19
   

If a man claims to be Jesus today, how can you tell if it is true or false?

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 06:02 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

My example was just to show those who still believe in Santa that changing natural laws is tantamount to changing all the rules of what they believe; nothing more, nothing less.


Santa Claus is a ******* ****. Saint Nicholas **** off. I much prefer the Holly King...Father Christmas. They are NOT the same.

**** http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/images/santa-claus-chimney.jpg

Not a ****http://merlinspath.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/hollyking.jpg
0 Replies
 
Krumple
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 06:32 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Krumple wrote:

I would not want to live for ever.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

Really? are you absolutly sure without ever seeing Heaven?


Yes I am sure and I don't have to see it to know. The problem is the elements that make up this existence help to define who we are. If those elements were different (which they would have to be if heaven were true) then you would not be the same being at all in heaven. I don't mean just slightly different but almost completely 99% different. If you are that different then basically you are not the same individual.

For example, are there risky sports in heaven? Like rock climbing or surfing? How would they be risky in heaven? The part of these sports that make them enjoyable is the chance that while doing them you could get injured or killed. Now this is not the ONLY reason people do dangerous sports but part of the thrill of doing them is the danger element which would be non-existent in heaven. So nothing dangerous would exist in heaven. Therefore many of the things people find exciting such as roller coasters and sky diving wouldn't be as enjoyable as they are in this existence because the danger element is gone.

Krumple wrote:

I doubt you have even considered the consequences of what that would mean.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

You and I are both humans and think alike a lot of times...I have thought of probably EVERY situation or (consequence) you have too...just because we differ at times does not mean that we don't think alike at many times in a journey called life...I think personally your trying to envision limitless things compared to things that have limits and boundries....which defeats itself...


I'm not exactly sure what you are referring to when you say I am trying to envision limitless things. I am saying a consequence of heaven is that the elements of our lives would be drastically different. For example the individuality that makes up your personality is shaped by the failures and successes from this existence. Whereas in a heaven those things that shaped your personality would not be present because failure is not an option.

Krumple wrote:

I have and there is absolutely no way that could make it a good thing.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

If you say you have, and you see bad things or hell as we believers call it, then why couldn't the opposite end of the spectrum exhist in Heaven?


What I mean to say there is that I have pondered what existence in a heaven would be like. I have spent hours and hours imagining what things would be like and how things would function and certain problems arise that can not be addressed because of how heaven would have to operate. There are certain aspects that you could determine that heaven could not be.

Such as is there death in heaven? Is there injury in heaven? Do you get sick? Do you experience pain? Do you experience sadness or depression? Do you experience insecurity? It is these simple emotions that generate stimulation in our lives when we combat them which brings value to the activities we seek out to battle those emotions. If those emotions do not exist in heaven then the pursuit of pleasures or enjoyment has no meaning and no risk of failure. It would just be empty motions without purpose.

Krumple wrote:

The idea itself cheapens this life and renders it worthless.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

I disagree, if ANYTHING to me it shows that do good here and be rewarded later, do bad and pay later...making it ESSENTIAL to DO GOOD THINGS HERE ON EARTH!


I personally do not like the idea that a person would be faced with eternal punishment for a finite crime. If a person does something bad, I think it is mean to punish them forever for that wrong doing. Likewise I think it just as unfair to reward someone permanently for some minor "good" they did. This does not even address what would constitute doing "bad" or doing "good" anyways. Everyone seems to have their own ideas of what they would include and if those things can not be 100% determined then how do you know you are doing what it takes to qualify?

Krumple wrote:

You honestly think that an after life would be similar to this one?


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

In some ways yes, and in some ways No, simply put...


From my thought experiments an existence in heaven could be no where near or like this existence. It would have to be almost 99% different for it to work how it is described.

Krumple wrote:

It is the struggle itself which gives this life value and meaning.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

really? you like to struggle? I don't...


My point exactly. I did not say that I liked struggle, my point is that struggle is the enemy that we seek to overcome which brings value to our successes. When we succeed at something we gain pleasure and enjoyment from it because we know we have over come the struggle. But in heaven this struggle would not exist and therefore our value for success would not arise. We would only do things to do them and receive no enjoyment from them.

Krumple wrote:

If there is no struggle then it will become boring and have no value.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

You feel you NEED to fail in order to succeed? I don't....


