mesquite
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 03:57 pm
Hobitbob,
I think that the problem with your analogy is that when one of the christian fundamentalists in the US open their mouth like Falwell and Robertson did after 9/11 (we had it coming) there is an uproar and they get it pushed back.

I do not see the same thing in the islamic world such as when OBL made his fatwa. You do hear the occasional cleric say that islam is peaceful or islam is against suicide but you never hear what I would call strong words such as "with my understanding of islam, such activity will send those people to a hot place, not paradise". The reason we do not hear such words is because it would not be true. I agree with you that the average muslim does not condone AQ activity. I also believe that the average muslim does not get into the heavy theology of the religion. I remember seeing a reporter interviewing some AQ prisoners in northern Afghanistan shortly after 9/11. When asked if they thought it was allowed under islam to kill innocent civilians the answer was " if a cleric said it was ok I would do it".
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 03:59 pm
Adn that response differs from what fundamentalist Christians would say in what way? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 03:59 pm
Steve,
Re your sig line. I did and I will. Laughing
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:02 pm
hobitbob wrote:
Adn that response differs from what fundamentalist Christians would say in what way? Rolling Eyes

Sorry, I do not understand the question. Which response are you refering to?
0 Replies
 
Thunder Cloud
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:04 pm
A lot of simplistic "good guys" vs the "bad guys" crap here regarding the faiths of others. It wasn't too long ago that the faith of the American Indian was not recognized as being a part of Religion and did not fall under any freedom of Religion. Even before that the spiritual Hierarchy of the Apache was all but wiped out...in the name of what good faith was that? Even today, there is a "faith-bias" against them.

Well, let's see what the big superiority trip is about. Some Israelis run from some heavily armored Philistines and are stopped by the Red Sea. So they have the choice of definitely being butchered or possibly drowning. Amazingly they make it to the other side and it seems a miracle that they survived, that the sea seemed to part somehow. This is what is called faith. Faith is about having confidence in survival and eventual Salvation from this world. It is reality...not some Hollywood movie.

So why demand perfection in the faith of others?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 04:14 pm
Thunder Cloud wrote:
A lot of simplistic "good guys" vs the "bad guys" crap here regarding the faiths of others.

For many this seems a comfortable sunbstitute for thought.


Quote:
It wasn't too long ago that the faith of the American Indian was not recognized as being a part of Religion and did not fall under any freedom of Religion. Even before that the spiritual Hierarchy of the Apache was all but wiped out...in the name of what good faith was that? Even today, there is a "faith-bias" against them.

Oh, come on. "Everyone" knows the Indians are the bad guys. After all, look at all those hollywood westerns! Wink

Quote:
Well, let's see what the big superiority trip is about. Some Israelis run from some heavily armored Philistines and are stopped by the Red Sea. So they have the choice of definitely being butchered or possibly drowning. Amazingly they make it to the other side and it seems a miracle that they survived, that the sea seemed to part somehow. This is what is called faith. Faith is about having confidence in survival and eventual Salvation from this world. It is reality...not some Hollywood movie.

So why demand perfection in the faith of others?

Because that demand allows one to attempt to demonstrate some nobility of purpose in one's bigotry.
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Thu 11 Mar, 2004 11:40 pm
Thunder Cloud wrote:
A lot of simplistic "good guys" vs the "bad guys" crap here regarding the faiths of others. It wasn't too long ago that the faith of the American Indian was not recognized as being a part of Religion and did not fall under any freedom of Religion. Even before that the spiritual Hierarchy of the Apache was all but wiped out...in the name of what good faith was that? Even today, there is a "faith-bias" against them.

Well, let's see what the big superiority trip is about. Some Israelis run from some heavily armored Philistines and are stopped by the Red Sea. So they have the choice of definitely being butchered or possibly drowning. Amazingly they make it to the other side and it seems a miracle that they survived, that the sea seemed to part somehow. This is what is called faith. Faith is about having confidence in survival and eventual Salvation from this world. It is reality...not some Hollywood movie.

So why demand perfection in the faith of others?



It is not so much good guys vs bad guys as it is non-rational vs those of us with functioning nervous systems.

Faith is, by definition, a non-rational way of thinking. You are free to be a fideist; nobody is going to stop you. Just as I am free to believe that a magical circus clown named Fred farted the universe into existence. We are both well withen our rights. We are also both stupid, utter wastes of protien.

