@hawkeye10,
Not boycotting them...YET! All the facts are not in. I will not allow myself to be a 'prisoner-of-the-moment'.
While I have no sympathy at all for any lack-a-daisical safety or maint. skimpers, I feel Southwest right now is in the moment in media cross-hairs after this safety incident. Lucky for all concerned there were no deaths.
Before calling for a consumer boycott, it's wise to allow some perspective and let all the facts to surface.
I feel that the whole industry at times has been guilty of this sort of cost-cutting, depending on the economy. Many airlines in the past have been caught in the cross-hairs. As a result of investigations and bad press, some even went out of business. I don't need to search far or wide to find the names of other major and minor airlines who have had similar issues with various degrees of evasion.
This being said, I've no relative or friends that work for Southwest. I've flown them about a half dozen times and think their flight service is above avg and their on-time record is above avg (plus or mins 10 mins). This is an ugly incident and others are not exemplary, by any means; however, United, American, etc, have had their problems. They fly 737s too, do they not? Is Southwest's record with these planes far worse than industry avg?
"A total of 931 Boeing 737-300s are operated by all airlines worldwide, with 288 of them in the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration said earlier."
However, the focus ALSO should be placed on our wonderful Federal gov't (FAA) as their record has bad in the more distant past keeping the skies safe. In some cases, FAA allows antiquated and overloaded Air Traffic Control equipment and over- whlemed Controllers. That is another place where I'd like to see the pressure applied.
However, I understand that in the recent years considering the quantity of airline miles have been high, airlines have had less fatalities than ever before.