@McGentrix,
Quote:
Obama put the 2 committees together to advise him on economics because he is a bit of a retard in that area considering he has nursed from the public teat his entire life and has no knowledge of how business works.
I would wager he knows as much about it as you do. I don't find your sentence here to be convincing of any sort of argument you are putting forward; it's just an emotional exhortation on your part.
Quote:
He hand picked people to be on the committees and they released reports but because 100% of the people on the committee don't all agree, and never will progressive democrats ever agree on something, you get to just discount the findings?
In fact, 100% didn't need to agree to the document in question in order for it to be an official recommendation. Just 2/3rds, which is 66%. It failed to garner that many votes - lots of ideas do. Your exaggeration of this point doesn't lend credence to the argument you are trying to make.
Quote:
btw, McNerney was named Chairman of the President's Export Council by President Barack Obama. The only thing sloppy in this is your stubborn inability to think beyond your programming.
You still haven't admitted that you didn't read the letter he wrote and didn't note the fact that he was writing 'on behalf of the members of the committee appointed by the private sector.' And not on behalf of the entire committee. The letter you link to isn't an official finding or recommendation; it's a group of businesspeople stating that their corporate taxes should be lowered, so they can be 'more competitive.' But you presented it as if it was some sort of official finding.
Which one of us is unable to think past their programming, exactly? The one who made not one but two errors in their posting and one who says that facts don't matter, because the other guy is a socialist or something.
Cycloptichorn