@McGentrix,
McGentrix,
I get it. I am not arguing the point. I am saying that as a matter of political strategy the slogan is terrible. It doesn't get the point across on its own. Rather than putting forward a new vision, it is a response to their opponent. Worst of all, it needs all those words to explain it.
A good slogan is short, clear and easy to understand with no explanation by people who aren't following the campaign.
Taking an opponent's words out of context to build a strawman is common in politics. Both sides do it. You can see examples of this all the time in sites like Redstate and DailyKos.
But it is a form of political masturbation. It makes you feel good and tingly for a while, but it does very little to build the relationship you want with the American voters. And, it certainly isn't something you want to do on prime time TV with a national audience.
Speaking purely from the view of political strategy, I feel the Republicans have squandered a great chance to define themselves as a party. Instead they are spending their time responding to a single speech from their opponent in a way that requires hundreds of words to explain it.
I think the GOP is going blind.