On Voting Republicans Out Of Office

I think we should start referring to your leaps of illogic as "The Pink fallacy".

Because you are not paid doesn't mean others are paid. What kind of an idiot would even jump that conclusion? It's a pink fallacy.

It's what happens when you stop thinking for yourself and allow yourself to be brainwashed by Fox News.

and each instance shall be referred to as a "Pink Phallus"...

To you guys everything is apocalyptic. "The sky is falling the sky is falling!!!" A bunch of chicken littles, a herd of sheeple, perfect candidates for the propaganda meisters pushing new boogeymen.

And who else would answer with a classic liberal slur about intelligence? Right Shill?

And what should we call but a hanger on who thinks he finds cool memes to post? Frank Jr. Start sucking, or should I say keep sucking?

How about Dingleberry?

Let's see how Obamas allies are doing in Syria. We have, and do supply arms to these factions.

http://therightscoop.com/unbelievable-human-slaughter-houses-exposed-in-syria-with-decapitated-bodies-hanging-like-meat/

Thanks to Earth Day Network (via the The Sierra Club): "This sculpture by Issac Cordal in Berlin is called "Politicians discussing global warming."

In Syria they could sit in Christian blood. Right Obama?

How about the oath of president and the defending the Constitution? Try again.
Unless you wish to apply that to Islam and the mosques were sedition goes on daily.

Finally! A Republican willing to fess up about his party's zest for voting reforms.

In an appearance on the Devil’s Advocate radio show (The Mic/92.1 FM) last week, State Sen Rep. Dale Schultz told hosts Mike Crute and Dominic Salvia that his party’s support for a series of election law changes was indefensible.

“I am not willing to defend them anymore,” he explained when Salvia asked why Republicans sought to limit the number of voting hours a municipality could offer. “I’m just not and I’m embarrassed by this.”

Last week, Schultz argued that there were no legitimate justifications for some of the election reforms pushed by Republicans.

“It’s all predicated on some belief there is a massive fraud or irregularities, something my colleagues have been hot on the trail for three years and have failed miserably at demonstrating,” he said.

“It’s just sad when a political party has so lost faith in its ideas that it’s pouring all of its energy into election mechanics,” Schultz said. “We should be pitching as political parties our ideas for improving things in the future rather than mucking around in the mechanics and making it more confrontational at the voting sites and trying to suppress the vote.”

My hat is off to this brave Republican.

Another Charlie Crist, who cares?

And how many have paid? And what about the 7 million they needed, or was that another lie?