Question to those who do or do not doubt Christianity

Your accusations are wrong, as is most of what you say on here. You make stuff up as you go along. You’re as dense as London Fog.

You mis-interperated that. This has nothing to do with any debate with Set.

Just another reason why you are a moron. You do realize that your brain has to have certain receptors to be able to intake certain chemicals. For example when people smoke pot, the thc molecules can attach themselves to the receptors in the brain which causes a chemical result in the brain. Now if you smoke maple leaves or cat nip, nothing happens because there are no brain receptors capible of doing anything with the chemicals you just absorbed.

Let me spell this out for you because you are so dense you never connect anything. If a god created you, then he created you with the ability to get high. Without these special receptors in the brain, smoking pot wouldn't do anything to you. They are required. So if drugs are from hell, then this god purposely created you with the ability to absorb these chemicals and that they would result in something. Just another aspect of how your reasoning is retarded but if you aren't retarded, then your god is for creating this absurd circular reasoning.

"I'm going to give you a choice but if you chose B then I am going to torture you for ever for it, but hey you get a free choice."

Retarded.

Being assertive is a form of behavior characterized by a confident declaration or affirmation of a statement without need of proof; this affirms the person's rights or point of view without either aggressively threatening the rights of another (assuming a position of dominance) or submissively permitting another to ignore or deny one's rights or point of view.[1]

How could you genuinely think this, if you have not read the Bible, and do not step foot in a church?

Because, whether someone has the right to get upset or not...We all do it...It is just right, that I happen to accept this...And apologize when I do it...Others seem to overlook this...Or not feel the need...That is why I do not get mad at them, that they do not understand it...

I hear it all, and respond to them...

Who honestly, is listening to me, Or responding, to me?? Based upon what I say, and, not what they feel? Just like I am doing to them...

RL is correct, I have been your friend all the way through and that won't stop, but I don't think I need to post anymore when I feel that you are down, you seem to get back up again...

Regardless of what people think of anyone what is important is good and clear communication, read that quote again..

Firstly. We all have our own beliefs right? And, it's based on those beliefs that you come to a conclusion. Naturally, like everyone else, we were read the Bible or parts of it at one stage, or saw a movie over a Christmas period. Like everyone else, I have in-deed entered a Church. I find the buildings beautiful, I loathe the modern day brick Churches. I have only once that I recall attended an Easter Mass, by request of my Brother-In-Law, and I have obviously attended my niece and nephews Christenings, that is not what I am saying. I am saying I refuse to "go to Church" I would not believe a word that was spoken and I feel it's full of greed and adultry for the main part. Off course there has to be some Priests that are genuine and some Churches that are not there to make money, one would hope.

So, I genuinely think this as this is my belief.. The Bible is man made and the Church is man made ....Now. If you believe you speak to God, ask him as he would agree with me. It's been pulled apart, changed, and the Churches are run much like Polititions for power.. Not all, mostly.

You already answered that question that you read the Bible to find things in there that you can say "aha, I knew it" .. As for Church I hope that you don't contribute with dollars and I hope that you don't believe every word, brainwashing can occur too ... Doesn't mean as you know that I don't believe that there is not a God. I do believe there is one.

Far better a man whom does not allow words to bother him, rather ignore it as childish or wrong, or that's their perspective or thoughts not yours. I sure will use the F word if I am quoting someone back but frankly, ranting it over and over how can that do you good? You are correct though that you have the right to be yourself.

I wonder if a person has to agree first in order to respond to you in agreement

. . . I don't care if I can't FUCKEN spell or be great in grammer . . .

Please reply again with spelling correctly.

Nope.

See if you believe in God and that you can communicate with him, he will guide you so you don't really need to read it unless he is telling you or guiding you to do so, so that you can do his work, under the situation you are projecting.

I heard enough I think as a child here and there to know the basics, and basis of it. Can't understand in any event half of the lingo.. And to be honest, reading some of the things on this thread quoted from the Bible? I couldn't imagine any God would have written some of the things stated.. I think it was either mis-interperated by man or mis-interperated by man:)

Too much evilness is in there, how can a God be good and discuss his own evilness... Rather than evil.

I think that backing someone up, when they are down, Is one of the ways you truly can show how to assert someone, who is not being so...And are there friend as well...

Regardless of what people think of anyone what is important is good and clear communication,

I wonder if a person has to agree first in order to respond to you in agreement

No, they do not have to do that...

As long as a person is consistent...I have no problem with it...

The ONLY thing I agree, could change, and should change, is there is clearly no need to get as angry, as others do with me...

Spades.. I will take that to account.

I wasn't talking about just myself Spades and not us.

I am saying be clear and precise as you sometimes are, when communicating over a subject matter and try to take out feeling upset at what was said. Counter it..

Mis-interpretation is totally different for sure, especially over the Internet, and without Smile's.. One thing said can be taken in several ways as well..

How can a person agree with you if they don't agree with your statement or beliefs? They can't.

(like button) If you get angry back Spades, you are lowering yourself to that persons standards (not putting anyone down here, as something you may have said may have offended them to have written that unless they say what, who knows) but in any event, that's my thoughts. In addition to that. It's a waste of energy and they win... Why give someone that satisfaction?

For me I'm placid. But, rub me totally the wrong way and I can like anyone else retaliate but more alongs the lines of proving them wrong, or just totally ignoring that person .. Who ever is in your life should be worth it on the same side, respect you at least. Or don't let them in.

I was wondering Spades.

Where learning is concerned? And, the boys whereby you think that they have voted you down.. Do you know anything about them?

Have you actually read any of their threads/posts ?

Would it be a wise thing and a good thing to take the time to read up a bit to understand other people, as to why they may view points made here the way they do?

And to know who you are replying to?