Noah The African wrote:In essence, what I propose, would, in effect produce what you want to produce by focusing simply on poverty. No matter how you focus, by class or by race, blacks come out as the primary beneficiaries, due to blacks being disproportionately poor.
Correct, but the criteria should not be racial, the criteria should be about helping the disadvantaged.
Quote:Thus, I am all for focusing on class too.
I think this is a paramount distinction. See there's really no valid reason for a disadvantaged white person to be paying extra taxes simply because they are white.
There is no valid reason for a rich black person to be benefiting from those taxes simply because they are black.
Quote: The only thing that I would add, however, is that black people should be able to use the pool of taxes dollars that they would get for the black poor, in the way that we chose to use them and not have a cookie cutter approach of solving poverty that is caused by differing phenomenon.
This is absurd. The benefits should directly correspond with the need (accourding to societal situation).
To simply give a handout based on race and let a racial group determine what is done with national taxes is ludicrous.
Quote:White leaders can then decide how to use the tax money going to eliminate white poverty, since they BEST understand the issues and problems of whites, while black leaders would be allowed to decide how to use the black dollars, because blacks BEST understand black problems and needs.
Again this tribal nonsense is absurd.
You might like to be led around but I don't. I don't want to have to depend on some "white leader" and I bet many blacks wouldn't want to have some "black leader" determine their finances either.
The benefits should be directly given to the individual just like the taxes are collected.
Having "white leaders" and "black leaders" take charge of everyone's money is as absurd as saying that "white leaders" and "black leaders" should be in charge of determining and collecting taxes.
The tribalism inherent in that proposition is risible.
But let's focus on where we agree.
The disadvantaged can be helped through societal collaboration.
Those getting help would not be defined by race but by need.