Which Assassination do you feel most tragic about??

@dlowan,

dlowan wrote:

Nah...I'm not angry....I just feel sad for you.

U know, turning aside from all ad hominem acrimony,
in the communist war to enslave the Earth and American defense thereof:
the same as in the anti-nazi war, it is imperative to fight it in EARNEST, not half heartedly.

General Pinochet knew that and he practiced it.
For that, he has my gratitude and my admiration.

THAT ardent, fervent devotion of spirit and purpose to waging that anti-communist war,
is the subject matter of the dispute between Andy and myself
and that is the reason for my passion (which elicited your canine diagnosis).

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Pinochet was a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for the benefit of a small ruling elite. That's what dictators do, whether they style themselves left or right wing. The real battle is between those who believe in the human rights of the masses, and those who believe they should be confined to a small elite.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

shut up izzy
you annoying bitch

1 Reply

@samyboy27,

Wow, straight out of George Bernard Shaw. You only find it annoying because you're as thick as ****.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

Don't mind him. He's just a 15-year-old "rapper," a naughty child who deserves a paddling administered by either his principal or a coach. Twisted Evil

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Izzy, when u leave filthy language like that lying around, rife with excrementitious reference,
the innocent among us stumble upon it, those who did not offend u.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Pinochet was a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for the benefit of a small ruling elite.

No, Izzy; u r naive.
I have known some Hispanic conservatives; thay can be very,
very practical and have common sense, not liberalism.
General Pinochet knew that his countrymen coud oppress the commies,
or fall victim to them, becoming oppressed BY the commies,
because of foolish sentimentality inhibiting successful prosecution of the war.
He was too smart to fall for that.
He knew that "in war, there is no substitute for victory." (MacArthur)

izzythepush wrote:

That's what dictators do, whether they style themselves left or right wing.

Dictators can be oppressive, definitionally. Is that a tautology?
We needed to be concerned about success of the anti-communist war effort.

izzythepush wrote:

The real battle is between those who believe in the human rights of the masses,
and those who believe they should be confined to a small elite.

No, Izzy; truely, the real battles were in killing the nazis and the commies, in their respective wars.
We coud not afford to fool around. Survival of freedom in the world was at stake.
If we had indeed fallen into the hell of commie despotism,
the chances of EVER getting free woud be little, with advances
in surveillance technology being what thay have become.
The 1,OOO year reich woud have been established,
only being commie instead of nazi; not much difference.
Thay were both collectivist-authoritarians. Death is better than that.

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Gosh, David, you have totally outdone your own self here. If you tried harder you could win. You're not trying hard enough. Go on, don't be afraid, give it your all.

1 Reply

@Pemerson,

OK, Pem; thank u.
U have re-inspired me
( but the commies remain defunct ).

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Pinochet was not the Irish Bowling Champion, but a brutal man who threw his opponants out of an aeroplane. Allende was democratically elected.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Pinochet was not the Irish Bowling Champion,
but a brutal man who threw his opponants out of an aeroplane.

He was to be COMMENDED for his wise choice of opponents.

izzythepush wrote:

Allende was democratically elected.

He was a communist.
That is like a cancer cell.

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

victory at any cost, eh dave?

God is on our side and all that...

1 Reply

@Rockhead,

Rockhead wrote:

victory at any cost, eh dave?

God is on our side and all that...

YES
That is the way to DO it.

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

izzythepush wrote:
Allende was democratically elected.

He was a communist.
That is like a cancer cell.

The cancer cell is the murderous tyrant stamping on human rights, they, and those that give them succour need to be scourged. We need to fill up the Haig with the lot of them.

0 Replies

Would some one please remind OmSickDAVID of the following facts? (I refuse to ever again address the idiot directly.)

In 1950, N. Korea invaded S. Korea and we, along with the rest of the world, got embroiled in a shooting war which, in the end, no one won (technically, a state of war still exists between North and South.)

In the 1950s lynchings of blacks in the American South were still fairly commonplace. The KKK was a more-or-less social organization in many communities and African-Americans in the states below the Mason-Dixon line had virtually no rights whatever, regardless of the 13th and 14th Amendments to the US Constitution.

