RexRed
 
  1  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 09:20 am
https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-9/10305262_270229083158974_1592702846145923701_n.png

Our country is already broke from feeding the rich and their wars.

And when the rich need more money they just print it and then charge the middle class for it.

Vote OUT the GOP!!!
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 09:45 am
https://scontent-b-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/t1.0-9/1535397_244119492423119_886690048_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 10:04 am
@RexRed,
It isn't Bush Benghazi's. Bush didn't blame an anti-Islam internet video for the attacks. They claimed terrorism from the start. Gotta love you guys and the "Bush did it to" defense. Lame!
parados
 
  3  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 10:38 am
@Baldimo,
So what exactly do you think Congress is investigating about Benghazi?
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 10:49 am
@parados,
You can't say that the attacks under Bush were like the attacks under Obama. Bush didn't try and deflect when these things happen. Obama and his Admin have used an internet video to distract from the attack. They played a false narrative and now you guys are constantly playing the "Bush did it to defense". It doesn't play anymore. Obama said he was going to be better than Bush and so far he has been worse.

How many more things are going to pop on the radar that Obama didn't know about. So far most of the issues in his admin he didn't find out about until the news reported them. Would you have accepted that same line from Bush?
RexRed
 
  2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 11:01 am
https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t1.0-9/10402443_890018041015547_1144525238498627662_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 11:05 am
@Baldimo,
Yes, I would accept the same reason from Bush. It's a simple thing that things are confusing until the reasons are known. President's aren't omniscient. I recognize that.


You didn't answer my question. What do you think Congress is investigating? It certainly has a much different take on the situation than you do but you are more than happy to ignore what they are doing, it seems.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 11:07 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:
You can't say that the attacks under Bush were like the attacks under Obama. Bush didn't try and deflect when these things happen.

I'm am curious what you think Obama tried to deflect. Please be specific because I see nothing that supports that claim.
RexRed
 
  2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 11:15 am
@parados,
parados wrote:

Quote:
You can't say that the attacks under Bush were like the attacks under Obama. Bush didn't try and deflect when these things happen.

I'm am curious what you think Obama tried to deflect. Please be specific because I see nothing that supports that claim.


My question also

And what EXACTLY were the steps Bush took to prevent a repeat occurrence of our foreign embassies being attacked?

Apparently considering the amount of attacks on Bush's watch, he did NOTHING to prevent future attacks...

This problems still persisted into Obama's watch. So we can chalk up Benghazi as another failed republican policy along with the failed economy and a litany of other failures..

Consider there have not been repeat attacks, President Obama fixed this problem he did not stick his head in the sand like his republican predecessor...
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 11:17 am
@parados,
Quote:
I'm am curious what you think Obama tried to deflect. Please be specific because I see nothing that supports that claim.


The answer to that is everything. C'mon Shill aren't you tired of defending a traitor? Or are you just a traitor yourself? You certainly talk like one.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 11:52 am
Quote:
Obama Chomps On Gum During D-Day Anniversary Event…Update: France Not Happy

Would it kill this guy to show some respect?


It probably would, and that would be a good thing. I can't help thinking that the GIs buried there are churning in their graves as a traitor masquerading as president speaks about them.

http://weaselzippers.us/188765-obama-chomps-on-gum-during-d-dad-anniversary-event/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 12:17 pm
Quote:
‘I’m Just a Soul Whose Intentions Are Good’: Obama, Bergdahl and Moral Narcissism


Quote:
Moral Narcissism is an evocative term for the almost schizophrenic divide between intentions and results now common in our culture. It doesn’t matter how anything turns out as long as your intentions are good. And, just as importantly, the only determinant of those intentions, the only one who defines them, is you.

In other words, if you propose or do something, it only matters that you feel good or righteous about what you did or are proposing, that it makes you feel better personally. The results are irrelevant, as are how the actual activity affects others.

Also, although it pretends (especially to the self) to altruism, moral narcissism is in essence passive aggressive, asserting superiority over the ignorant or “selfish” other. It is elitist, anti-democratic and quote often, consciously or unconsciously, sadistic.

The Obama administration is loaded with moral narcissists, including, obviously, the president himself — Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton etc. The media and Hollywood are also clearly stuffed to the gills with moral narcissists.

Obamacare is a perfect example of moral narcissism in action. Never mind that the public didn’t want it. Never mind it was an atrociously planned bureaucratic mess (in fact that comes with the territory). It was what Barack Obama wanted — for himself.

http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2014/06/05/obama-bergdahl-moral-narcissism/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 12:38 pm
Quote:
A whopping 63% of Americans now believe our children will be worse off than we are

Pessimism, and poverty. It's the New Normal.

