onyxelle wrote:Frank, I know already how you feel about the bible being fairytales and about people believe in it or whatever...but for people that are christians, the importance is Jesus' death/ressurection as well as the gospel he preached.
Onyxelle
If you re-read my comment, you will not see me mocking that belief.
Jesus died...and if you want to "believe" he was resurrected, so be it.
He may very well have died for what he preached -- although with the Romans as occupiers, the jury is still out on that.
But dwelling on the suffering, beatings, and torture is second-rate stuff - and, in my opinion, does dishonor to the man's memory.
In any case, we don't really know how much he was beaten.
Gibson is making most of this up.
But the Romans were a rather cruel lot (hell, instead of going to a movie, many went to watch people die horrible deaths in arenas) and a particularly sadistic crew may have taken Jesus to his crucifixion. It is also possible the soldiers were simply carrying out an execution; had no taste for cruelty; and didn't do one-tenth what is depicted.
WE DO NOT KNOW.
To dwell on the passion -- to deal with it in this crass commercial way -- sucks.
Jesus had a message -- a part of which can appeal even to agnostics and atheists as is does to you folks who think he was god.
That is the significant element of his life.
This other stuff is bullshit.