2
   

an idea = that acute psychological intervention would prevent future post-traumatic symptoms?

 
 
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 05:24 am

Context:
Not all of those working in Japan at the time felt that counselling should be avoided. Kim points to a letter written by a witness to the emergency response that appeared in The Lancet just two weeks after the quake and tsunami. "[The letter] emphasised that acute psychological intervention would prevent future post-traumatic symptoms, an idea no longer supported by any contemporary guidelines," he says.

More:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21108-to-avoid-ptsd-no-debrief-for-japans-quake-survivors.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 1,038 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
maxdancona
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 05:29 am
@oristarA,
Yes, the idea is that acute psychological intervention will prevent symptoms.

Evidently the "contemporary guidelines" no longer support this idea.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 06:20 am
Can you define "psychological intervention" for me?

There's plenty of cases of PTSD out there.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 06:27 am
@Builder,
They mean debriefing. Have a look at the article Oristar refers to.
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 06:31 am
@dlowan,
I'll look later.

Can't think how effective it might be. PTSD can last for a lifetime.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 06:45 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

I'll look later.

Can't think how effective it might be. PTSD can last for a lifetime.



Not so bad.
Only for 5 to 10 percent survivors: " an international review found that just 5 to 10 per cent of those who experience natural disasters develop PTSD."
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 07:07 am
@Builder,
The point of the article is to discuss research suggesting debriefing as an intervention is NOT effective and can actually have a negative effect. There is a lot of research suggesting this and the article discusses alternatives.

Debriefing was supposed to reduce the numbers of people going on to develop PTSD. It isn't a treatment for it.

There are a number of treatments that are reasonably effective if one is one of the unfortunate minority who go on to develop PTSD after trauma....but there is no universally effective treatment.
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 07:51 am
@oristarA,
Natural disasters aside, I'm talking about rape victims, shell-shocked veterans, civilian "collateral damage" victims, and child molestation victims.

You got any stats for me on those demographics?
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 07:57 am
@dlowan,
I'm currently researching the available resources for PTSD cases of adult survivors of childhood rape and sexual assault.

It's quite alarming and depressing to realise the plight of this huge group of people, Dlowan.

One in four adults, totally forgotten and overlooked by both the medical and psyche professions.

That figure does not include those who have never "come out" about what happened to them.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2011 09:20 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

Natural disasters aside, I'm talking about rape victims, shell-shocked veterans, civilian "collateral damage" victims, and child molestation victims.

You got any stats for me on those demographics?


Good point.

Google Scholar search offers no result for the time being.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » an idea = that acute psychological intervention would prevent future post-traumatic symptoms?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/11/2025 at 01:32:49