Baldimo
 
  -1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 03:16 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
At least it wasn't a "Vote with your uterus" commercial. That's all the Dems have to play here in CO. They can't win on the issues, so it's one big pro-abortion commercial after another.

I don't understand why you guys on the left want women to be single issues voters.
RexRed
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 03:31 pm
Who knew? Looks like proudly defending outsourcing is not a political winner
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/14/1336540/-Who-knew-Looks-like-proudly-defending-outsourcing-is-not-a-political-winner?detail=facebook
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 03:36 pm
@Baldimo,
He's talking about the 10 or so Senate races that are in serious contention. He's not talking about the total money spent on this election.

Newsbusters is a RW site and they make no bones about it.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 03:40 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
I don't understand why you guys on the left want women to be single issues voters.

Distraction and promises of more free stuff works very well on women, too.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 03:59 pm
@coldjoint,
What "free stuff" are you talking about?

BTW, did you attend public school? Do you use the roads, sidewalks, and freways?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 04:01 pm
Quote:
What the "Official" Jobs Numbers Aren't Telling You


Quote:

Early this month, the Pew Research Center released its News IQ Quiz, in order to survey the general public’s level of knowledge about current events. This provided no end of fun for commentators, gleefully mocking the average American’s ignorance, as if knowing the minimum wage or the Chair of the Federal Reserve has any relevance to most people’s lives, when many are still struggling to find jobs and feed their families.

It’s true that many people have a lot to learn about what’s going on in the world these days, but of particular interest was one survey question regarding the unemployment rate. When asked about the national unemployment rate as reported by the government, only a third of people said it was close to 6 percent, 27 percent said close to 9 percent, and 18 percent said close to 12 percent.

From a technical standpoint (owing to the carefully chosen words “as reported by the government” two thirds of respondents got the question wrong. But the truth is, if you actually consider what unemployment really means, in contrast to the government’s official reports, those opting for a higher number actually have a much better grasp of reality than those giving the “correct answer.”

The official unemployment rate as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics just dropped, for the first time in 6 years, to below 6 percent. And there was much rejoicing. But what most people don’t know is that this official rate is very narrowly defined, and that BLS also reports a number of other unemployment rates that include discouraged workers, part-time workers who would like to be full-time, and other people marginally attached to the labor force.

The broadest of these measures, known as U-6, is considered by many to be a better reflection of the true unemployment situation. But the government doesn’t publicize this number because every administration has an interest in reporting the lowest number possible to make itself look good. Fortunately for the rest of us, U-6 is available to anyone willing to look, and the most recent number reported is an unemployment rate of 11.8 percent, close to the highest option on the Pew survey, selected by a savvy 18 percent of Americans.

Granted, even U-6 has been falling in recent months, but this is not entirely good news. Even when accounting for discouraged workers, a shrinking labor force - that is, the pool of people able and willing to work within the economy - can drive the observed unemployment rate down, masking the true state of the labor market. For example, some people may be retiring earlier out of frustration, and may not necessarily show up as discouraged.

We know that something strange is going on, because the labor force participation rate, the share of people who want to work, has been steadily falling since 2007. This month, the number dropped to 62.7 percent, the lowest rate seen since February, 1978.

While the media continues to paint a rosy picture of an improving economy, the truth is that the recovery has been far slower than anyone wants to admit. Ordinary Americans outside the Beltway bubble sense this, and it is reflected in their answers to the Pew survey. When less than two-thirds of able-bodied adults are actually trying to work, we should all be worried.


http://www.freedomworks.org/content/what-official-jobs-numbers-arent-telling-you
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 04:05 pm
http://downtrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ppoh2-600x374.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 04:24 pm
Quote:
CDC Director Tom Frieden Was Left-Wing “Community Organizer” #Ebola


Now we know nothing is getting done except a possible voter registration drive in emergency rooms.

http://gotnews.com/cdc-director-left-wing-community-organizer/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gotnewsdotcom+%28Got+News%29
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 04:42 pm
@coldjoint,
Why is there 'pride' in being heterosexual? Sex is based on love; that's based on pride. Love = Pride.

Quote:
pride
prīd/
noun
1.
a feeling or deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements, the achievements of those with whom one is closely associated, or from qualities or possessions that are widely admired.
RexRed
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 04:49 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Why is there 'pride' in being heterosexual? Sex is based on love; that's based on pride. Love = Pride.

Quote:
pride
prīd/
noun
1.
a feeling or deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements, the achievements of those with whom one is closely associated, or from qualities or possessions that are widely admired.



There is pride in homosexuality only in response that some hateful and intolerant others believe there should be shame in it.

As long as others preach shame, LGBT people will proclaim our sincere and adamant pride in our sexual identities.



0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 05:10 pm
@Baldimo,
I think women know where their interests lie. You guys sowed the wind, the whirlwind is coming. Joke about it all you want, sounds like whistling past a graveyard to me.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 05:13 pm
@coldjoint,
Is that so you can remind yourself you're not gay? Why do you guys keep forgetting that? 'Cause we don't care.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 05:21 pm
@Baldimo,


Even Fox Defends Wendy Davis Ad About Abbott’s History of War Against Justice For Texans
By: Adalia Woodbury more from Adalia Woodbury
Sunday, October, 12th, 2014, 9:00 pm

Throughout the Davis/Abbott campaign, Wendy Davis exposed the fact that Greg Abbott believes in government for some of the people all of the time. The focus of Davis’ latest ad is to chronicle Abbott’s history of believing in justice for some while denying it to others.

