11
   

Leon Panetta Predicts Israel Will Bomb Iran This Spring (2012)

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 03:46 pm
Interesting that the USS Abraham Lincoln's crossing through the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most peaceful things about the standoff. Bombings in Delhi and Bangkok and a failed attempt in Georgia. Where next?
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 05:40 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:


I knew that would flush you out.


I have to admit, it is fun indulging the psychopaths here on A2K.

Quote:
You've modified your position.

Quote:
A part of this animosity stems from the Palestinian issue.


That's not your original claim. Your original claim was that Iran's animosity was primarily based on the Palestinian issue.

Please don't lie and contend otherwise, as I may have to seek conformation from Set who spits nickles whenever I do.

If you've conceded you were originally wrong, good for you.


Sorry, but I refuse to enable your delusions. I never said that Iran's animosity was primarily based on the Palestinian issue. Get help.

Quote:
Quote:
How do you come to this conclusion?


Because Israel has faced numerous crisis they might have quashed with a nuclear threat, let alone a nuclear strike.

How long do you think the US would put up with thousands of missile attacks from Mexico before we threated a nuclear retaliation?

How long do you think North Korea would put up with thousands of missile attacks from South Korea before they responded with a nuke?

How long do you think Pakistan would put up with thousands of missile attacks from India before they responded with a nuke?

No country equipped with nukes would put up with the **** with which Israel has endured.


A nuclear strike would be an absolutely stupid way to respond to the “crisis” that you mention. For all they’re worth these missiles amount to glorified model rockets with explosives, and neither the US, nor N Korea, nor Pakistan would be asinine enough to respond to these attacks with nukes. The North Korean leadership may have mental issues, but they don’t come close to approaching you in that regard. You're an absolute loon.

Quote:
Quote:
Likewise, Israel's counter to a Persian hegemony is understandable, but not legitimate.


Really?


Really. I say that in light of the fact that Israel is that region’s hegemon. I agree that a legitimate objective for both is to hinder a single power seizing the region. Iran would be able to counter Israel’s hegemony with nukes.

Quote:
Opposition to US, Chinese, Russian etc hegemony is not legitimate?

I guess you're all for fsaying "**** You" to Tibet.


You’re arguing that along with checks against Chinese and Russian hegemony, a check to US hegemony is legitimate?

I agree with you.

Quote:
A legitimate objective for both of them is to hinder a single power seizing the region. There is no fear, what-so-ever, that Israel will attempt such an end, but maybe you have enough **** behind your ears to think Iran won't either.


I agree about hindering any country’s hegemony. Taking into account the gist of your positions concerning geopolitics, it is you that has **** behind your ears when you say that opposition to US hegemony is legitimate. Do you not keep up with the very crap you yourself write?

Quote:
Quote:
What exactly does "recognition of Israel's right to exist" mean?


That's really hard for you to understand?

The Syrian regime is totally fucked up, but does anyone question the right of Syria to exist?


I just want to be sure about what you’re trying to say.

The Syrian people have a right to exist. The Syrian (Assad) regime as it represses the peoples of Syria does not have a right to exist. Likewise, the people of Israel have a right to exist. The Zionist regime in Israel, as it necessarily represses the Palestinian peoples in order to exist, does not have a right to exist.

Quote:
Iran wanting nukes because Israel has them is perfectly understanable given the fact that Iran want to rid the region of Israel and rule it.


Talk about specious assumptions.

Quote:
Iran has no reason to fear Israeli nukes unless they insist upon dominating the region. They want them so they can dominate the region, and most certainly not because they give a **** about Palestinians.


Ditto.

Quote:
Quote:
Well then there should be no problem to Iran alleged wanting of nukes seeing as how North Korea has them, and yet utterly fails to dominate their region.


Are you really making this argument?


I really, really am making this argument.

Quote:
Quote:
I don't mean to answer for izzy, but one thing is giving the Iranian regime the benefit of the doubt about your allegations of "nuclear ambitions," quite another thing is Iranians dying in the street to overthrow it. You are conflating the two issues.


Again, are you really making this argument?


Again, I really, really am making this argument.

Quote:
There is no shortage of A2Kers who disagree with everything I write, but I would be amazed if even the most severe (but intelligent) of my critics will support this absurd argument.


You don’t explain why you believe this is absurd.

Quote:
You, predictably, rely upon the usage of "alleged" to undermine arguments that Iran is seeking nukes.

Why?

Either because you insist upon taking any position that can be seen as an attack on Israel or the US, or you believe the mullahs.

(If there is an alternative reason, please inform me)


Because up to now all we have is speculation and circumstantial evidence that they’re seeking nukes.

Quote:
I tend to believe the former, but if you lay claim to the latter than you need to argue for the integrity of the mullahs...the ones that ordered the slaughter of members of the Iranian opposition.


See option C above.

Quote:
Quote:
That's precisely how the CIA and Mossad tend to operate, though. They even train and support the secret police of son-of-a-bitch dictators that they consider their very own.


Gosh you really are an ideological tool. Where do you live and what do you look like so I can cross the street whenever I see you.