Please, when you are engaging in conversations here, make sure to preface your statements by acknowledging the non-rational nature of your beliefs. That way people can avoid taking you seriously. There is no point in discussing this further because we have no common ground to stand on. Faith is immune to logic by its very definition. You cannot reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

Faith is pernicious. It was faith, if you recall - a faith no different from yours - that drove 19 men to crach planes into skyscrapers on 9/11.

So I say to you Hail Fred; the mercifull, the munificent. He whose farts do not stink but breath life, He whose anus is the breech of all existence, He whose sheer Fredness is unattainable. Hail Fred.

Or burn in hell forever for refusing to acknowledge His sheer awesomeness.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 12 Mar, 2004 04:53 am
Mesquite,

you make a point I was going to make. Lack of wholesale condemnation from an ISLAMIC authority of al Qaida's actions. There might be explanations for this. Islam does not have a Pope figure (except of course some Christians suspect the Pope might really be Muslim). So there's no recognised head figure to do the condemning. Secondly some Muslims prefer to say nothing either because they quietly approve of bin Ladens gang or they fear retribution from them if they speak out.

What I really find disconcerting is the extent to which OBL is seen as a hero in the Islamic world. I remember having quite a fight with sailfree at the time of 911 because he was saying there were muslims dancing in the street in Britain. I said this was absolutely untrue. But although it was never broadcast on British media, there were pro obl demonstrations in places like Bradford with a large Pakistani community.

Thanks for voting (for) me btw! But your comments on this thread suggest you do not fall into the apathetic potential non voters who I really want to engergise. If not for their own benefit then by appealing to their sense of altruism, and thinking of me! If you know anyone like that... please tell them about this poor Brit who is desperate to get rid of G W Bush, but who can't vote!

Hobit,

Your flippant off the cuff remarks that give every impression of lack of brain mouth co ordination are really irritating.

Yesterday I overlooked this one

Quote:
given that the fundies are the minority (rather like AQ, whom they share many opinions with),


By fundies I assume you mean extreme evangelical Christians. I dont see them sharing any opinions with OBL. I can't see them sat down together over a cup of tea discussing the great questions of the world. The only thing they have in common is their desire to condemn the other to hell.

Mesquite quoted an Islamic fighter who said he would kill civilians if a cleric said it was ok. You say Christian fundamentalist clerics would give similar authority. Really? I detest the likes of Falwell and Robertson every bit as much as you do, the difference is that I don't let my dislike of them cloud my ability to think critically. Christian fundamentalists do not condone murder of innocents. Neither do they authorise it. Anyone who did would be instantly excommunicated from all Christian denominations.

Thundercloud asks why demand perfection in other's religion (which I for one never have, but leaving that) to which you add

Quote:
Because that demand allows one to attempt to demonstrate some nobility of purpose in one's bigotry.


You are fond of calling others bigots. It seems you think any criticism of Islam can be dismissed as merely symptomatic of another's bigotry. Thats as weak an argument as Ariel Sharon dismissing criticism of his government as nothing but anti Semitism.

ILZ Laughing

Very good, for a Rastafarian! No woman, no fart, man.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Fri 12 Mar, 2004 07:26 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Mesquite,
Hobit,

Your flippant off the cuff remarks that give every impression of lack of brain mouth co ordination are really irritating.

Yesterday I overlooked this one

Quote:
given that the fundies are the minority (rather like AQ, whom they share many opinions with),


By fundies I assume you mean extreme evangelical Christians. I dont see them sharing any opinions with OBL. I can't see them sat down together over a cup of tea discussing the great questions of the world. The only thing they have in common is their desire to condemn the other to hell.

The religious fundamentalists in the US have many things in common with the fundamentalist Muslims, including viewing other members of their overall religious group (other Christians) as apostates who deserve death. In addition, they express disdain for secular institutions like schools and government. They tend to teach their young to dislike other social groups actively (women, blacks, Hispanics, Jews, Muslims, any foreigners, gays, "liberals" etc...), to the point of violence. they also believe, and are actively working toward, a form of government where their religious views are the basis for civil rule. In addition, they believe that their "vision" of society should be forcibly imposed on the rest of society. They also believe in using violence (against gays, abortion clinics, etc..) to further their agenda. How different is this from AQ? Your mistake here seems to be believeing that similarity implies cooperation.