No but it is necessary to have the possibility of failure. In heaven there wouldn't be this possibility of failure. If failure is not a possibility then the enjoyment and pleasure we get out of our success could not arise. The thrill of victory would not exist because it relies on the chance of failure.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

there is NO way for me to debate this next comment because it seems you ALREADY have your ideas on HEAVEN and have never seen it or anything of its nature...


Couldn't I say the same about you? I think you have not thought about it enough. Perhaps I have it all wrong and am willing to entertain that thought but the problem is I can't take the aspects of who I am and what makes me, "ME" and see myself being who I am. For example, music. The kinds of music that I enjoy have a lot of emotional drive which is based off failures and successes. Without such failures being possible much of the music that I enjoy would be meaningless. The music would be boring because you can't write a meaningful tune about the chance of failure if failure does not exist. Therefore I conclude that song writing in heaven would be boring because it would be nothing other than about success.

Krumple wrote:

If there is no struggle then it will become boring and have no value.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

All I can say is I completely disagree...


Well I think that you disagree because you don't like the fact that what I have to say is a problem for heaven. You want it to be peachy and perfect without any turmoil or hardship. But as I have pointed out, it is the turmoil and hardship which makes this life have value and meaning. We cherish people in our lives because we know we have limited time with them and not only that but our relationships are prone to failures. So when our relationships succeed they bring us joy and pleasure because we have overcome the possibility of failure.

Krumple wrote:

Those who believe in an after life only consider one thing, that their ego will not die.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

Has NOTHING to do with egos...matter of fact the whole concept of being one with everyone and God, shows Unity, and submission to God...2 things a lot of people WILL NEVER EVEN ATTEMPT here on earth...proving it is HARDER and GREATER things exhist in HEAVEN if it exhists....


It has everything to do with the ego. We value and cherish our experience of life and we don't want to think that one day we will stop experiencing existence. We don't like the thought that we will never do anything ever again. So we invent these ideas that a heaven exists where we will do the things we love with the people that we love for the rest of time.

Krumple wrote:

They don't like the idea that they will cease to exist one day and that scares the hell out of them.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

It does not scare the hell out of me if we just rot in the ground...it scares the hell out of me if people deny God and hell exhists if the have to step foot in there...I fear for the non believers who may or may not be condemned, and ones who do malicious acts on earth, I pry ALL will be forgiven...so I in turn am too....


If a god does exist who has a place reserved for those who do not meet his expectation and wants them to suffer there for eternity then in my opinion I want nothing to do with said god. Why? Because in my opinion torturing a being endlessly for a bad choice is just plain mean. It's why I object to sharia law. I think cutting someones hand off for a crime is inhumane and mean because it punishes them for the rest of their life for some crime that is finite. Same for capital punishment, I think killing someone for a crime is inhumane and mean. Torturing a being for eternity for making a bad choice is inhumane and mean.

Krumple wrote:

So they embrace the idea that they will exist for ever as a way of easing their mind to the inevitable reality that they won't.


XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

trying to embrace life forever is Harder or a greater feat then trying to except we all die and rot in the ground, so I don't understand what makes you think Grasping an afterlife is in ANYWAY is others easing their minds to the inevitable reality that they won't exhist....sorry the facts don't support that theory, maybe YOU think that way I do not...


Like I mentioned. We are attached to our egos and we cherish our experience of life and we don't want it to end. So people invent these heaven ideas to ease their mind because it basically means their experience will continue and not just stop. Not only that but people also want those people they don't like to suffer and the people they do like to be happy. Which if you ask me is really selfish and quite unsympathetic.

Why is it during a funeral even if all the people there know the person was a bad person they will still claim that they are in heaven? I have never seen a funeral where the pastor actually says the deceased is in hell. It would never happen because all they are there to do is try to comfort the living. So it doesn't matter how wicked or evil the person was they would still say they are residing in heaven. That right there is a key point that the concept itself is just a way to lie to oneself about the inevitability of ceasing to exist.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 06:39 pm
@Krumple,
I'm sure you put a lot of time and effort into that, but it's just a load of old bollocks. You're a ******* idiot, I couldn't be arsed to read it.
Krumple
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 06:51 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:
People do not age in Heaven, from what I have seen in my visions they are between 21 and 30 yrs of age and all are the same,


All the same age? So babies that died young would all of a sudden become 21-30 years old? If you were their parent you wouldn't even recognize them. You could try to argue that you would instinctively recognize them but you wouldn't have any memories of them growing up or aging, so it would be silly. Or seeing your grandparents at 21-30 the same age as you would be silly too. Why is everyone the same age? And why 21-30? That to me sounds like a made up idea because it is some idealistic age.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

one would believe...the ugliest in Heaven, is incredibly more beautiful than the MOST beautiful here...


