coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 20 May, 2014 11:04 am
http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/Climate_Chaos_Synonyms.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  4  
Tue 20 May, 2014 11:10 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Secretive Soros-backed group looking to spend nearly $40M in 2014


Talk about buying elections. This is what you prefer? A socialist billionaire pulling strings in the country he wishes to destroy. That is what Bob, Rex, and Parados are supporting. Deliberate lies and manipulation of the system that is in the control of our first blatantly anti-American president.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/20/soros-backed-democracy-alliance-looking-to-spend-nearly-40m-in-2014/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

I guess Fox forgot to mention that Adelson spent over $100 million in 2012 and has pledged that much again while the Koch's are spending over $125 million.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101676377
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 11:10 am
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3DirWL67bDw/U3QzzvEKo0I/AAAAAAAAQOM/QnGaq17bzf4/s1600/PC+in+Short.png
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 20 May, 2014 11:11 am
@parados,
Quote:
I guess Fox forgot to mention


Anything you ever fail to mention? Like the billionaire behind the blocking of the Keystone pipeline?
parados
 
  3  
Tue 20 May, 2014 11:13 am
@coldjoint,
Who is doing more to buy elections? The man who spends $40 million or the one that spends $100 million? Who should we be more concerned about?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 11:16 am
@parados,
Quote:
Who is doing more to buy elections?


You are not including the entitlements. Hands down it is the taxpayers that pay so Democrats can buy elections with handouts.
parados
 
  4  
Tue 20 May, 2014 12:29 pm
@coldjoint,
That's funny Pinkie. When it is shown your millionaires pay more to buy the government you respond with the Democrats are buying votes. I love how you abandon your arguments so quickly. It shows you have no convictions and no facts.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:09 pm
@parados,
Quote:
When it is shown your millionaires pay more to buy the government you respond with the Democrats are buying votes.


They are. The same as that billionaire is helping buy Cap and Trade. But the handouts Democrats support buy plenty of votes. Which is their plan. That is why the Black voters are kept where they are.

You know all this Parados. The progressive agenda is more than clear. And when you look at it, it is all the same subject. Maybe a nit picking shill thinks differently, but who cares. I don't.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:14 pm
Quote:
Allen West: Obama Has No “Honor, Integrity, or Character”


Well said. And amply demonstrated by Obama.
Quote:
West’s recent blast of the president comes in the form of a blog post published on his website, in which he calls Obama “the epitome of weakness” and slams the president for stealing the spotlight away from the men being honored for their bravery and sacrifice.


I guess West forgot to say Obama is a conceited prick. Don't worry, I got it covered.

http://conservativetribune.com/allen-west-obama-has-no-honor/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:38 pm
Gay marriage bans are being overturned; Oregon, Utah, and PA. How many states still have gay marriage bans, and how long will they last?
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:41 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Gay marriage bans are being overturned;

Getting a divorce?
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:45 pm
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2014/140520-theres-a-reasonable-debate-to-be-had-over-common-core-standards.jpg
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:49 pm
@coldjoint,
Says the guy who posts in pink in as bitchy a tone I've ever seen. Rolls right off your tongue, junior. Are you finally telling us something about yourself? Its alright to be yourself.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 02:56 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Are you finally telling us something about yourself?


I have already told you I don't matter. The facts do. If you wish to play games, I have no problem handling dickheads like you. I still have plenty of time to post about Obamas lies and agenda. And just one more scandal Obama read about in the paper, that people will be held accountable for. How many times has the country heard that? Only to find out it is just another empty promise just like his administration.

Obama attracts his kind. Arrogant and selfish and controlling. And you are proof of that. You have demonstrated it daily.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 20 May, 2014 03:04 pm
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/gop-hopeful-monica-wehby-accused-harrassment-stalking

http://www.msnbc.com/sites/msnbc/files/styles/ratio--83-34--830x340/public/articles/senate_oregon.jpeg-0808d.jpg?itok=alqeVTrb

GOP Senate hopeful Monica Wehby accused of harrassment, stalking
05/19/14 08:00 PM—Updated 05/20/14 09:54 AM

facebook twitter 0 save share group 55
By Irin Carmon

Until recently, Oregon Republican Senate hopeful Monica Wehby was known mostly as a rare chance for the GOP hopeful to be competitive in a blue state, and a candidate with a campaign ad quickly dubbed one of the best of the year. But on the eve of the state’s primary Tuesday, Wehby’s Republican and Democratic opponents are seizing on another way to define her – as an unstable stalker.

On Monday, The Oregonian published a 2007 police report about an altercation between Wehby and her soon-to-be-ex-husband Jim Grant, in which he accused her of “ongoing harassment.” The couple has accused each other of acting violently, with Grant admitting to it: ”Jim said over the last year Monica has pulled his hair, slapped him and thrown items at him. Jim said he had been violent with her in the past approximately three years or so ago.”

This follows revelations that in April 2013, Wehby’s ex-boyfriend, Andrew Miller, called the police to complain that she was “stalking” him and had repeatedly entered his home uninvited. Politico reported on the incident Friday, on the morning of the primary debate. On the same day, The Oregonian published audio of the call.

Though Miller said at the time he would seek a protective order against Wehby, he didn’t, and now says he regrets the call. “There was a week there or so when we were breaking up that people can be emotional. And me included,” Miller told Politico.

