@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
I knew that would flush you out.
I have to admit, it is fun indulging the psychopaths here on A2K.
Quote:You've modified your position.
Quote:A part of this animosity stems from the Palestinian issue.
That's not your original claim. Your original claim was that Iran's animosity was primarily based on the Palestinian issue.
Please don't lie and contend otherwise, as I may have to seek conformation from Set who spits nickles whenever I do.
If you've conceded you were originally wrong, good for you.
Sorry, but I refuse to enable your delusions. I never said that Iran's animosity was primarily based on the Palestinian issue. Get help.
Quote:Quote:How do you come to this conclusion?
Because Israel has faced numerous crisis they might have quashed with a nuclear threat, let alone a nuclear strike.
How long do you think the US would put up with thousands of missile attacks from Mexico before we threated a nuclear retaliation?
How long do you think North Korea would put up with thousands of missile attacks from South Korea before they responded with a nuke?
How long do you think Pakistan would put up with thousands of missile attacks from India before they responded with a nuke?
No country equipped with nukes would put up with the **** with which Israel has endured.
A nuclear strike would be an absolutely
stupid way to respond to the “crisis” that you mention. For all they’re worth these missiles amount to glorified model rockets with explosives, and neither the US, nor N Korea, nor Pakistan would be asinine enough to respond to these attacks with nukes. The North Korean leadership may have mental issues, but they don’t come close to approaching you in that regard. You're an absolute loon.
Quote:Quote:Likewise, Israel's counter to a Persian hegemony is understandable, but not legitimate.
Really?
Really. I say that in light of the fact that Israel is that region’s hegemon. I agree that a legitimate objective for both is to hinder a single power seizing the region. Iran would be able to counter Israel’s hegemony with nukes.
Quote:Opposition to US, Chinese, Russian etc hegemony is not legitimate?
I guess you're all for fsaying "**** You" to Tibet.
You’re arguing that along with checks against Chinese and Russian hegemony, a check to
US hegemony is legitimate?
I agree with you.
Quote:A legitimate objective for both of them is to hinder a single power seizing the region. There is no fear, what-so-ever, that Israel will attempt such an end, but maybe you have enough **** behind your ears to think Iran won't either.
I agree about hindering any country’s hegemony. Taking into account the gist of your positions concerning geopolitics, it is you that has **** behind your ears when you say that opposition to US hegemony is legitimate. Do you not keep up with the very crap you yourself write?
Quote:Quote:What exactly does "recognition of Israel's right to exist" mean?
That's really hard for you to understand?
The Syrian regime is totally fucked up, but does anyone question the right of Syria to exist?
I just want to be sure about what you’re trying to say.
The Syrian people have a right to exist. The Syrian (Assad) regime as it represses the peoples of Syria does not have a right to exist. Likewise, the people of Israel have a right to exist. The Zionist regime in Israel, as it necessarily represses the Palestinian peoples in order to exist, does not have a right to exist.
Quote:Iran wanting nukes because Israel has them is perfectly understanable given the fact that Iran want to rid the region of Israel and rule it.
Talk about specious assumptions.
Quote:Iran has no reason to fear Israeli nukes unless they insist upon dominating the region. They want them so they can dominate the region, and most certainly not because they give a **** about Palestinians.
Ditto.
Quote:Quote:Well then there should be no problem to Iran alleged wanting of nukes seeing as how North Korea has them, and yet utterly fails to dominate their region.
Are you really making this argument?
I really, really am making this argument.
Quote:Quote:I don't mean to answer for izzy, but one thing is giving the Iranian regime the benefit of the doubt about your allegations of "nuclear ambitions," quite another thing is Iranians dying in the street to overthrow it. You are conflating the two issues.
Again, are you really making this argument?
Again, I really, really am making this argument.
Quote:There is no shortage of A2Kers who disagree with everything I write, but I would be amazed if even the most severe (but intelligent) of my critics will support this absurd argument.
You don’t explain why you believe this is absurd.
Quote:You, predictably, rely upon the usage of "alleged" to undermine arguments that Iran is seeking nukes.
Why?
Either because you insist upon taking any position that can be seen as an attack on Israel or the US, or you believe the mullahs.
(If there is an alternative reason, please inform me)
Because up to now all we have is speculation and circumstantial evidence that they’re seeking nukes.
Quote:I tend to believe the former, but if you lay claim to the latter than you need to argue for the integrity of the mullahs...the ones that ordered the slaughter of members of the Iranian opposition.
See option C above.
Quote:Quote:That's precisely how the CIA and Mossad tend to operate, though. They even train and support the secret police of son-of-a-bitch dictators that they consider their very own.
Gosh you really are an ideological tool. Where do you live and what do you look like so I can cross the street whenever I see you.
Your funny jokes notwithstanding, so, you’re saying that the CIA and Mossad
don’t support the secret police of son-of-a-bitch dictators that they consider their very own? It’s difficult to get a grasp of your position when all you do is joke and spew irrelevant nonsense. If you don’t agree with what I’ve said, explain
why.
Quote:How to explain your hatred for Israel so that you will go so far as to suggest the theocracy's opposition are CIA or Mossad puppets?
Your completely irrelevant assumptions about my emotions aside, are you saying that the CIA and Mossad
don’t support the Iranian opposition? See my response above to your foolishness.
Quote:Quote:Imperialistic? Of course. It was done to further the US' sphere of influence. Do you think it was done for the benefit of the Libyan people? War Criminals? That seems to be defined by a matter of international consensus. What's the consensus on this?
Of course. Why did I think you might be other than a cartoon?
How is that cartoonish?
Quote:Thanks. With this thread you have revealed your essence. I won't ignore you but I won't be wasting my time engaging you.
Ok.
Quote:Out of curiousity, how did you come up with these opinions?
Parents? Friends? Weird pamphlets read in the dark corners of your bedroom?
Did a Jew steal the girl you longed for from afar?
Are you Jewish?
Are you convinced that agreeing with folks like izzy makes you cool?
I’ve read the histories of the US and Israel. You might want to try it. Careful though, you seem to be the kind of person who’s head would hurt in this endeavor. It’s probably best that you stick to watching FoxNews.