@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
Quote:This particular law may not be intended to outlaw breeding of any kind, but it's pretty clear to me that there are a fair number of people who believe that would be a good result, and will work towards it.
I live in Olympia Washington and I have heard several local "Greeners" (basically organic brown rice and granola liberals) say that pure bred dogs should be illegal, as breeding them is an abuse of animals. All dogs should be mutts according to them.
I'm well aware that they exist hawk and while I'm sure that everyone who is infuriated by Puppy Mills doesn't necessarily share their extreme opinions, these bills need to be examined to ensure they are not advancing such an agenda.
Anytime I hear someone argue that the problem is too important to spend a lot of time figuring out the best answer, or the problem isn't people, it's (
fill in the blank), or that if you don't agree with the solution you either don't understand or don't care enough about the problem, my antenna go up.
The folks who would like to see all private breeding outlawed are certainly free to to pursue a goal of rendering that desire into law. They are also free to demonize their opponents, twist the facts, and get the legislative skids as greasy as possible to slide their bill on through. Their opponents are free to try and stop them. I just have to wonder how much coverage these bills get and how hard one has to pay attention to catch wind of them, before its too late.
And of course the approach of solving problems by restricting freedom and substituting governmental madates for personal responsibility and choice is hardly limited to matters involving puppies and kittens.