Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Nov, 2011 07:44 am
@RABEL222,
I'm an Australian, Rabel222.

Any American citizen could be sent down the road to oblivian under those pretenses. Does that not make you feel uneasy?

RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Nov, 2011 03:02 pm
@Builder,
Just what pretenses are you talking about. Our constitution is a living growing thing and amending it is written into it. It has been amended many times because the Supreme court and the legislature has needed to be corrected by the people. Just as is happening now in the U.S..
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Nov, 2011 07:49 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

Just what pretenses are you talking about. Our constitution is a living growing thing and amending it is written into it. It has been amended many times because the Supreme court and the legislature has needed to be corrected by the people. Just as is happening now in the U.S..
It is incapable of anything but superficial change, and always open to the interpretation of a select group of justices, unelected by the people with a vested interest in the status quo... I would be happy to see them all stand back and allow the constitution, and their defense of it, to go on and destroy the government, but when forms self destruct they bring down their whole societies... We have to kill it before it kills us, and it is not going to be easy or fun, but starting over will be a damned sight easier than fixing the old mess...
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Nov, 2011 02:53 pm
@Fido,
Fido. The fact you can express your opinions so eloquently dosent hide the fact you are dumb as a rock.
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Nov, 2011 07:22 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

Fido. The fact you can express your opinions so eloquently dosent hide the fact you are dumb as a rock.
Spank you very much!!!
0 Replies
 
thorax232
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Oct, 2012 04:04 pm
@mysteryman,
I'm with Alexander Hamilton who said:
Quote:
[The] bills of rights… are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”


You can not give someone what they already have, that makes people think their rights come from the government and they have to ask permission to carry a gun or drive a car. Smile So I'd leave out the bill of rights and make it more clear the government has no powers beyond what is specifically mentioned in the constitution.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.32 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 06:01:16