5
   

The planet is about 2.4 times the radius of Earth?

 
 
Reply Tue 6 Dec, 2011 09:33 pm

So the planet is about (2.4x2.4x2.4) times the volume of Earth?

Because the ball volume formula is:

http://dl.zhishi.sina.com.cn/upload/11/96/21/1085119621.2268460.JPG

In it, R is Radius of the ball.


Context:

The newly confirmed planet, Kepler-22b, is the smallest yet found to orbit in the middle of the habitable zone of a star similar to our sun. The planet is about 2.4 times the radius of Earth. Scientists don't yet know if Kepler-22b has a predominantly rocky, gaseous or liquid composition, but its discovery is a step closer to finding Earth-like planets.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/kepscicon-briefing.html[img][/img]
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 5 • Views: 920 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Dec, 2011 10:38 pm
@oristarA,
Do you have a question about this, Ori?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Dec, 2011 10:49 pm
@oristarA,
That's a fallacy of composition, not all balls are created equal. It is not known if this planet is a "rocky" planet, or a very small "gas giant." So little is known about the planet, other than its proximity to its local star and is apparent size that it would be very hasty to make any statements about it other than the few bald statements already offered by the NASA team in charge of Kepler. It it's gaseous, where does that actual planet end and the atmosphere start?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Dec, 2011 11:05 pm
I believe scientists are looking for habitable planets in the wrong places i.e. they're looking for planets like ours, in orbit around stars like ours, at something like our distance.

Far more common in our galaxy are planets in very close orbit around red dwarf stars; that I believe would be the most likely place to find living worlds like ours.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 01:36 am
Well, your arguments are reasonable, guys. A cool head to observe any discoveries is vital, no doubt about that.

But my question remains unanswered - the exact meaning of "2.4 times the radius of Earth."
fobvius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 05:28 am
@oristarA,
Which of the terms 2.4, times, radius and earth are alien to you?
engineer
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 06:07 am
@oristarA,
You are correct in your original read. The radius of the planet is estimated at 2.4x that of Earth and the volume would be 2.4^3 higher. The mass depends on the material it is composed of but you are correct on the volume.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 06:40 am
@fobvius,
fobvius wrote:

Which of the terms 2.4, times, radius and earth are alien to you?


None. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 06:40 am
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

You are correct in your original read. The radius of the planet is estimated at 2.4x that of Earth and the volume would be 2.4^3 higher. The mass depends on the material it is composed of but you are correct on the volume.


Thanks a lot.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 06:49 am

Did you know how to calculate the volume of a pie?

Let the height be a, and the radius z

then it's

pizza
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 06:57 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Did you know how to calculate the volume of a pie?

Let the height be a, and the radius z

then it's

pizza


Sweet.

But equation would be sweeter; see what Albert had said. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 12:50 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
So the planet is about (2.4x2.4x2.4) times the volume of Earth?

I wonder how NASA would know that in the first place. (Your link doesn't work for me.) Normally, planets are detected by observing wobbles in their suns' positions, which in turn are detected through Doppler shifts in their spectral lines. This evidence contains no information about a planet' radius and density.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Dec, 2011 11:12 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

oristarA wrote:
So the planet is about (2.4x2.4x2.4) times the volume of Earth?

I wonder how NASA would know that in the first place. (Your link doesn't work for me.) Normally, planets are detected by observing wobbles in their suns' positions, which in turn are detected through Doppler shifts in their spectral lines. This evidence contains no information about a planet' radius and density.


http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/kepscicon-briefing.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The planet is about 2.4 times the radius of Earth?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 12:28:31