45
   

Do you think Zimmerman will be convicted of murder?

 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 04:08 pm
@firefly,
For one thing anyone found not guilty should be make financial whole plus interest on the funds spend in mounting a defense.

At least innocent men and women would then be far less likely to need to plea guilty even if they are innocent and the state have a weak case beside.

If the state have the funds to warehouse a larger percent of our total population in prison then any other major country in the world the state should have the funds to make people whole when and if they are found not guilty by a jury of their peers.

What we have not is almost a police state where if the state charge you with a serous crime you rarely are able to get your day before a jury at least 9 out of ten plus does not get to do so.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 04:14 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
For one thing anyone found not guilty should be make financial whole plus interest on the funds spend in mounting a defense.
...


Not good enough. We need to toss the entire "adversarial" system of justice in favor of the sort of 'inquisitorial' system found in France in which the common incentive of all parties involved in the process is to determine facts. NOBODY should ever have any sort of a career/money incentive to simply put people in prison. The job of DA should not exist, it attracts the wrong kind of people by its very nature.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 04:54 pm
@gungasnake,
Interesting idea gunasnake but whatever path we take we can not keep going down the one we are now on.

Oh Firefly claimed I am a racist and yet she unlike me seems to have no problem with having more black men in prisons then in colleges!!!!!!!

In our so call justice system where even an upper middle class person a lot of the time is force into plea deals due to financial considerations alone the poor underclass that contain a lot more blacks then whites get it in the back.

By percents of population we have roughly ten times the numbers of our citizens in prison then the UK does and yet their society seems to function just fine.

gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 06:18 pm
@BillRM,
What we have now is a prison/industrial complex with privatly run prisons and even cases of bribing judges to send as many people to prison as possible, often for terrifyingly minor ****.

I mean, that's aside from the obvious fact that we could eliminate 70% of all urban crime in a single day by the simple expedient of eliminating the "War on Drugs(TM)" but, again, the main roadblock to that is going to be public unions and the demoKKKrat party.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 06:48 pm
@gungasnake,
Sorry but the private prisons coming on line are not own for the most part by democrats and I can see lobbing for hard prison time for late library books in our future.

Nor is it democrats that would prefer to see money spend on prisons then universities.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 08:44 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
For one thing anyone found not guilty should be make financial whole plus interest on the funds spend in mounting a defense.

So, you want the state of California to reimburse O.J. Simpson for the cost if his defense--plus interest?
Quote:
the poor underclass that contain a lot more blacks then whites get it in the back.

Trayvon Martin got it in the chest--from George Zimmerman.
Quote:
By percents of population we have roughly ten times the numbers of our citizens in prison then the UK does and yet their society seems to function just fine.

Maybe that's because they don't have the right to carry guns in the U.K.



BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 10:13 pm
@firefly,
Let see it your thinking that it is far better to have thousands of middle class and below persons who had been found innocent by a jury of their peers financially ruin along with their families in order to keep a once or less OJ type case a decade from being make whole??!!!!????

In any case as it is only a person with OJ resources or greater can afford to mount a defense in our system.

If we are not willing to fix the system where only less then one in ten get the protection of a jury trial maybe the most honest thing to do is to just grant in an open manner the agents of the state the power to imprisoned anyone they care to?

Oh guns and our prison population only a small fraction of our prison population is in prison due to gun crimes and in fact the majority of our prison population is in prison for non violence crimes.

You could remove all the people in prison for violence crimes and our population would still be far greater then that of the UK.

Next comment of your it would seems that you would had prefer that instead of Trayvon being kill with a bullet to the chest that Zimmerman would had been kill by having his brains being beaten out on the sidewalk.

An interesting idea that it is far better for a victim to have his brain beaten out of him then for the attacker to die from a gun shot.

To sum up your positions it is better for thousands to be financially ruin then for one OJ type case to be make whole and it is better if the victim would died from a beating then the attacker die from a gun shot.
firefly
 
  3  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 10:27 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
For one thing anyone found not guilty should be make financial whole plus interest on the funds spend in mounting a defense.

So, you want the state of California to reimburse O.J. Simpson for the cost if his defense--plus interest?

You still haven't answered that question. O.J. was found not guilty at his criminal trial.
Quote:
it would seems that you would had prefer that instead of Trayvon being kill with a bullet to the chest that Zimmerman would had been kill by having his brains being beaten out on the sidewalk.

No, I would have preferred that George Zimmerman had followed the instructions of the 911 dispatcher, and not pursued Martin, and not provoked a confrontation.

Trayvon Martin was minding his own business and not bothering anyone. Zimmerman thought he looked "suspicious", so he called 911. That was sufficient action for a neighborhood watch volunteer. Then he should have done nothing more--the police were on their way. Zimmerman should not have continued to follow Martin. When confronted, Martin may have been trying to defend his own life from this gun-toting nut.

