On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

Previous • Post: # 5,616,223 • Next
View Profilecoldjoint
-2
ReplyeditDeletereport Mon 24 Mar, 2014 08:57 pm
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/liberal-logic-101-564.jpg
Signature We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.

Above is a meme I posted. The picture has been deleted. . Why the censorship? Cheap shot liberals.

This has happened 5 or 6 times.

0 Replies

It is becoming more than clear that any grief from a conservative that hits a bullseye will not be tolerated on this forum. Although some say I am not conservative, I am certainly not a liberal and God forbid a progressive.

But that is not important when what I post, or anyone else is censored because it might show our president and his party are hypocrites, Socialists, and Communists. And please do not say that the connection of the dots do not show the influence of these ideologies in the Democratic party to a point where the Constitution and the truth no longer matter.

Is that what to do? Run from another solution by disrespecting it? Blocking it from view because it doesn't fit an agenda this forum obviously supports.

This place is already loaded with shills probably being paid for with tax dollars. What worries the powers that be here so much? Anyone think I will get an answer?

Delete this one.

http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/liberal-logic-101-641.jpg

2 Replies

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
You are the one posting memes that reference the past

I believe had 2014 in it. That is now the past?

If you check 2014, then Priorities USA isn't even close to the top since it has spent ZERO. So that makes Tea Party MATH even more suspect since the TEA PARTY Patriots Fund has raised over $6 million. I doubt Stabanow has been hired to head that Super Pac. I gave you the benefit of the doubt by going back to 2014. They were at least in the top 10. Now they aren't even in the top 30.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
Open Secrets is NOT Open Society Foundation.

I didn't say they were. Pay attention shill. I showed that Open Society contributes a substantial sum of money to them.

You didn't show anything. You made a stupid statement and now are making an even stupider one. I would love to see your evidence that Open Society has contributed to Open Secrets.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Is that what to do? Run from another solution by disrespecting it? Blocking it from view because it doesn't fit an agenda this forum obviously supports.

This place is already loaded with shills probably being paid for with tax dollars. What worries the powers that be here so much? Anyone think I will get an answer?

Delete this one.

The problem isn't A2K. The problem is you are using links that liberallogic is blocking. Talk to the conservatives that are censoring your posts. Every one of your links takes me to a 403 page that states the following.

Quote:

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /wp-content/uploads/2013/11/liberal-logic-101-564.jpg on this server.
Apache/2.2 Server at liberallogic101.com Port 80

Do you always blame liberals for your own stupidity?

2 Replies

https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/1959821_730244697020865_508337742_n.jpg

Should this also apply for bullying religious people too?

This is what our tax dollars go to, lobbying legislators to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Well how about religious orientation?

0 Replies

@parados,

yes, parados, coldjoint always does blame liberals for his own stupidity. I was pretty sure his cites were being blocked by their poster, not by a2k, because the same thing has happened before with pictures protected under copyright (which isn't always obvious until they end up blocked)--pictures and written material that had no political content whatsoever.

Now that coldjoint knows that it is greedy capitalits who are trying to shake him down for royalty payments and make him pay through the nose, I'm sure he'll be willing to pay to post them, since he's all in favor of free enterprise, right?

Getting just a mite paranoid aren't you, joint? About "shills" being paid with "tax dollars" to post here? Yeah, riiiiggghhhttt. Don't we wish? I would LOVE to get tax dollars to post here. Can you tell me how to go about signing up for the government program? Were you part of the Bush program of paying shills to write posts justifying his crashing the economy, doublinnational debt, and making millions of dollars of what amounted to welfare payments for the super rich? (hint: that didn't exist either, just like your fantasy)

1 Reply

@parados,

GOP logic? A myth... Smile

0 Replies

@parados,

That comes from your link from their funding page, shill.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

yes, parados, coldjoint always does blame liberals for his own stupidity.

Tell me what do you liberals blame your stupidity on? Are you going to take credit for something you did on your own?

Quote:

Getting just a mite paranoid aren't you, joint? About "shills"

Has Parados ever denied that he is?

0 Replies

Quote:

(3) A party shill. This would be someone paid to push the platform of a political party of movement -- the Democrats, the Republicans, the Libertarians, the Tea Party, etc. This person would be a bit harder to spot because he'd write on a very broad set of topics, without major preoccupations. However, he'd reveal himself by the strict orthodoxy of his political opinions -- for example, always taking the same positions as the Obama administration or the conservative movement, without any significant eccentric positions.

0 Replies

It has long been whispered around the libertarian quarter of the blogosphere (where I usually hang out) that government shills patrol the web spreading disinformation on websites authored by people who question the official governmental line on any controversial topic. Anyone who has ever questioned a post on climate change and pointed out that 'the science is not settled' and though we know the climate is changing because the climate changes constantly, to suggest it is caused by carbon Dioxide emissions from human activity is an over simplification will have been subjected to a lynch mob of hate attacks.

Likewise anybody who declines to agree that same sex marriage will be the greatest leap forward for civilization in two thousand years. Dissent is not tolerated and in the case of bearded queens in bridal gowns, tolerance is not enough, we are required to celebrate making a mockery of a tradition that means a great deal to many people.

Where do you think they come from, all these angry people who will stay in comment threads, spewing their hate at you until you decide life is too short to waste time on such stuff and walk away? Some people have said they are government and corporate shills, paid to suppress free speech on the web by bullying and using diversion, deflection, misrepresentation and downright lies to cast doubt on anything the dissenters say.

How many thousands of times have I been called a Conspiracy Theorist or a paranoid right wing nut job for talking about what I knew of government and corporate surveillance. Come on, I worked with digital networks, helped develop early generations of some of these technologies.

So who wanted to discredit me, who did not want what I said to go unchallenged? Let's face it, in the scheme of things I am nobody so which organizations might feel threatened by my information? Who would pay people to search out dissent and try to discredit those who post it?

http://www.greenteethmm.com/online-shills-conspiracy.shtml

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Blocking it from view because it doesn't fit an agenda this forum obviously supports.

actually the problem seems to be with the source of your links - have you confirmed that they allow sharing of their images/use of their bandwidth?

1 Reply

Last year, an anonymous author confessed that he had worked as a paid shill targeting several popular alternative websites to spread disinformation. It seems he was just one soldier in a barmy army of professional trolls. These online personalities, known as â€œsock puppetsâ€, will allow the government to "create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives."

Sound familiar? You see it in action daily.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Do they work for the NSA or the CIA, cj, or maybe for DCOA.

0 Replies

@ehBeth,

Then why do some stay? And are you denying this forum is biased?

2 Replies

@coldjoint,

Cj: And are you denying this forum is biased?

All your posts are terribly biased, cj. That has been explained to you umpteen thousand times.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Quote:

It has long been whispered around the libertarian quarter of the blogosphere (where I usually hang out) that government shills patrol the web spreading disinformation on websites authored by people who question the official governmental line on any controversial topic.

Let's say that its true. Do you think that the Repugs, with their huge treasure chests, wouldn't be doing the same?

What you're describing is the USA as totalitarian state.

0 Replies

@JTT,

Quote:

All your posts are terribly biased, cj. That has been explained to you umpteen thousand times.

I don't own the forum.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Quote:

I don't own the forum.

That has nothing to do with the fact that you post memes.

1 Reply

On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know