted more liberally than him?


I think it is the reverse. A higher conservative number would mean he was more conservative, which would mean that more of the other senators voted more liberally than he did.

So "59% conservative" would mean that 59% of the other senators voted more liberally than he did.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does "than" mean "in comparison with" here?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/28/2025 at 09:11:08