Your funny jokes notwithstanding, so, you’re saying that the CIA and Mossad don’t support the secret police of son-of-a-bitch dictators that they consider their very own? It’s difficult to get a grasp of your position when all you do is joke and spew irrelevant nonsense. If you don’t agree with what I’ve said, explain why.

Quote:
How to explain your hatred for Israel so that you will go so far as to suggest the theocracy's opposition are CIA or Mossad puppets?


Your completely irrelevant assumptions about my emotions aside, are you saying that the CIA and Mossad don’t support the Iranian opposition? See my response above to your foolishness.

Quote:
Quote:
Imperialistic? Of course. It was done to further the US' sphere of influence. Do you think it was done for the benefit of the Libyan people? War Criminals? That seems to be defined by a matter of international consensus. What's the consensus on this?


Of course. Why did I think you might be other than a cartoon?


How is that cartoonish?

Quote:
Thanks. With this thread you have revealed your essence. I won't ignore you but I won't be wasting my time engaging you.


Ok.

Quote:
Out of curiousity, how did you come up with these opinions?

Parents? Friends? Weird pamphlets read in the dark corners of your bedroom?

Did a Jew steal the girl you longed for from afar?

Are you Jewish?

Are you convinced that agreeing with folks like izzy makes you cool?


I’ve read the histories of the US and Israel. You might want to try it. Careful though, you seem to be the kind of person who’s head would hurt in this endeavor. It’s probably best that you stick to watching FoxNews.
Advocate
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 07:33 pm
Here is an important piece that covers the Iranian mindset relative to Israel.


'Kill all Jews and annihilate Israel!' Iran's Ayatollah lays out legal and religious justification for attack
Israel Could Be Wiped Out in Nine Minutes, Manifesto Claims

By Reza Kahlili, WorldNetDaily.com, February 4, 2012

The Iranian government, through a website proxy, has laid out the legal and religious justification for the destruction of Israel and the slaughter of its people.

The doctrine includes wiping out Israeli assets and Jewish people worldwide.

Calling Israel a danger to Islam, the conservative website Alef, with ties to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the opportunity must not be lost to remove "this corrupting material. It is a "'jurisprudential justification" to kill all the Jews and annihilate Israel, and in that, the Islamic government of Iran must take the helm."

The article, written by Alireza Forghani, an analyst and a strategy specialist in Khamenei's camp, now is being run on most state-owned sites, including the Revolutionary Guards' Fars News Agency, showing that the regime endorses this doctrine.

Because Israel is going to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, Iran is justified in launching a pre-emptive, cataclysmic attack against the Jewish state, the doctrine argues.

On Friday, in a major speech at prayers, Khamenei announced that Iran will support any nation or group that attacks the "cancerous tumor" of Israel. Though his statement was seen by some in the West as fluff, there is substance behind it.

Iran's Defense Ministry announced this weekend that it test-fired an advanced two-stage, solid-fuel ballistic missile and boasted about successfully putting a new satellite into orbit, reminding the West that its engineers have mastered the technology for intercontinental ballistic missiles even as the Islamic state pushes its nuclear weapons program.

The commander of the Revolutionary Guards, Brig. Gen. Seyyed Mehdi Farahi, stated in August that the Safir missile, which is capable of transporting a satellite into space, can easily be launched parallel to the earth's orbit, which will transform it into an intercontinental ballistic missile. Western analysts didn't believe this would happen until 2015. Historically, orbiting a satellite is the criterion for crediting a nation with ICBM capability.

Forghani details the Islamic duty of jihad as laid out in the Quran for the sake of Allah and states that "primary jihad," according to some Shiite jurists, can only occur when the Hidden Imam, the Shiites' 12th Imam Mahdi, returns. Shiites believe Mahdi''s return will usher in Armageddon.

In the absence of the hidden Imam, Forghani says, "defensive jihad" could certainly take place when Islam is threatened, and Muslims must defend Islam and kill their enemies. To justify such action, Alef quotes the Shiites' first imam, Ali, who stated "Waging war against the enemies with whom war is inevitable and there is a strong possibility that in near future they will attack Muslims is a must and the duty of Muslims." In this regard, Ayatollah Khamenei has issued a fatwa in which he has even authorized carrying out primary jihad in the age of the absence of the Hidden imam under the authorization of Vali Faghih.

The article then quotes the Quran (Albaghara 2:191-193): "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers] … and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."

It is the duty for all Muslims to participate in this defensive jihad, Forghani says. A fatwa by the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini made it clear that any political domination by infidels over Muslims authorizes Muslims to defend Islam by all means. Iran now has the ICBM means to deliver destruction on Israel and soon will have nuclear warheads for those missiles.

In order to attack Iran, the article says, Israel needs the approval and assistance of America, and under the current passive climate in the United States, the opportunity must not be lost to wipe out Israel before it attacks Iran.

Under this pre-emptive defensive doctrine, several Ground Zero points of Israel must be destroyed and its people annihilated. Forghani cites the last census by the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics that shows Israel has a population of 7.5 million citizens of which a majority of 5.7 million are Jewish. Then it breaks down the districts with the highest concentration of Jewish people, indicating that three cities, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Haifa, contain over 60 percent of the Jewish population that Iran could target with its Shahab 3 ballistic missiles, killing all its inhabitants.