Now this is something I mentioned earlier. If you become more beautiful in heaven then that means your features would have to change. If your features change then you are not the same person you were when you were living on earth. So you are basically saying you won't be the same person that you use to be. If that is the case then why would you think anything about you would remain the same? Does your personality improve to because in some ways that is what makes people ugly. So I guess you get a perfect personality in heaven too. Which would only change you more.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

2. I see we have mansions in Heaven in which we live in, the size depends on our actions here...there are countless activities, I have been to things like casinos in dreams, but the gambling aspect is gone,


Why call them casinos then if there is no gambling? LOL seriously I am beginning to wonder if maybe you have a disorder that needs to be examined or diagnosed.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

I have seen deceased relatives dancing in Heaven...my grandmother loved to play bingo and she tells me from time to time she plays bingo etc....anything that is good probably exhists, and is enhanced simply put


Bingo? Wow I can't wait for heaven, there will be bingo.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

3. there is NO sex in Heaven, the Bible says they are neither wed in Heaven nor given to be wed in Heaven, from then on we will be like brothers and sisters, and be SO COMPLETE with others and around God that earthy desires will be gone...


Earthly desires will be gone. So there goes a huge amount of what you know about yourself and what makes up who you are. It is our earthly desires that make us do the things that we do and live our lives by. If you remove them it is like removing a part of yourself so in other words you become less than who you are in heaven. (As I have been pointing out to you)

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

if there is such a thing as sole mates, then if we have children it is done by immaculate conception and NOT sex...then the children probably are angels in Heaven if it does exhist but I am not so sure that it does....


This is (forehead smacking) absurdity. You can have children and it is done through immaculate conception and not sex? What is the point in having children in heaven?

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

4. they will age enough (If it exhists but I don't really believe it does) to where the children understand and can be angels in Heaven...


They will age? But no one else does? Hmm strange inconsistencies in the whole aging phenomena. Not surprised that there are inconsistencies though because you are basically making it up.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

5. Yes, they do have free will, but you would never want to do evil, so your doing good ALL the time always around good, but away from evil things, thoughts and desires,


This is a contradiction in terms. You have free will to do what ever you want but you can't do evil? You do good things all the time? What is preventing you from doing evil? You don't have free will if you can't have the possibility of doing evil. It is the very definition of what free will is.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

You are free to do the Goodness you desire as you please, but certain times and events such as dinner with God is appointed but because the rightous are disciplined they know and understand these things...


Then you are not free, you are a mind slave to what you refer to as being righteous.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

6. Simple one, because people in Heaven have no DESIRE TO DO EVIL things like humans on earth do from time to time...you have free choices but your so perfected your free choices are ALWAYS GOOD things....


Then once again you would not be the same person in heaven that you are now. You would be a drastically different being. If you are so different then you basically are not even the same person or being.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

7. If apple trees exhist in Heaven, which I am sure they do, then it is not a sin to eat apples...the ONLY way sin exhists now with eating apples is gorging yourself in nothing but apples, but again Heaven is perfected, so therefor, eating one would probably satisfy that one person...


This doesn't make any sense either. So originally eating an apple was forbidden but now it's not? And god punished all of man kind for eating the apple in the past but now it's fine? Seriously? How is it that you can say these things and not realize the absurdity of them?
Krumple
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 07:04 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

I'm sure you put a lot of time and effort into that, but it's just a load of old bollocks. You're a ******* idiot, I couldn't be arsed to read it.


Not surprised to hear that because you are one who only wants to hear your own opinion and care nothing about anything else. Pretty typical of a person who holds no value of education or the learning process.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 07:20 pm
@Krumple,
Keep posting. You really give me a laugh. I like ******* idiots, they never learn. You're going to be a lot of fun.
Krumple
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 07:30 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Keep posting. You really give me a laugh. I like ******* idiots, they never learn. You're going to be a lot of fun.


The funny thing is you think I care that a troll thinks I am an idiot. Just in case you couldn't figure out who the troll is, well that would be you.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 07:35 pm
@Krumple,
Krumple wrote:

izzythepush wrote:

Keep posting. You really give me a laugh. I like ******* idiots, they never learn. You're going to be a lot of fun.


