@wmwcjr,
It's not at all a personal attack, wmwcjr. It's simply one way to illustrate that Dave is completely mistaken on his analysis of how negative Yes/No questions work in the English language.
Of course, I didn't for a moment believe that any of those questions had any measure of accuracy. Dave said that he could simply answer "Yes" to those questions. See the result in my post just before this one.
I'm surprised that no one has addressed it. This is a good illustration of how prescriptions become established. That exactly how the split infinitive, the that/which, the no can for permission, the no 'was' for counterfactuals rules developed.
Some guy or other, who knows nothing of how language works devises some cockamamie idea about language and some other idiot repeats it and it takes on a life of its own.