Your pathetic attempts to be clever don't alter that you peddle bullshit, and that the History channel is a bullshit source. Yeah, go ahead, tell me what grammatical faults you allege to be in: "The History channel bears exactly the relationship to history that Christian Science does to actual science. They have whored themselves for the advertisers' dollars, with bullshit shows about Mayan predictions, Nostradamus, Dan Brown's bullshit--all they care about is the bottom line." The sentence structure is fine, and it's no problem of mine if you can't understand sentences containing more than a half a dozen words. The word you wanted was cronies--i don't believe cronny is a word in English.
What evidence do you have that Charles IX wanted to behead Michel de Nostradame? I didn't say that Europe had no place for its "mentally ill"--i said they had no institutions for the mentally ill. That they dealt with, probably ineffectively and with cruelty and neglect, is not evidence that they had "mental institutions."
What is a a croony? (I'm assuming that croony is the singular of croonies.) You just ran in here, and shat out a vague statement about prophets and how they have been treated historically, apparently thinking that you could say whatever you wanted and nobody would call you on it. You apparently thought you could make the **** up as you go along and nobody would call you on it. Actually, it appears to me that you wanted to sound cool and wise and little suspected that online, people will call bullshit in a heartbeat--unless, of course, you run off to some site peopled by high school kids who don't pay attention in class and who are sufficiently gullible to believe your bullshit.