This case is in court where it belongs. It is not a clear-cut case of justifiable self defense. Until it is legally determined to be justifiable self defense, it simply remains a homicide, committed by George Zimmerman.




cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 11:06 pm
@firefly,
That's what I've been saying all along; the trial should be left to the jury, the attorneys, and the judge.

Making assumptions is just plain stupid!
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 11:28 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
No, I would have preferred that George Zimmerman had followed the instructions of the 911 dispatcher, and not pursued Martin, and not provoked a confrontation.


That would had been good and with hindsight a better judgment call however if Trayvon had not turn and attack Zimmerman that would had been far far better as following someone on a public street even against a 911 OP request is not a crime or a moral failing however an assault is both a crime and a moral failing. Even an assault of someone who is annoying you by following you on a public street.

I am assuming that you are not suggesting for a second that if someone annoy you by any actions that is legal you have some right to attack him for doing so or that if you do attack him he had lost the right of self defense?

With you one can never never be sure of what you are claiming.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 11:32 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
No, I would have preferred that George Zimmerman had followed the instructions of the 911 dispatcher,
Having no authority to give instructions, none were given. Here is yet another example of Firefly purposefully mis using words in the attempt to make unjustified claims. What 911 operators have to offer is advise for citizen action as well as status reports of the actions of the agents of the collective.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 11:40 pm
@hawkeye10,
Hawkeye the only one who is responsible for Trayvon attack is Trayvon and I had yet to hear what Zimmerman had done that is not 100 percent legal in following him on a public street.

Given the attack by Trayvon it would seems that Zimmerman was proven 100 percent correct in judging that there was something very wrong about this gentleman that call for an eye being kept on him.

hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2012 11:57 pm
@BillRM,
There is in my opinion no information in the public domain that even suggests that George might be guilty of a crime, much less any which proves that he is.

BTW, did you see where Martins parents and their lawyer are demanding that Georges bail be revoked based upon his alleged lies to the court about the paypal account? This is the kind of barbaric desires that George now finds himself up against, these people would lynch him in a heartbeat if they could get away with it.
Quote:
Asked whether knowledge of the money might have made a difference to Lester, who presided at Zimmerman's bond hearing, O'Mara said, "It might have."
O'Mara could not explain why Zimmerman didn't disclose the funds, but said he didn't think his client had meant to deceive anyone.
"I consider it an oversight because I don't see anything else that suggests that Mr. Zimmerman has been insincere or dishonest," he told CNN's Erin Burnett on Friday. "The moment I asked him about it, he acknowledged it and forwarded the money."
Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump said Zimmerman's failure to reveal that he had the money shows that he is being dishonest.
"If his testimony at the bond hearing is any indication of what is to come, then the lying has already begun," Crump said.
"This is going to say a lot about whether Trayvon Martin can get a fair trial," he told Burnett. "If he (Lester) doesn't revoke his bond, the court should severely sanction him so George Zimmerman understands you cannot lie to the court."

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/27/justice/florida-zimmerman-money/index.html?section=cnn_latest
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 12:16 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:
Not good enough. We need to toss the entire "adversarial" system of justice in favor of the sort of 'inquisitorial' system found in France in which the common incentive of all parties involved in the process is to determine facts.
That is not going to solve much if I am correct that the worst flaws in the system today stem from Government abuse of power. So long as the government is willing to abuse the citizens the systems are irrelevant, only reform or removal of the government will solve the problem.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 05:28 am
@hawkeye10,
Speaking of funds being generated by the public over this matter I would love to get the back story of Trayvon's mother trademarking his name and the saying appearing on tee shirts and coffee mugs ETC.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 05:31 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
So long as the government is willing to abuse the citizens the systems are irrelevant,
only reform or removal of the government will solve the problem.
Is it like IDOLATRY??
First, u create the thing, shape it and paint it the way u want
and then u feel a duty to WORSHIP the thing that owes its existence to U.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 06:10 am
Comment about our friend Firefly thinking of blaming the victim in this case for daring to following his attacker on the public streets.

By Firefly thinking as expressed here many many times a woman can not be at fault for being sexually attack no matter how she act or wear or in what parts of town she walk through however Zimmerman can be blame for the attack on him by Trayvon for following him on a public street.

Once more we see how inconsistent she can be.

The only one responsible for Trayvon death is Trayvon in my opinion.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 06:14 am
@BillRM,
That one was a bit complicated, sorry...

Private prisons appear to be housing some 100K convicts in a country in which they say every 100'th person is in prison meaning that ordinary public prisons still house the vast majority of convicts and also meaning that an awful lot of prison personnel would have to find honest jobs the day the "War on Drugs" ended since most urban crime would evaporate along with the end of the WonD.

