18
   

They’re 18 for Gods sake

 
 
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 06:44 am
@spendius,
Quote:
I don't call him on it JT like I don't bang my head against thick, brick walls such as those surrounding the Tower Of London.


Oh, but you do, Spendi, and often. Your forehead must have mortar lines in it.

Again, you make your choices and I'll make mine.
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 06:54 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
The US constitution is suppose to keep religion dogma and the state at arm length and as I am an atheist and so is my sexual partner their silliness have no claim on me of any kind.


You are confused on that Bill. Unlike JTT I will explain why.

On these matters the dogma of the Church and the rules of a State might well be identical and with the same legitimation. Because the Church gets a bit fanciful in certain respects does not mean it is not pragmatic regarding sexual morality which is often more rigid in atheist governments.

What I mean is that because you don't believe that Jesus ascended into heaven is not a justification for a sexual free-for-all. The Church's "silliness" may not extend to all its teachings. It might well not extend to any of them if they were scrutinised with attention.

We do know that the Church has lasted longer than any state.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:06 am
@spendius,
Quote:
We do know that the Church has lasted longer than any state.


Of course it has. It has relied on fear and the easy pickins it finds in folks who can be duped by those fears. It's a place for those who can't rise to real power to get some of their own and still be free to boink little boys and enjoy the other perks of politicians.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:09 am
@JTT,
Quote:
I don't need to take a position on every little issue, Spendi. My reference was to Rocky in a longer, ongoing sense.


This is not a little issue. And you need to take a position on it before admonishing Rocky for not doing. And with you coming on for a "handbags at two paces" session with certain of your pet feuds is not called for either. Those really are "little issues" when measured up against the issues here.

We are not discussing Rocky in any sense never mind a longer, ongoing one. He does that himself somewhere.

Quote:
Why are you so paranoid all of a sudden, S? Read Engineer's two terse responses.


There you go again. Another vacuous assertion. Like Frank said so well--inventing bullshit in order to be indignant about it. I'm not in the least paranoid. Ever or suddenly. If I was one of your "thoroughly confused" I wanted to know why then I can correct it.

And I read Engineer's post and replied to it.

Quote:
It's surely a grand joke that YOU are trying to tell me what to write.


Another flop of invented bullshit.

Quote:
Once you get involved in war crimes, it colors your whole being.


Maybe. I can see why it would. But suppose all the war crimes are founded in the control of female sexuality.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:11 am
@spendius,
That's not an explanation, that's just a long winded excuse, Spendi. Something along the lines of your dismal attempts at explaining language issues.

Try again.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:15 am
@JTT,
Quote:
Oh, but you do, Spendi, and often. Your forehead must have mortar lines in it.

Again, you make your choices and I'll make mine.


All I'm saying is that your jibe at Rocky applies to yourself up to now. That's a fact.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:17 am
@spendius,
When the state of Texas order that any child in it that talk back to his or her parents be kill or anyone who work on Sunday be kill and so on then you might had a point.

Lot of nonsense in the Christian bible that is not so far follow by the state so why picked some elements or fears to enacted into law and no others?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:20 am
@spendius,
Quote:
All I'm saying is that your jibe at Rocky applies to yourself up to now.


My "jibe" to Rocky pointed to much more than this thread. I described a general condition.

But considering how paranoid everyone seems to be on this thread, it's understandable that you missed it.

Quote:
That's a fact.


Do you always waste this much time on the obvious? No response necessary.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:28 am
@JTT,
Quote:
Of course it has. It has relied on fear and the easy pickins it finds in folks who can be duped by those fears. It's a place for those who can't rise to real power to get some of their own and still be free to boink little boys and enjoy the other perks of politicians.


You really are picking the dross out of the cracks at the bottom of the barrel with that JTT.

It's the usual stuff. They are all dupes. By implication you are not. And yet, in your eagerness, you have been duped into thinking that some evil priests are capable of undermining Catholic theology.