Quote:
Mesquite quoted an Islamic fighter who said he would kill civilians if a cleric said it was ok. You say Christian fundamentalist clerics would give similar authority. Really? I detest the likes of Falwell and Robertson every bit as much as you do, the difference is that I don't let my dislike of them cloud my ability to think critically. Christian fundamentalists do not condone murder of innocents. Neither do they authorise it. Anyone who did would be instantly excommunicated from all Christian denominations.

Really? You have certainly not been following this group's thoughts as closely as I have, then.

Quote:
Thundercloud asks why demand perfection in other's religion (which I for one never have, but leaving that) to which you add

Quote:
Because that demand allows one to attempt to demonstrate some nobility of purpose in one's bigotry.


You are fond of calling others bigots. It seems you think any criticism of Islam can be dismissed as merely symptomatic of another's bigotry. Thats as weak an argument as Ariel Sharon dismissing criticism of his government as nothing but anti Semitism.

No, reasoned criticism of any religion or ideology is to be applauded. The blind dislike you show toward an entire groups of people is bigotry.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 12 Mar, 2004 09:05 am
The Hobit accuses me of bigotry

Quote:
The blind dislike you show toward an entire groups of people is bigotry.


I dont know which group of people (I assume you meant singular) you accuse me of showing a "blind dislike" towards. It couldn't have been Muslims, as I said only on the previous page...

Quote:
I feel sorry for ordinary Muslim people. Most of them live under despotic regimes, oppressed by their own western-supported governments, and further kept down in their aspirations by a religion they were born into, with little chance to break free. What Islam needs is a reformation, a wholesale liberalisation and reappraisal of what it means to be Muslim in the 21st century. But of course Muslims who push for reform tend to end up dead by the hands of the fundamentalists. On top of these burdens, ordinary Muslims who reject extremism are made to feel guilt for the murderous activities of a small minority who act (and there is no getting away from this) in the name of Allah.


Now how much empathy do you have for evangelical Christians? Please don't tell me you don't have any, or I will have to accuse you of disliking them, and probably blindly too. :wink:
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Fri 12 Mar, 2004 10:38 am
Steve, you asked hobitbob this question.
Quote:
Now how much empathy do you have for evangelical Christians? Please don't tell me you don't have any, or I will have to accuse you of disliking them, and probably blindly too.

He had already answered it in the previous post with this
Quote:

The religious fundamentalists in the US have many things in common with the fundamentalist Muslims, including viewing other members of their overall religious group (other Christians) as apostates who deserve death. In addition, they express disdain for secular institutions like schools and government. They tend to teach their young to dislike other social groups actively (women, blacks, Hispanics, Jews, Muslims, any foreigners, gays, "liberals" etc...), to the point of violence. they also believe, and are actively working toward, a form of government where their religious views are the basis for civil rule. In addition, they believe that their "vision" of society should be forcibly imposed on the rest of society. They also believe in using violence (against gays, abortion clinics, etc..) to further their agenda. How different is this from AQ? Your mistake here seems to be believeing that similarity implies cooperation.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 12 Mar, 2004 11:00 am
oh yes, I must have overlooked that. Sounds like an example of blind dislike Shocked if you ask me!
0 Replies
 
Thunder Cloud
 
  1  
Fri 12 Mar, 2004 01:04 pm
IronLionZion wrote:
Thunder Cloud wrote:
A lot of simplistic "good guys" vs the "bad guys" crap here regarding the faiths of others. It wasn't too long ago that the faith of the American Indian was not recognized as being a part of Religion and did not fall under any freedom of Religion. Even before that the spiritual Hierarchy of the Apache was all but wiped out...in the name of what good faith was that? Even today, there is a "faith-bias" against them.

Well, let's see what the big superiority trip is about. Some Israelis run from some heavily armored Philistines and are stopped by the Red Sea. So they have the choice of definitely being butchered or possibly drowning. Amazingly they make it to the other side and it seems a miracle that they survived, that the sea seemed to part somehow. This is what is called faith. Faith is about having confidence in survival and eventual Salvation from this world. It is reality...not some Hollywood movie.

So why demand perfection in the faith of others?



It is not so much good guys vs bad guys as it is non-rational vs those of us with functioning nervous systems.

Faith is, by definition, a non-rational way of thinking. You are free to be a fideist; nobody is going to stop you. Just as I am free to believe that a magical circus clown named Fred farted the universe into existence. We are both well withen our rights. We are also both stupid, utter wastes of protien.

