I don't hate the Democrats.
There are a few which I come close on, but if I hate someone, I wish for harm to come to them. There have been very few people during my life that I truly hated, and it was never because they were Democrats.
There are a number of Democrat politicians (including our President) who I deeply dislike and for who I have very minimal respect, but that's not hatred.
I would never wish for any harm to come to President Obama. I wish he didn't win the 2008 election, and I very much hope he will not be re-elected, but why would I wish him harm? Well, I have to admit I would love to see him slip on a banana peel or get hit in the chops by a kid swinging a whiffle ball bat, but not if he was really injured by either event.
I would never lament the absence of a practiced assassin now that Obama is president. I would never suggest it might be a good thing for Nancy Pelosi to get punished by rape. These are things Liberals feel about Republicans, (not me) and if there is a Conservative out there that does, I want no part of them.
The mega-rich like Warren Buffet, Bill Gates and George Soros, almost never suffer during economic down turns. This doesn't mean they don't lose lots of money,but they have so much in the first place that any loss can hardly be considered suffering.
I'm pretty sure the same can be said of any billionaire, but how many do you think there are?
You could take every penny of what they own in taxes and it won't solve our economic woes. You do realize this don't you?
So let's move to the millionaires: There is a huge difference between a millionaire who is worth $200 mil and one who is worth $2mil, and yet Democrats lump them all together as people with "too much money."
But even if you take every cent of their money, our economic woes will not be cured.
Even the Dems aren't suggesting we should tax 100% of the personal wealth of millionaires and billionaires, so if 100% won't even do it, where do you get the rest?
Well it must be those " hundred-thousandaires" who make too much and have to give more to be "fair."
I have news for you, in bad economic times there are plenty of "hundred-thousandaires" who suffer. They lose their jobs, their houses, their retirement funds, but I guess that doesn't matter because for at least a little while they got to live high on the hog. Never mind that it took them 25 to 35 years of damned hard work to eventually get on top of the hog, and that for a good part of their lives the difference in their status wasn't that they had more than their neighbors, but that they whined far less about how the mega-rich needed to be milked to pay for their wants and desires.
So, by Democrat definition, a couple making $250,000 a year is "rich" and needs to pay more taxes to be "fair"
And does anyone really believe that when the Democrats get more from these people they will stop spending, that there will no longer be wrongs to right through government expansion and spending?
Do you really believe that to be the case?
Of course it isn't. Democratpoliticians spend to buy power, and people who need power can never have enough.
Eventually they will come knocking on your door, unless you are already an American who depends upon the government for a living; without contribution.
Unfortunately as history as clearly told us, by the time everyone depends upon a government for a living, the country's economy is terminal and the gravy train must end...plus it never really is a gravy train...ask the Russians and the Chinese.