The funny thing is you think I care that a troll thinks I am an idiot. Just in case you couldn't figure out who the troll is, well that would be you.


Thanks for explaining it, I have real problems keeping up.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 07:55 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

then why do you disbelieve when people say to do so?

I don't understand your question. Would you please state it clearly? What people?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 01:19 pm
@Krumple,
maybe in Heaven we are different beings...there are things about me I don't like, and there are things about me I DO like...if I kept the things I liked and changed the bad to good, where now I am complete I WOULD be a different person but now complete.... I don't feel that the bad and the good make me who I am suppossed to be, I feel that the good is who I am supposed to be and when I do bad things...I am taking a step back and holding myself from where I am suppossed to end up as a person...people as well as myself can then see the bad and don't like it...or there opinions or my own self image changes what I and others thought about me...I don't feel that now when I do a good act the bad act was NESS. to shape my image...I feel that when I do a good act, and purely trying to be good, I like what I see, and when I do evil, I don't like what I see, and just realize I SHOULD HAVE NEVER DONE THE EVIL THING, and end up at the beginning again...I feel that if that's the case were all gray in a Toaistic outlook, oppossed to black and white like Taoism shows... I disagree with your argument you need to have that failure aspect in order to embrace the good aspect...seems like you almost have a Taoistic outlook on life...and simply put (not because I am making things up) I choose to disagree with your whole theory concept of life....I don't personally find good from a direct reaction to seeing bad...I find good, when I am striving to do good and look for good....and I find bad whenever I seek to find bad or do bad things by my choices...but in wisdom, I understand that the bad act wasn't ness. to achieve good, example: if you do bad in order to do good or see good, then people would see an evil act then EXPECT a good one here on earth which doesn't always exist...or after EVERY GOOD ACT, people could then EXPECT a BAD ONE TO FALLOW which again doesn't ALWAYS exist...

in other words...I am sitting here now, I said before I simply put disagree with your theory, to say I needed to insult you some how or do evil to come to the conclusion it would be better for me to say i simply disagree from the start like I have, doesn't add up...I have the wisdom and goodness in me to see that it is better to disagree now while I am here, and have choices between good and evil....so therefor, doing good and being ALWAYS good would COMPLETE ANYONE, ANYWHERE...
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 01:22 pm
@Brandon9000,
you told me to show you a miracle to prove what I was stating...so I said to you, if you are Atheist...why do you not go out and ask for other Atheists to show you some sort of miracle when you took your leap of faith into not believing in a God? because at SOME point in your life you decided to be Atheist....
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 01:38 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
That's an example of what is called a "double negative." You're reversing what we are asking christians to prove by reversing it to ask us the question they can't answer.

Nice try, but you don't win a kewpie doll.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 02:11 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
You're wasting your time trying to explain it. Isn't the idea of God and Heaven supposed to be beyond human comprehension? So if you or I could not comprehend it, what ******* chance has Krumple got?
tenderfoot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 10:21 pm
@izzythepush,
One thing's for sure... you and I and all the other who have no interest in Goddy thing's sure won't end up in their horror of a heaven.... aren't we bloody lucky.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 10:36 pm
@tenderfoot,
tenderfoot wrote:

One thing's for sure... you and I and all the other who have no interest in Goddy thing's sure won't end up in their horror of a heaven.... aren't we bloody lucky.


That's for sure, because it would truly be horrible for smart-ass bad boys like yourself and izzy to reside in a realm where juevenile motivations never cross a single mind.

Better to crack wise in Hell, Old Son than to put such idiocy aside in Heaven.

(With apologies to Milton)
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2011 11:10 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

You're wasting your time trying to explain it. Isn't the idea of God and Heaven supposed to be beyond human comprehension? So if you or I could not comprehend it, what ******* chance has Krumple got?
Yes, and that is why the idea of God is no idea at all... To have an idea one must have a reality with which to compare it for truth... Without that all you have is a moral form, a spiritual sense...
0 Replies
 
Krumple
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Jul, 2011 12:53 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

maybe in Heaven we are different beings...there are things about me I don't like, and there are things about me I DO like...if I kept the things I liked and changed the bad to good, where now I am complete I WOULD be a different person but now complete....


I am not even sure what this would mean. You have some idealistic view of how you want to look and if you could obtain that then you would be complete? What would that be and why wouldn't it change?

