@coldjoint,
If most leading conservatives hadn't consistently defended segregation for decades, perhaps they would be perceived differently by more minority individuals today. Embracing the likes of Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms did not help conservatives in that regard. When David Duke was elected to the Louisiana House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich actually said that if Duke simply watched what he publicly
said for a few years, he would be welcomed into the Republican Party. The recent ruling by the Republican majority on the SCOTUS to eviscerate the Voting Rights Act -- which, incidentally, is not related to welfare dependency (a legitimate issue) in any way, shape, or form -- didn't help, either. I could go on and on.
This country needs a third political party that would deal with the problem of welfare dependency while continuing to protect hard-fought gains in civil rights, but that simply isn't going to happen. In other words, unfortunately, we're stuck with the "same old, same old."
Just to remind you: No, I'm not a liberal. I'm not a conservative, either. I also live in a state -- namely, Texas -- that is a one-party state. That means that in most instances voting is a waste of time. Of course, it could also be argued that my participation in never-ending political threads (such as this one) is a waste of time! (I'm say that as a putdown of myself.)
Nothing is accomplished.