I saw a film on PBS called Clinton. The perks of politicians didn't look very nice to me from that programme. He was not always on camera. How he managed to smile when he was on camera is a mystery to me. It looked like 8 years of agony and his hair went white and his heart needed a by-pass. You're confusing what you see on TV with the reality. When I think of how an ex-govenor of a state might live I cannot help thinking he was mad to climb on that cross.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:38 am
@JTT,
Quote:
That's not an explanation, that's just a long winded excuse, Spendi. Something along the lines of your dismal attempts at explaining language issues.

Try again.


You're not up to snuff JT for a thread like this. Your remarks are meaningless.

Why was it not an explanation? Why was it a long-winded excuse? Why were my contributions to language discussions dismal.

You're an assertion machine. You're a cross-eyed, bow-legged, stunted, runny-nosed squirt. I can assert if I wish. If only to make the point that unsupported assertions are drivel.
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 04:23 pm
@spendius,
This is hilarious. Don't miss it folks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkjKI_H21gA

I'm not typing ROTFLMAO to make a phoney statement. I'm rollin' on the floor laughing my arse off and there's tears a runnin' down ma cheeks.

They clapped. They cheered. They thought it was an expression of feminine freedom.

And they stick Brittini in the clink for 5 ******* years for having the guts to get up and do it.

What can anybody say??

spendius
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 04:27 pm
@spendius,
And Brittini hasn't even got close to bad from what I've read.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 04:48 pm
@spendius,
Do you still play your Johnny Cash records Frank?
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 05:19 pm
http://www.kens5.com/news/Sex-scandal-brings-five-year-sentence-for-North-Texas-teacher-166651426.html

Colleps said she cannot afford her attorney for an appeal, so one will be appointed for her. She has 30 days to appeal the decision.
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 05:23 pm
@BillRM,
Where's the USSC Bill. Is a beautiful woman thrown in jail unconstitutionally something it is not bothered about?

Jeeze- you have lost the plot.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 07:08 pm
@spendius,
Spendius she does have an appeal bond of 15k so maybe we should take up a collection.

She better looking then Zimmerman after all.

Drunk
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 08:23 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
It's the usual stuff. They are all dupes. By implication you are not. And yet, in your eagerness, you have been duped into thinking that some evil priests are capable of undermining Catholic theology.


I didn't think that at all, but I sure know that the top brass sure undermined Catholic theology. While these men of god dithered and made lame excuses up and down the ranks, probably to cover their own asses [ you really think that none of them have been boinking boys or each other], they illustrated that they are just glorified [no pun intended] bureaucrats, trying to protect their cash cow.

The dupes are folks like you who keep buying into the crap you are fed.

JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Aug, 2012 08:27 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
But suppose all the war crimes are founded in the control of female sexuality.


Or in the third suction cup of the eighth arm of octopuses.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2012 03:31 am
@JTT,
Quote:
I didn't think that at all, but I sure know that the top brass sure undermined Catholic theology.


It is impossible to undermine Catholic theology no matter how discreditable those temporarily in charge of it might be. The Constitution cannot be undermined by the behaviour of people temporarily operating it.

Both can only be undermined intellectually. And solipsistic special pleading assertions are the opposite of that.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2012 04:09 am
@JTT,
Quote:
Or in the third suction cup of the eighth arm of octopuses.


You have a lot of reading to do JT and you would be well advised to get on doing it rather than wasting your time pouring out your emotionally driven prejudices which serve no other purposes than to display your ignorance and to flatter those sharing it.

We have been informed of the last resting place of the semen discharges of the chief of the IMF and of a president. Where were the last resting places of the semen discharges of the four footballers? Were there any? Probably I suppose.

Would Monica, 22 at the time, have performed her power related duties for a fork-truck driver?

Did you enjoy the song? I split my sides. Bad girls indeed. As long as the Texas courts approve. A sort of bureaucratically authorised badness.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Sexual freedom is sexual degeneracy - Discussion by Luxin
Harvey Weinstein: Git, ya varmint. - Discussion by edgarblythe
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/04/2025 at 05:15:39