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

I don't feel that the bad and the good make me who I am suppossed to be, I feel that the good is who I am supposed to be and when I do bad things...I am taking a step back and holding myself from where I am suppossed to end up as a person...


What you are talking about here is purely subjective. Good and bad are not objective realities, they are something that gets imposed through group decision making. It has nothing to do with who you are.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

people as well as myself can then see the bad and don't like it...or there opinions or my own self image changes what I and others thought about me...I don't feel that now when I do a good act the bad act was NESS. to shape my image...I feel that when I do a good act, and purely trying to be good, I like what I see, and when I do evil, I don't like what I see, and just realize I SHOULD HAVE NEVER DONE THE EVIL THING,


I wasn't talking about "actions", I was talking about physical traits and your personality. If you really insist on talking about actions, I have no problem with that. But I was referring to something else, actions are one thing but your physical traits or personality is separate from your actions.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

and end up at the beginning again...I feel that if that's the case were all gray in a Toaistic outlook, oppossed to black and white like Taoism shows... I disagree with your argument you need to have that failure aspect in order to embrace the good aspect...seems like you almost have a Taoistic outlook on life...


I don't think you are quite understanding what I mean. I am not talking about failing, I am talking about the risk, chance, possibility of failure. When that is overcome it increases the enjoyment, pleasure, excitement.

If you were to always win and there is never a chance of failure, the enjoyment would quickly fade. An example of this would be a game.

There is this game that you play and you always win, but not because you were good at playing but because you could never lose? The only reason you win, is because there is no chance of losing, that would make the game boring, maybe not at first but over time it would. This is what I am referring to when I say heaven would become boring because you would always win, no risk of losing.

Life has meaning because we don't always win or get our way or get the result we want.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

and simply put (not because I am making things up) I choose to disagree with your whole theory concept of life....I don't personally find good from a direct reaction to seeing bad...I find good, when I am striving to do good and look for good....and I find bad whenever I seek to find bad or do bad things by my choices..


This doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me. If you don't weigh good from the bad then you would not be able to recognize good. It is because you label something bad that you recognize good and vice versa. If there was no bad, good would be unrecognizable.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

but in wisdom, I understand that the bad act wasn't ness. to achieve good, example: if you do bad in order to do good or see good, then people would see an evil act then EXPECT a good one here on earth which doesn't always exist...or after EVERY GOOD ACT, people could then EXPECT a BAD ONE TO FALLOW which again doesn't ALWAYS exist...


You have lost me here with your explanation. I don't even know where to begin to correct you. The only thing I can think is that you misunderstood what I am talking about. Let me try to say what I am not talking about.

I don't think you need to fail to obtain a enjoyable value of life. However; the treat of failure is what makes it more valuable because there is a chance that you might not succeed. It is the potential itself where value comes from and if there is no potential for failure then the value is non-existent.

We cherish love because it is rare and difficult to obtain and maintain. If it were common and there was no threat of losing it, love would not be as precious as we like to think that it is. The threat of losing love is what makes it so valuable.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

in other words...I am sitting here now, I said before I simply put disagree with your theory, to say I needed to insult you some how or do evil to come to the conclusion it would be better for me to say i simply disagree from the start like I have, doesn't add up...I have the wisdom and goodness in me to see that it is better to disagree now while I am here, and have choices between good and evil....so therefor, doing good and being ALWAYS good would COMPLETE ANYONE, ANYWHERE...


You are selectively choosing one over the other through what you have decided to be good or bad. There is no actual reality that says one is good and the other is not good. You have subjectively decided that course of action, it is neither good nor bad.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 30 Jul, 2011 01:51 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finnbarr wrote:

That's for sure, because it would truly be horrible for smart-ass bad boys like yourself and izzy to reside in a realm where juevenile motivations never cross a single mind.


If you actually bother to check my posts, you will notice that I've been rather respectful of Spademaster's posts. It's obvious he is genuine, and is more concerned with the real Jesus, not some slobbering far right nutjob's twisted interpretation of scripture. If there is a Heaven it will be full of genuine Christians like him, not the hate mongers of the religious right who have twisted Christ's message out of all recognition.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Jul, 2011 03:08 pm
@Krumple,
To the degree that good and bad are subjective perceptions, I agree.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Jul, 2011 09:35 pm
@izzythepush,
Well then blame Tenderfoot, because he certainly found reason to consider you a kindred soul...and I saw no objection from you.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/29/2025 at 03:43:43