I assume also that most of the people who would be thrown into the job market by ending the WonD are SEIU members, the implications being fairly obvious.

http://unionwatch.org/the-role-of-the-prison-guards-union-in-california%E2%80%99s-troubled-prison-system/

Quote:
...The facts observed over the past 40 years suggests the cycle described by Ms. Petersilia is basically accurate: higher incarceration leads to greater union influence, which in turn leads to still higher incarceration, and thus higher union membership, revenues, and political influence. Whatever the initial causes of California’s prison problems, the prison guards’ institutional pro-incarceration and anti-rehabilitation agenda has calcified a broken correctional system....


The SEIU, of course, is not any sort of a financial pillar of the GOP....
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 06:23 am
@gungasnake,
Sorry but you can not picked out one element of the prison industry and declared that element bare the majority of the blame when there are many stakeholders in the current system.

Whole communities in fact whole counties are almost completely depended on the prison industry in Florida as is many vendors and...............so on.

The counties that are so depended on the prison industry are very very must are GOP control areas of Florida.

The unions that you hate are not all that powerful and the members who work in the prison industry in Florida are very very poorly paid as a matter of fact.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 06:44 am
@BillRM,
The Florida legal system has been a factor in why I've never been willing to take jobs or live in Florida, just reading about it gives me the creeps.

http://able2know.org/topic/47061-1
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/terror/cases/snowden.html

Other than that however, articles such as the one I noted do in fact list prison employees unions as a major factor if not the most major factor in perpetuating the current problems.

http://unionwatch.org/the-role-of-the-prison-guards-union-in-california%E2%80%99s-troubled-prison-system/

Quote:

To provide an understanding the CCPOA’s objectives in and influence over California’s prison system, it may be helpful to recite a brief history of the prison system since the CCPOA’s inception over 50 years ago:

1957: California Correctional Officers Association (the predecessor to the CCPOA) is founded.
-
1972: In its initial decades, the CCOA largely backed conservative political measures. For example, in 1972 the CCOA backedProp 17, which amended the California Constitution reinstating capital punishment following the California Supreme Court decision in People v. Anderson, holding the death penalty violated the state constitutional prohibition against “cruel or unusual punishment.”
-
1973: The CCOA reaches 3,200 members. It is still dwarfed by the 102,000 member California State Employees Association.
-
1976: California becomes the second state after Maine to abolish indeterminate sentencing, which had explicitly embraced rehabilitation as a correctional goal and tied a prisoner’s release date to his or her rehabilitative progress.
-
1978: Gov. Jerry Brown signs the Dills Act into law, giving public employees collective bargaining rights.
-
1980: California has 12 prisons. Prison guards make approximately $21,000 per year.
-
1980: Don Novey takes over as president of CCPOA; although no longer working in a prison, Novey continues to receive his $59,900 salary, in addition to his new $60,000 union chief salary.
-
1983: By the end of Jerry Brown’s term as governor, total prison population increases by 9,899, from 24,471 to 34,640.
-
1983: CCPOA successfully negotiates a 2.5% at 55 retirement package.
-
1984: CCPOA membership swells to 10,000.
-
1990: CCPOA contributes $1 million to Pete Wilson.
-
1990: The CCPOA contributes over $80,000 to an unknown opponent of Senator John Vasconcellos, D-Santa Clara, who led opposition to a prison-building bond as an assemblyman in 1990. The much more visible Vasconcellos only narrowly defeated the unknown CCPOA-backed candidate.
-
1991: By the end of George Deukmejian’s term as governor, total prison population explodes by 62,669, from 34,640 to 97,309. The Corrections’ share of the General Fund saw an 81% increase over the past 8 years.
-
July 1993: The CCPOA is one of the top 10 state political campaign contributors with more than $1 million in contributions, substantially to Republican candidates, including a challenger to an assemblyman who had repeatedly called for slowing growth in prison operating budgets.
-
1992: Prison guards’ pay averages $45,000 per year.
-
1994: With the help of CCPOA’s $101,000 support, Californians passed Proposition 184, the nation’s toughest three-strikes law mandating 25-years-to-life sentences for most felony offenders with two previous serious convictions.

http://unionwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/kowal-jun11-5.jpg