A number of other nations, besides, the USA, now had a neuclear weapons capacity, chiefly the USSR. I was in school in Boston in 1950 and we had weekly bomb drills of what to do immediately if you saw a flash of light brighter than the sun. (It was the pinnacle of paranoid absurdity, leading to further paranoia for an entire generation of Americans. What you do, if you see such a light, should be you stand up and look at that marvelous sight; it's one of the last things you'll ever see anyway; enjoy it.)

In the 1950s most of the people I knew were still recovering from the impact of WW II, many of them living lives of quiet (or,perhaps, noisy) desperation.

And this is the world the cretin known as DAVID longs for? He's even sicker than you surmised, dlowan.

1 Reply

@Lustig Andrei,

Lustig Andrei wrote:

Would some one please remind OmSickDAVID of the following facts?
(I refuse to ever again address the idiot directly.)

What naked, BLATANT HYPOCRISY! The hypocrit puts it RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME,
where I can 't miss it, and then he says that he refuses to address me directly.

Lustig Andrei wrote:

In 1950, N. Korea invaded S. Korea and we, along with the rest of the world, got embroiled in a shooting war which, in the end, no one won (technically, a state of war still exists between North and South.)

I think everybody is perfectly aware of that, Andy. What is your point?

Lustig Andrei wrote:

In the 1950s lynchings of blacks in the American South were still fairly commonplace. The KKK was a more-or-less social organization in many communities and African-Americans in the states below the Mason-Dixon line had virtually no rights whatever,

WHAT is your point??

Lustig Andrei wrote:

regardless of the 13th and 14th Amendments to the US Constitution.

"REGARDLESS", u say??
Are u crazy or stupid??
Your post suggests that the 13th Amendment had no effect.
Whether the blacks were held in slavery or not, IS significant to them.
Trivializing the 13th Amendment makes little sense.

Lustig Andrei wrote:

A number of other nations, besides, the USA, now had a neuclear weapons capacity, chiefly the USSR.

Yes; because of communist spies. Did u support the Rosenbergs, Andy?

Lustig Andrei wrote:

I was in school in Boston in 1950 and we had weekly bomb drills of what to do immediately if you saw a flash of light brighter than the sun. (It was the pinnacle of paranoid absurdity, leading to further paranoia for an entire generation of Americans. What you do, if you see such a light, should be you stand up and look at that marvelous sight; it's one of the last things you'll ever see anyway; enjoy it.)

What a consumately STUPID thing to say!!
Whether such a bomb has any effect upon u at all, however slight,
depends on the size of the bomb and your DISTANCE from its detonation.
Configuration of the terrain might have some effects on the destruction of the bomb.

If u were in a school (typically, with large windows), standing up and looking out
will be wonderful for getting a faceful of flying glass; facial shredding.
That 's Andy 's philosophy of nuclear warfare.

Lustig Andrei wrote:

In the 1950s most of the people I knew were still recovering from the impact of WW II, many of them living lives of quiet (or,perhaps, noisy) desperation.

In 1950, everyone whom I knew,
or observed, was fairly content.
I saw no "desperation" in NY, nor in Arizona.

Lustig Andrei wrote:

And this is the world the cretin known as DAVID longs for?
He's even sicker than you surmised, dlowan.

U find it necessary to distort & twist what I said
and then to put false words into my mouth.

I spoke of going back to visit; whether to remain there,
or for how long, is another matter that I have not considered.
I am not even packed yet.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

"What a consumately STUPID thing to say!"

dave, I warned you about playing with stones around your transparent enclave...

are you a glazier?

1 Reply

@Rockhead,

Rockhead wrote:

"What a consumately STUPID thing to say!"

dave, I warned you about playing with stones around your transparent enclave...

are you a glazier?

Rocky, if u believe that anything that I have said is stupid,
then please tell me what it is.
In theory, u coud be right.
As a matter of probabililty: I doubt it,
but I keep an open mind.

WHAT do u believe that I said is stupid??????????
We can consider it, with fair and open minds.

David

0 Replies

Which Assassination do you feel most tragic about??

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know