The message behind the ad is that Abbott, like other Republicans, believes he got his so screw you.

Nothing exemplifies this more than Abbott’s efforts to deny people with disabilities the very benefit he got. It’s the same mentality that came with Paul Ryan’s effort to deny others access to the same social security benefits Ryan enjoyed once upon a time.

It’s par for the course for people who subscribe to the Ayn Rand theory that they are entitled to government help, but anyone else in the same position is just a lazy taker.

Abbott recovered millions of dollars in lawsuits after a falling tree injured his spine and left him paralyzed. No one faults him for that. The issue is his on-going battle to deny others the same benefit.

Wendy Davis’ latest ad documents this sordid history in what has been an on-going theme of Greg Abbott looking out for himself and his donors to the detriment of everyone else in Texas. The ad documents the fact that Abbott claimed a disabled woman really isn’t disabled because she has a prosthetic leg. Abbott ruled against a rape victim who sued a corporation that didn’t do a background check on a sexual predator.

Predictably, Abbott and his defenders tried to spin the ad into being about his disability. After all, we know just how much energy Abbott dedicates to defending minority rights. (sarcasm) We see Abbott’s defense of minority rights in laws that disenfranchise minorities and in his on going fight to deny women access to reproductive care, including abortions. When Abbott pals around with Ted Nugent and seeks out the white nationalist and misogynist, Charles Murray, to advise him on education policy, it’s all about protecting minority rights.

The reality is Abbott is a great advocate for that 1% who line his pockets be it to get government contracts, handouts, or simply keep their toxic chemicals a secret from the public.

Naturally, when Abbott runs interference for a hospital that continued to employ a socipathic neuro-surgeon after he botched several surgeries and left patients paralyzed it’s all about protecting a donor’s interests to the detriment of patients.

So when Wendy Davis calls him out for his history of denying rights to disabled Texans, Abbott whines that she’s being mean to him because he’s disabled.

In reality, Abbott is the one who exploited his disability for political gain. Davis’ ad was about Abbott’s history of fighting to deny other disabled people the justice that he got after his tragic accident. As my mother used to say, this is about Abbott wanting to sit on two chairs with one behind. On one hand, Abbott used his disability in several campaign ads for his advantage. On the other he claims that an ad attacking his hypocrisy when it comes to justice for people with disabilities is really about attacking his disability.

The moment Abbott decided to exploit his own disability for political gain, he opened the door to a public discussion about how he treats other people in the same position. Or as Fox Houston’s Legal Analyst, Chris Titico put it:

Greg Abbott can’t use his disability as a sword and a shield in this campaign. And he’s had several ads talking about his disability. That really makes it kind of fair game I think for Wendy Davis to talk About it.

Titico went on to say that Wendy Davis’ ad chronicles how Abbott “spent the rest of his career ensuring that others can’t get the same benefit he got.”

Mustafa Tameez nailed the politics behind Abbott’s attempt to spin the ad’s purpose and content. Throughout this campaign, Wendy Davis has steadily narrowed the gap between her and Abbott. In a race that began with Abbott being 20 points ahead, the gap is now a mere six and a half points. The fact that he is using his money to attack Davis proves this race is far more competitive than Abbott is willing to admit.

Watch the exchange between Titco and Tameez here.

It’s never good news for a Republican candidate when Fox takes their opponent’s side.

Texans are slowly seeing through the smoke and mirrors of Abbott’s war on disabled Texans who only want the same access to justice that Abbott had.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 05:31 pm
HOW BILL GATES HAS BEEN QUIETLY TRYING TO TRANSFORM GLOBAL HEALTH
http://www.nerdist.com/2014/10/how-bill-gates-has-been-quietly-trying-to-transform-global-health/
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 07:24 pm
Scott Walker Caught In 'Pay Not To Play' Scheme
http://crooksandliars.com/2014/10/scott-walker-caught-pay-not-play-scheme
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 08:43 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
When less than two-thirds of able-bodied adults are actually trying to work, we should all be worried.


What the hell are you smoking?

US population 16 - 64 204,000,000
http://www.census.gov/population/age/data/2012comp.html - table 1
US labor force - 155,000,000
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref1

I'll let you do the math. On second thought, you probably need help
155/204 = 75%

81% of those 65 and over are not in the labor force. I suppose you think they are just lazy takers, right cj? - table 13 on census link listed above.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 08:48 pm
@parados,
The biggest problem in this country is that wealth continues to concentrate into the very wealthy while the middle class and poor continue to lose buying power.

Although jobs are growing and our unemployment rates are dropping, those people that are working needs to be earning more money. The solution is to implement minimum wage laws. San Francisco has one of the highest minimum wage laws in the US, and their unemployment is 6.5%; not bad compared to the US rate of 5.9%. It was 6.1% recently.

Georgia's unemployment rate is 8.1%.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 09:06 pm
@parados,

Quote:
What the hell are you smoking?


How hard is it to keep that dig progressive dick lit?
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 09:14 pm
@parados,
He's smoking crack.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 14 Oct, 2014 09:20 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
How hard is it to keep that dig progressive dick lit?


Like Ronnie once said to Dukakis many times one October night, "There you go again!" You bring up dicks. Why do you do that? Do you like other people's dicks so much you spontaneously just have to bring them up, you can't help yourself? What is it with you and dicks?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 01/06/2025 at 12:01:34