1995: States around the country spend more building prisons than colleges for the first time in history.
-
1998: Don Novey, president of the CCPOA, contributes $2.1 million to the Gray Davis campaign.
-
1998: The CCPOA donates a total of $5.3 million to legislative races, the Gray Davis campaign, and voter initiatives. It was the No. 1 donor to California legislative races at $1.9 million. It contributed $2.3 million into Davis’s campaign, placed television spots for Davis in the conservative Central Valley, and helped fund a bank of telephone callers before the election. The CCPOA contributed $3 million to Gray Davis during his term in office.
-
1998: Since approximately 1980, California tripled its number of prisons and increased its inmate population to nearly 160,000 at 33 prisons and 38 work camps.
-
1998: Gov. Pete Wilson, who receives $1.5 million in CCPOA contributions in 1998, vetoes pay raises for other state workers while CCPOA members obtain a 12% pay increase, bringing top pay from $46,200 to $50,820. State university instructors earn between $32,000 and $37,000. By the end of Pete Wilson’s term as governor in 1999, total prison population increased by 67,875, from 97,309 to an estimated 165,166.
-
1999: After the Legislature approves a bill to establish a $1 million pilot program to provide alternative sentencing for some nonviolent parole offenders—estimated to save taxpayers $600 million a year—the CCPOA opposes the bill. Governor Gray Davis then vetoes the bill. The CCPOA also persuades Gov. Davis to close three privately run prisons, even though they housed inmates at substantially lower costs than state-run facilities.
-
2000: The CCPOA contributes at least $75,000 to the opponents of Proposition 36, the 2000 initiative that replaced incarceration with substance abuse treatment for certain nonviolent offenders.

http://unionwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/kowal-jun11-6.jpg

2002: CCPOA contributes $1 million to Gray Davis’s campaign. The CCPOA contributes $200,000 to defeat Assemblyman Phil Wyman in 2002, an advocate of private prisons. The CCPOA negotiates an increase to prison guards’ pay estimated between 28% and 37%, at a price tag of $500 million per year. Senior guards earn $52,700 a year, compared to $30,000 for a senior supervisor in Texas. The California Legislature approves $170 million in extra prison spending. In addition to granting correctional officers a major boost in pay, the labor pact permitted officers to call in sick without a doctor’s note confirming the illness. With the new policy in place, prison officers called in sick 500,000 more hours in 2002 than in 2001, a 27% increase. “Our overtime would have been below 2001, or real close, had it not been for that 500,000-hour increase,” said Wendy Still, the main budget analyst for the Department of Corrections. Corrections officers called in sick 27 percent more often last year than they did in 2001, for an additional 500,000 lost hours. More than a third of the overtime logged last year was to compensate for guards who called in sick, according to the Bureau of State Audits. The California Department of Finance requests $70 million to cover unexpected prison costs from 2001. In December, Gray Davis asks lawmakers for $10 billion in emergency cuts to other state programs.
-
2003: Gray Davis asks the Legislature to approve another $150 million for prison system’s budget. The CCPOA contributes $25,000 to Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, a San Francisco Democrat, three months after giving $12,000 to Senate Republican Leader Jim Brulte of Rancho Cucamonga. CCPOA members receive a 7% raise, pushing average annual take-home pay to $64,000. California’s prison budget is estimated at $5.2 billion.
-
2004: The CCPOA spends over $1 million to defeat Prop 66, the initiative that would have limited the crimes that triggered a life sentence under the Three Strikes law.
-
2005: The CCPOA defeats Governor Schwarzenegger’s plan to “reduce the prison population by as much as 20,000, mainly through a program that diverted parole violators into rehabilitation efforts: drug programs, halfway houses and home detention.” Spending on California’s penal system constitutes approximately 7% of the state’s general funds. CCPOA membership reaches 26,000.
-
2006: The average CCPOA correctional officer receives compensation worth $73,248 per year. Over 900 workers added $50,000 or more to their base salaries in overtime pay; over 1,600 officers’ total earnings topped $110,000. (Kathryne Tafolla Young, The Privatization of California Correctional Facilities: A Population-Based Approach, 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 438, 441-42 (2007).)
-
2007: Following a 2007 ruling requiring the state to fix its prison overcrowding problem, the Legislature passes a $3.5 billion bond package to finance the construction of new prisons, yet four years later not a single new facility has been built.
-
2008: The CCPOA contributes $2 million to Jerry Brown’s gubernatorial campaign. The CCPOA contributes $1 million against Prop 5, a measure to reduce prison overcrowding by providing treatment rather than prison sentences for nonviolent drug users.
-
2011: Gov. Brown’s proposed Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget funds the prison system $9.19 billion, nearly 7.2% of the entire state budget. It costs an average of $44,563 a year to house each of California’s approximately 158,000 inmates in a system at roughly 200% of capacity. The national average is $28,000.


Quote:

By 2011, CCPOA members are among the most generously compensated public workers in the state, even while their union resists policy changes to bring prison overcrowding, recidivism, and costs under control. As observed by Rich Tatum, a 33-year prisons veteran and president of the California Correctional Supervisors Organization, “It does seem at times like the union is running the department.” John Irwin, a retired professor and commentator of California’s correctional system, worries that “the wardens don’t feel they have much control of what goes on. The cliques – mostly led by sergeants – at the prisons are very strong, and the union, of course, backs them up when they get into trouble.”


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.68 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 08:52:40