I do hope you're in therapy, Voice. If you actually believe the crap you just posted, you're in worse shape than I had realized. The Torah (Old Testament) was written in Heaven ??? Where the hell's that? Beyond the furthest galaxy we're aware of? You're hopeless, son. My sincere sympathies go out to you.
Quote:stop it's motion by observing it and it appears as a particle.
Quote:It is stopped at the instant it is observed, then it moves on. In the short distance of the double slit experiment, From the point of observation, to the slits, it expands very little and appears as particle.Outside of this crap, youve made MY point. Its experimentally shown about lights properties (no it doesnt stop and still remain visible, it moves on and disperses)
Quote:Particle, then expands to wave.Do you know in what form light is propagated? One or the other or both (particle or wave)?
voiceindarkness wrote:The old testament was written in Hebrew, The new testament in Greek. Copies of books in the old testament where found with the dead sea scrolls.
The Old Testament may have been written in Hebrew originally but the only Hebrew language copies we have today are all re-translations from the Greek. The originals were destroyed when the Second Temple in Jerusalem was razed in the uprising against Rome in 70 c.e. There were Greek translations available, however, and they were quickly re-translated into Hebrew for use in the Synagogues.
Quote:so-called?Precious little of the Torah was found at the Tel Qumran dig where the so-called Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered.Quote:You should research the Dead Sea Scrolls a bit further.The Essene sect which ran the facility was very Messiah-oriented and hence has excited the imagination of Christian scholars. But most historians who have seen and studied the scrolls don't find anything significant in them that they did not already know.
The reference to the Teacher of Righteousness and the war between the Children of Light and the Children of Darkness is a mystery. Scholars look to history to find who or what this is in reference to.
This is a prophetic reference to a teacher, and a war yet to come.
It is stopped at the instant it is observed, then it moves on.
Im curious, were you talking Big Band to Dawkins when he left you?
well I suppose I deserved that for my careless attention to spelling. However,Quote:Dawkins didn't terminate the conversation. As always, I couldn't keep him and one other person focused on my topic. All they wanted to focus on, was my belief in God.I still am curious about at what point (and what subject was being discussed) when DAwkins decided to terminate your conversation??
I had to reply to there remarks. The moderator shut down my thread, saying that it was a science forum, not a religious form.
Quote:I am repelled everywhere I go. Light and darkness don't mix.If one does not want to open one's eyes, he cant hear what I'm seeing.Were you as compelling as youve been here?
The moderator shut down my thread
Quote:I see, so it wasnt DAwkins who terminated anything, it was the mod. Probably the science line had specific rules of "engagement" inorder to keep it intereting, relevant, and factual. Just as teaching Creationism and ID have no places in public science curriculum in the US, so do local rules of Chat Rooms .The moderator shut down my thread
Quote:I never claimed a victory. I said I had no problem debating him.The way the mod enforced the rules shouldnt be a cause for your claiming some ersatz victory .Quote:Did you read my response? (As always, I couldn't keep him and one other person focused on my topic. All they wanted to focus on, was my belief in God.It is , in fact, the equivalent of a moderator of a talk station cutting someone off who starts babbling nonsense.
I had to reply to there remarks. The moderator shut down my thread, saying that it was a science forum, not a religious form).
Quote:Science says,or at least those who are studying it, There is an edge to the universe. They are not looking to the edge of anything, they are looking to the past, to the beginning of creation. In the beginning all of the energy in the universe was was a single point even smaller than an Atom? Then for some reason there was a big bang, and the universe expanded to infinite size as it created itself. This is science?Of course I dont call your talk points nonsense, they just arent science.
The beginning universe was very hot? That,s where my theory begins, at quark confinement, when the energy that makes up matter began.
So far, all I have gotten is smart ass remarks about my theory not being science. Because in my theory the entire infinite universe came into being everywhere simultaneously, and begins with God.
Quote:At least Richard Dawkins did debate the points of my theory. Be specific, what points of my theory isn't supported by evidence? All I see in the world of science is unanswered questions, and made up stupid ideas trying to answer them. They have there heads stuck up their asses looking at a big bang theory that is scientifically imposable for so many reasons.Also, your ideas need some evidence to support.
This is science?
a big bang theory that is scientifically imposable for so many reasons.
So far the evidence for such an event as the BB has not been overturned. Originally, I was not a fan of the BB but, as the evidence streams had become more refined, I feel that the wvidence for the event as I originally defined within this thread, is compelling.
Having been a fan of multi dimensional analyses , I subscribe to many of the postulates for a multiverse and M theory (of course M theory is no more a theory than is that of the thread host's worldview).
Both theism and atheism involve acts of faith.