Please, when you are engaging in conversations here, make sure to preface your statements by acknowledging the non-rational nature of your beliefs. That way people can avoid taking you seriously. There is no point in discussing this further because we have no common ground to stand on. Faith is immune to logic by its very definition. You cannot reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.



I am not a believer. I either know something is true, or I do not. If I do not, I search for that truth.

It is by having certain knowledge or not having certain knowledge which creates a lack of common ground.

Please, when you are engaging in conversations with me, make sure to preface your statements by acknowledging that you do not know everything.
0 Replies
 
QKid
 
  1  
Wed 31 Mar, 2004 11:34 am
Yes truth is what we all should seek. And hopefully we all will reach it.

Now I have not replied in so long a time because I see that trying to have a discussion with some of u guys is impossible. Also, someone on this thread said that this is my evidence to prove the Quran is the word of God?? No, no, no, I havent even done that. I just wanted to see what you guys know and what were your views.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Wed 31 Mar, 2004 03:10 pm
OK Qkid, this is my take, apologies if I'm repeating myself here,

1.Judaism is exclusive to the point of being racist. Any group of people who regard themselves God's children must look down on other mere mortals. Its unhealthy.

2.Islam was progressive in its day, but its day was 1300 years ago. It hasnt developed. It has held people back. It is now repressive and has an alarming tendency to encourage violence in the name of God. Muslim against Christian. Muslim against Jew. Muslim against Hindu. Muslim against other Muslims...notice any pattern? Any commonality?

3. Christianity is a joke. Founded on pure myth and fairy tale. A mish mash of Jewish christ-messianic liberation cult and Greek mystery religion. Not taken seriously by any thinking person... except that loving one another instead of slaughtering one's supposed enemies is better than 1 and 2 above. Its a nonsense but relatively harmless.


No question about it really, if you are stupid to fall for any of this stuff, go for myth and nonsense over racism and violence.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Wed 31 Mar, 2004 04:23 pm
Steve, I could agree with that summation if it were not for Christianity being piggy-backed onto Judaism. As it is, Christianity is carrying along a lot of baggage.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Thu 1 Apr, 2004 07:50 am
Well of course you're right Mesquite (nice avatar btw). When I said Christianity, I had in mind the established church of England, and similar bodies. They tend to be liberal, inclusive and desperate for interfaith dialogue.

They are so keen not to offend other "communities of faith" that they are reluctant to spell out what they really believe in themselves. I find all that self doubt and criticism in the C of E quite refreshing.
0 Replies
 
QKid
 
  1  
Wed 14 Apr, 2004 11:01 am
Ok guys,

I have not even put my proof for the fact that the Quran is the Word of God (entirely).

First of all I want to begin by saying that we Muslims believe in the Bible and Torah. But its not the same ones that we have today. Our view on the Bible is what Jesus pbuh preached, but we dont have that today and our view of the Torah is what Moses pbuh preached. But we dont have these exact books today anyway. We also believe that the previous 2 revelations (Bible and Torah) are corrupted, that they were changed by man. This is why the Quran had to be revealed. It is the final revelation and it will not be changed or corrupted by man.

Now getting to the proof:
But to do this I have to ask you guys a series of questions, BUT i only want replies from mesquite and steve because otherwise we cannot have proper discussion and we will move away from the topic as always. I ask everyone else to be patient. Please I just want steve and mesquite to answer the questions I will be asking.

Qestion 1:
Lets say that you agreed that Muhammed pbuh is a prophet. That he is receiving revelation from God, that you agreed to this, just presume that you did. Now this is a very huge claim for anyone to make. To be able to say that you can communicate with the Creator of the universe. If someone were to claim that they were a prophet, how would you react? (Remember you do believe that there is a God also) You see, prophet Muhammed pbuh is claiming that he is a prophet. So my question is, How can you verify if one who is claiming to be a prophet is really a prophet? What is the criteria for a prophet?

Please just answer the question. Dont go off topic. Just answer the question directly. If we can do it in this manner, maybe we can come to a conclusion. So Steve and Mesquite are the only ones i should be hearing from.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Wed 14 Apr, 2004 12:20 pm
Steve, Mrs Doyle has a message for you ! ("Go on")

http://www.bbcamerica.com/genre/comedy_games/father_ted/sound_bites.jsp
0 Replies
 
QKid
 
  1  
Mon 19 Apr, 2004 03:44 pm
Where is Mesquite and Steve?? I am waiting for your replies..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Islam miracles.
  3. » Page 10
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 02:15:49