Forghani suggests that Iran's Sejil missile, which is a two-stage rocket with a trajectory and speed that make it impossible to intercept, should target such Israeli facilities as: the Rafael nuclear plant, which is the main nuclear engineering center of Israel; the Eilun nuclear plant; another Israeli reactor in Nebrin; and the Dimona reactor in the nuclear research center in Neqeb, the most critical nuclear reactor in Israel because it produces 90 percent enriched uranium for Israel's nuclear weapons.

Other targets, according to the article, include airports and air force bases such as the Sedot Mikha Air Base, which contains Jericho ballistic missiles and is located southwest of the Tel Nof Air Base, where aircraft equipped with nuclear weapons are based. Secondary targets include power plants, sewage treatment facilities, energy resources, and transportation and communication infrastructures.

Finally, Forghani says, Shahab 3 and Ghadr missiles can target urban settlements until the Israelis are wiped out.

Forghani claims that Israel could be destroyed in less than nine minutes and that Khamenei, as utmost authority, the Velayete Faghih (Islamic Jurist), also believes that Israel and America not only must be defeated but annihilated.

The radicals ruling Iran today not only posses over 1,000 ballistic missiles but are on the verge of ICBM delivery and have sufficient enriched uranium for six nuclear bombs even as they continue to highly enrich uranium despite four sets of U.N. sanctions.

izzythepush
 
  5  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 03:13 am
@Advocate,
What the Ayatollah says is inflammatory and offensive but it's not the same as what Israel is doing to the Palestinians on a daily basis. Sticks and stones and all that.

I'm sure the Ayatollah and Netanyahu are great pals underneath. Israel's aggression towards Iran and the Palestinians justifies the regime crushing opposition, and the Ayatollah's belicose rhetoric excuses the building of illegal settlements and keeps the far right in power. They're two sides of the same coin. Both are terrified of the Arab Spring.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  6  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 03:18 am
@InfraBlue,
Finn decided to look the other way a long time ago. He is unable to accept that people can be motivated solely out of sympathy for the Palestinian people. He obviously is motivated by far less noble sentiments, so accuses others of his own shortcomings.
InfraBlue
 
  4  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 11:58 am
@Advocate,
Oh, so there are nutcase extremists like Alireza Forghani with ties to the Iranian government. I guess that serves as a counter to the nutcase extremists within the Israeli government like Avigdor Lieberman who calls for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Israel.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 12:03 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
He is unable to accept that people can be motivated solely out of sympathy for the Palestinian people.


Nonsense. With very few exceptions, the only people who are depraved enough to support the Palestinians, are people who are depraved enough to also support sending innocent people to prison.

The Palestinians are evil. End of story.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 12:56 pm
@oralloy,
Any FBI profilers around your way Oralboy? You tick all the boxes.
1) Gun nut.
2) Obsession with violent computer games.
3) Recluse who hates towns/other people.
4) Narcissist.
5) Low IQ.
6) Inability to see things in terms other than absolutes.
7) Obsession with violent sex/ necrophilia.
8) Fear of the Death Penalty.
9) Avatar name derived from obsession with nuclear weapons/secret wish to be sodomised.


Just what have you got buried in your garden?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 03:23 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
violent computer games.


Liar.



izzythepush wrote:
5) Low IQ.


You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.



izzythepush wrote:
7) Obsession with violent sex/ necrophilia.


Liar/Liar.



izzythepush wrote:
8) Fear of the Death Penalty.


What "fear"? You mean "opposition to"?

I suppose you support the execution of innocent people as well. Figures that someone who supports the Palestinians would support executing innocent people.



izzythepush wrote:
secret wish to be sodomised.


Liar.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 04:58 pm
@oralloy,
So, BCBBB. like I said, Low IQ.
http://able2know.org/reply/post-4894081
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:06 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
like I said, Low IQ.


You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:09 pm
@oralloy,
C. Low IQ, predictable response, lack of imagination=Sad twat.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:13 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
C. Low IQ, predictable response, lack of imagination=Sad twat.


You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:26 pm
@oralloy,
Even when your predictability is pointed out to you, you still act in a predictable manner. I'm sorry I said you had a low IQ, that should be very low IQ.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:31 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Even when your predictability is pointed out to you, you still act in a predictable manner. I'm sorry I said you had a low IQ, that should be very low IQ.


You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:35 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Bombings in Delhi and Bangkok and a failed attempt in Georgia. Where next?


who knows, the Mossad works in strange and mysterious ways Razz
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:38 pm
@oralloy,
You get stupider by the minute.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 05:40 pm
@djjd62,
You may have a point, the Guardian said these bombings were very sloppy for an intelligence agency, unless that agency wanted them to be sloppy of course.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 06:57 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
You get stupider by the minute.


You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2012 06:57 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:
izzythepush wrote:
Bombings in Delhi and Bangkok and a failed attempt in Georgia. Where next?


who knows, the Mossad works in strange and mysterious ways Razz


Mossad had nothing to do with them. The bombings are Iran's way of throwing a tantrum.
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 12:46:52