Wehby said in a statement, “A year ago I went through the process of concluding a relationship. That relationship ended amicably, and while I’m not pleased that it has been deemed newsworthy, I guess that is the cost of challenging the political status quo.”

There’s another bend in this convoluted tale: Earlier this month, the Democratic Party of Oregon filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, alleging Wehby’s campaign was improperly coordinating with a super PAC to which Miller is a major donor. The group has run ads attacking Wehby’s primary opponent, Jason Conger. Miller has also donated to Wehby’s Senate campaign.

Wehby’s campaign has denied the allegations.

At the Republican debate Friday, Conger said the incident raised questions about Wehby’s judgment. The right-leaning Daily Caller referred to Wehby’s “weird past” and questioned whether the Republican establishment was properly vetting candidates.

The Rachel Maddow Show, 5/19/14, 10:53 PM ET
Political weirdness finds a home in Oregon

Before the report about Wehby’s ex-husband, National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee spokesman Brad Dayspring was treating the disclosure about Wehby’s ex-boyfriend as an opportunity to deflect Democratic claims of a “war on women.” Dayspring blamed Democrats, whom he claimed had “waged a war to personally destroy Republican Senate candidates, particularly strong Republican women.” He added that Democrats had “resorted to vicious personal attacks that would almost certainly classify as sexist by their own definition.” He did not say whether he himself would classify it as sexist.

Asked whether focusing on Wehby’s brush with the police over her breakup was sexist, an Oregon Democratic stategist said, “That’s laughable.”

The late-in-the-race specter of Wehby as a Fatal Attraction-like spurned woman will likely be blunted by the fact that the state has mail-in voting that has been going on for weeks. (The last day to mail in primary ballots was May 6, though they can also be dropped off at a municipal clerk’s office through Tuesday evening.)

But if Wehby wins the primary, the revelations could hurt her in the general election A poll recently released by a NewRepublican.org, a group advocating for Wehby, showed Wehby with a wide lead in the primary overall, including with the 37 percent of voters who had already mailed their ballots.

The primary winner will face first-term incumbent Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley. Republicans have been gleeful at the prospect of a competitive Senate contest in a largely Democratic state.

Wehby, the director of pediatric neurosurgery at a Portland children’s hospital, was an early and prominent opponent of the Affordable Care Act, the rollout of which has been particularly rocky in Oregon. She has a catchy slogan, “Keep your doctor. Change your senator,” and a heartwarming ad, “Trust,” which gained national attention. It portrays Wehby as the compassionate savior of a tearful woman who was told to terminate a much-wanted pregnancy because of a fetal spine disorder. “We have a twelve year old today because of Dr. Wehby,” Lexi Liebelt says.

The ad also neatly elides the fact that Wehby says (at times nebulously) that while she is personally opposed to abortion she does not want the federal government involved in a woman’s decision – making her the subject of a barrage of attack ads from social conservatives in the primary.

If Wehby makes it to the general election, Democrats face a tricky path, portraying a relative moderate as an extreme who would help put the Senate in the hands of the GOP. They have pointed to her uncertain position on contraceptive coverage on employer insurance plans, currently before the Supreme Court. (In a radio interview, Wehby said the coverage was “more of a benefit package than actual insurance for real health problems.”) She also has sent some very mixed signals on how she would vote on Supreme Court nominees. Here’s how the Willamette Week described it:

“We asked all five candidates in this race a fairly simple question: which U.S. Supreme Court justice most closely mirrors your values? After one candidate named Justice Anthony Kennedy, Wehby piggybacked on the answer. After Conger gave a ringing endorsement of arch-conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, Wehby awkwardly changed her answer to Scalia as well. (Outside the interview, she told us she really meant to say Chief Justice John Roberts, but that she actually likes Justice Samuel Alito best of all.)”

In other words, it’s not too late to define Wehby, since it’s not clear if she has defined herself.
Explore:
Abortion, Affordable Care Act, Democrats, Election 2014, Elections, Equality, Health, Health Care Reform, Republicans, War On Women, Women and Women in Politics
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 03:17 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Are you finally telling us something about yourself?


I have already told you I don't matter. The facts do. If you wish to play games, I have no problem handling dickheads like you. I still have plenty of time to post about Obamas lies and agenda. And just one more scandal Obama read about in the paper, that people will be held accountable for. How many times has the country heard that? Only to find out it is just another empty promise just like his administration.

Obama attracts his kind. Arrogant and selfish and controlling. And you are proof of that. You have demonstrated it daily.



Just to clear this up for me, CJ...is the Obama person you are speaking of the guy what was twice elected to the highest office in the land...by the citizens of this country?
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Tue 20 May, 2014 04:14 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
These guys lie with abandon, but still get elected into office. What's wrong with this picture? LOL
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 06:13 pm

A FaceBook poster wrote:
NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS did I think I'd thank Rick Santorum for anything but Judge Jones who wrote the eloquent decision striking down Pennsylvania's gay marriage ban was selected and endorsed by Santorum and nominated by George W. Bush. We should all send Little Ricky thank you telegrams.


Comment: Haha, I would not go as far as thanking him. Only if it might burn his onion. Smile
RexRed
 
  3  
Tue 20 May, 2014 06:33 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1.0-9/10403230_10154200111095093_3111492339487010242_n.png
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Tue 20 May, 2014 06:52 pm
@RexRed,
These darned activist judges Smile (cynical)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 07:30:31