For the first time in a very long time, Americans aren't so sure their kids will have better lives than they do.

That's according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll that shows just one in three people believe "most children in this country will grow up to be better off" than their parents. (A whopping 63 percent said their kids will be worse off.) Not only are those numbers stunning but they are also a stunning reversal from CNN data at the end of the last century (1999 to be exact) -- when two thirds of Americans predicted that children would grow up to have it better than their parents.


Good job Barry.

http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/63-pct-say-kids-will-be-worse-off.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 12:47 pm
Quote:
D-Day Veteran Refuses Obama’s Invitation For Private White House Meeting…

I wonder why?
Quote:
George thought about it for awhile and concluded he just couldn’t. “I have so many issues with the president’s policies, including the most recent ones,” he told me ruefully. “I just couldn’t convince myself to do it.”


http://weaselzippers.us/188779-d-day-veteran-refuses-obamas-invitation-for-private-white-house-photo-op/

Quote:
He is not alone. The recent Bergdahl prisoner swap in which five hardened Taliban terrorists were released from prison is rubbing a lot of the military veterans attending D-Day events the wrong way. “It’s not that we don’t want to respect the commander-in-chief,” one told me sadly. “It’s just that he makes it so hard to do so.”


0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 12:56 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/t1.0-9/10457772_10152159615920679_427378423738929971_n.jpg

Busted!

Walmart tweeted that protesters at the company's headquarters were not actually employees but paid demonstrators. So the protesters responded by taking a photo with their employee ID cards.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 12:59 pm
@RexRed,
Quote:
Sessions: 7 Million Have Left Workforce Since Obama Took Office


Quote:
"Today’s jobs numbers are only enough to tread even with population growth, maintaining unemployment at 6.3 percent. When you include discouraged workers, the unemployment rate doubles to an alarming 12.2 percent. There are still 3.2 million fewer full-time employed persons than there were in 2007," says Sessions.

"Since President Obama came into office in 2009, 7.2 million people have left the workforce entirely. One out of every six men aged 25–54 is not working. Employment in this group fell by 72,000 last month, while the number of employed women aged 25–54 fell by 37,000. Meanwhile, the workforce participation rate for women is at its lowest level in 23 years. Median household income is down almost $2,300 from what it was when the President took office. Real wages are lower than they were in 1999. Growth in the first quarter of this year was negative.

"These numbers are grim and make clear that this economy is nowhere close to performing at an acceptable level.
"


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/sessions-7-million-have-left-workforce-obama-took-office_794443.html?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed#.U5IHDVpifrg.twitter
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 01:03 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
I'm am curious what you think Obama tried to deflect. Please be specific because I see nothing that supports that claim.


The answer to that is everything. C'mon Shill aren't you tired of defending a traitor? Or are you just a traitor yourself? You certainly talk like one.


You ******* retarded illiterate idiot...

I still waiting for you to respond on the graphs I posted that show Americans have millions more jobs than when Bush was in office!

We also have hundreds of thousands of our troops HOME on our own soil now too.

And that translates to traitor to you?

Goober, racist sociopath...

http://www.gq.com/news-politics/blogs/death-race/Jobs%20Chart635.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 01:03 pm
Quote:

37.2%: Percentage Not in Labor Force Remains at 36-Year High



http://cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/large/images/aaa1_1002.jpg
From the same source as Rex
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/372-percentage-not-labor-force-remains-36-year-high#.U5HLRHEu19k.twitter
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 01:04 pm
@RexRed,
Quote:
You ******* retarded illiterate idiot...


And you are a frustrated homo who thinks this country owes him(and everyone else) a living.
RexRed
 
  3  
Fri 6 Jun, 2014 01:18 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:

37.2%: Percentage Not in Labor Force Remains at 36-Year High



http://cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/large/images/aaa1_1002.jpg
From the same source as Rex
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/372-percentage-not-labor-force-remains-36-year-high#.U5HLRHEu19k.twitter


And you don't think raising the minimum wage, which is one of President Obama's main goals would, err, fix that?

And your republican traitor$ are $TRONGLY against paying Americans fairly for their labor while they $TRONGLY promote outsourcing jobs overseas...

And you don't think the corporations paying their fair share of taxes also might lift a bit of the tax burden off Americans and provide labor force incentives to get out and work?

Once again you have shown your info is straight out of the lies dept of Fox News...

Look how the republicans have tried to force Obama to ruin our economy!

And whose fault is that again???!!!
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 07:26:10