89
   

Why does the Universe exist?

 
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Sat 18 Aug, 2012 09:31 am
@JLNobody,
Quote:
the equally absurd construct of nothingness.
I for one JL see nothing absurd about the concept. In fact it seems much more likely than our present state, much easier to posit compared with today's huge, complex somethingness seemingly impossible to account for
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Sat 18 Aug, 2012 01:51 pm
@dalehileman,
If the universe, despite its lack of "finitude," has no "outside"--or even no "before" its creation--we are stuck with two absurdities. That does not disprove the possibility of their reality. By the same token, my sense of the absurdity of the notion of "nothingness"--as well as "infinity" and "finitude"--does not take from them their utility. I think, with Nietzsche, that a notion can be useful without being absolutely "true."
dalehileman
 
  1  
Sat 18 Aug, 2012 02:56 pm
@JLNobody,
Quote:
If the universe, despite its lack of "finitude," has no "outside"
A lack of finitude presumably would make it infinite in which case the idea of an “outside” seems superfluous

However JL for various intuitional reasons I can’t feature one infinite

Quote:
--or even no "before" its creation--we are stuck with two absurdities.
I presume you mean (1) the q, Why does anything exist at all? and (2) the idea of nothingness

Quote:
That does not disprove the possibility of their reality.
If by “that” you mean the two topics above of course it doesn’t, it isn’t intended to. Both the q and the idea are very real but I still can’t see anything absurd about either

Quote:
By the same token, my sense of the absurdity of the notion of "nothingness"--as well as "infinity" and "finitude"--does not take from them their utility.
Of course your sense has no effect whatever on such ideas but I still can’t see anything absurd about them, you still need to elaborate for the benefit of the Average Clod (me)

JLNobody
 
  1  
Sat 18 Aug, 2012 10:54 pm
@dalehileman,
I "sense"--and this, I suppose, is just me--an element of "absurdity" in virtually everything. By that I mean arbitrariness/artificiality, paradox, relativity and ambiguity. But I must add that I do not see this as bad, as a failing of Reality. It's just the way the world is, and, frankly, I embrace it. I would dislike a world more in keeping with the metaphysical ideals of Plato.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Sun 19 Aug, 2012 09:46 am
@JLNobody,
Quote:
--an element of "absurdity" in virtually everything.
In accordance with the general idea that nothing is entirely anything while everything is partly something else, I’m forced to agree. Absurdity being less prominent in the notions of existence and nothingness however, a clarification is still in order
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Sun 19 Aug, 2012 10:04 am
@JLNobody,
While I do agree with what you say, I simultaneously feel that the source of the greatest absurdities is invariably human preconception. It is cause for both laughter and crying.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Sun 19 Aug, 2012 10:53 am
@Cyracuz,
Quote:
It is cause for both laughter and crying.
And wonder, and contemplation as well
JLNobody
 
  1  
Sun 19 Aug, 2012 11:00 am
@dalehileman,
Wow! How pleasant to agree with what the two of you have to say on the matter. Look at what my signature line has to say on civil discourse.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Sun 19 Aug, 2012 11:21 am
@JLNobody,
Quote:
my signature line
Forgive me JL but where does one find it

http://onelook.com/?w=signature+line&ls=a
JLNobody
 
  1  
Sun 19 Aug, 2012 09:56 pm
@dalehileman,
At the bottom of my posts. It says: " The spirit of civil conversation consists in building on another's observation, not overturning it."
dalehileman
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 10:07 am
@JLNobody,
Quote:
At the bottom of my posts.
Forgive me JL but I don’t see it anywhere. Perhaps glitch or latent option on my side
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 10:33 am
@dalehileman,
I think you have to go into the settings of your own profile and enable signature lines. They don't show by default I think.
JLNobody
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 10:40 am
@dalehileman,
Strange, I don't see a signature line below your posts, but I do for Cryacuz and many others.
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 11:07 am
@JLNobody,
I suspect that as dale is apparently unfamiliar with signature lines, he probably doesn't have one.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 11:58 am
Quote:
Strange, I don't see a signature line below your posts,
Perhaps because I never composed one

Quote:
but I do for Cryacuz and many others.
I don’t see one ‘neath Cyr. As I said, maybe there’s a kind of software subtlety at work
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 12:00 pm
@Cyracuz,
Quote:
They don't show by default I think.
Doubtless
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 12:01 pm
@Cyracuz,
Quote:
, he probably doesn't have one.
Surely that’s it
“Latent option,” as I described it

But let’s get back to The Universe
north
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 02:13 pm
@dalehileman,

Quote:
, he probably doesn't have one.

Quote:
Surely that’s it
“Latent option,” as I described it


Quote:
But let’s get back to The Universe


yes lets

the existence of the Universe has nothing to do with thought
dalehileman
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 02:27 pm
@north,
Quote:
the existence of the Universe has nothing to do with thought
Well North I’m not so sure I agree, depending on how you define “thought”

http://able2know.org/topic/196343-1
north
 
  1  
Mon 20 Aug, 2012 02:48 pm
@dalehileman,

Quote:
the existence of the Universe has nothing to do with thought
Well North I’m not so sure I agree, depending on how you define “thought”

http://able2know.org/topic/196343-1

[/quote]

how ever you define " thought " whether without or with god is irrelevant , really

the Universe doen't care

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 06:49:21