Romney 2012?

I think Mittens just flipped on public TV! "We don't need to kill all these people just teach them not to be violent". 5 minutes later "we need to kill these people"

Don't bother, he lost.

Obama never was able to best Romney in any of the 3 debates.

Even the Faux Nubs Poll on the 3rd debate disagrees with you Waterdude

Romney 38%, Obama 62%

Rap

These polls credit vituperance more than anything else.

By that standard, Obama did win, as he was much more passionate than Romney.

Again (and no one seems to be arguing this against this contention) Romney didn't have to crush Obama as he did in debate #1, he just had to to appear presidential.

He did, and so he won.

so there.

nana nana boo boo.

dude lives in a bitter little fucked up world of his own, doesn't he rock?

don't get on his grass, man...

like a poodle on a squirrel.

Kinda trying to redefine the game there, aren't you, Finn? Yes, Romney appears presidential. So did Dennis Haysbert on "24". Of the two, I'd pick Haysbert. Romney would be fine playing a president on TV. In real life? Nah. Once again, all style, no substance. Why do his "5-point plans" always deal only in vague platitudes and never in concrete details?

it's on the internet, man...

Obama:
"And Governor, we have checked your website - several times. And the math is still wrong."

No, I'm acknowledging the parameters of the games, it's you who are trying to redefine them.

Irrespective of whether snap polls show Obama as the winner (I'm sure you accepted them when they had Romeny winning the second debate) Romney won.

The winner of this debate had nothing to do with what the solid supporters of either candidate might think.

All Romney had to do was to convince undecided voters that he could be Commander-in-Chief.

He did.

Be my guest.

no, we'll meet somewhere neutral...

and I'll pay my own tab.

I'll keep you posted...

Coward

That's easily explained because Obama and his administration
have the toughest time with common sense and logic

whatever you think...

I think you are a coward.

If you are coming to Dallas, let's meet.

Which snap polls had Romney winning the second debate?

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/17/instant-reaction-polls-show-narrow-obama-advantage-in-second-debate/

Just like Romney, you just say whatever you think sounds good. No research, no accuracy. Just bluster and bullshit.

What's really amazing is that you don't seem to care that Romney has abandoned all the positions he took earlier this year. On every issue, he has changed to a moderate position. Tonight he basically supported Obama's foreign policy and repudiated his former NeoCon warmongering. But you don't give a ****. Because you never believed him in the first place, and the only thing he represents is the only hope you have to not have Obama in charge for another for years.

You still have nothing to be FOR - only things to be against. It's pathetic.

Cycloptichorn

I have family in dallas. long before you decided you were from there...

maybe we should meet at lace in Arlington.

you won't have cronies there...