1
   

If the U.N. Votes a "no fly" zone over here, whatawedo ??

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
Reply Mon 28 Mar, 2011 11:11 pm

If the U.N. Votes a "no fly" zone over here, whatawedo ??
I doubt there is jurisdiction to overthrow a country
that the UN dislikes. If there IS, we shoud repeal that real fast.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 647 • Replies: 15

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 28 Mar, 2011 11:28 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
That would be rather interesting, since the USA had to agree to such Smile
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Mar, 2011 11:33 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Good point.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 02:59 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
That would be rather interesting, since the USA had to agree to such Smile
Yeah, that 's right.
I forgot about the American veto.

It coud only happen if we were absent,
like the Russians when the Korean War began.

What if a no - fly zone were declared here
by the General Assembly of UN,
where we have no veto ?





David
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 03:09 am
@OmSigDAVID,
The general assembly doesn't have that authority. Frustrating to try to pick a fight and not have anyone show up, huh?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 03:30 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
The general assembly doesn't have that authority.
Yeah, but it can happen by USURPATION of ultra vires fraudulent authority.
That happens ofen enuf already both in our federal and state governments.



Setanta wrote:
Frustrating to try to pick a fight and not have anyone show up, huh?
That happens a lot,
but I get to choose my own responsive emotion.

I choose a better one than frustration.





David
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 03:34 am
@OmSigDAVID,
What is that you choose, then? Retreat into fantasy?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 03:43 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
What is that you choose, then? Retreat into fantasy?
No, its better to REMEMBER something good,
like the falls of nazism and of communism and of gun control, as it proceeds apace.

Thay make me happy.





David
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 03:44 am
@Setanta,
I, for one , enjoy taking the train, so itll be no **** off my travel plans.
I wish you well Davis, even though you are sometimes batty as a ball park.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 03:47 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
I, for one, enjoy taking the train, so itll be no **** off my travel plans.
I wish you well Davis, even though you are sometimes batty as a ball park.
Thanx for the well wishes.

Note that I have no interest in ball games,
nor their parks.





David
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2011 10:42 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
I wish we hadent gotten involved, and I wish we could get out of afghanastan and Iraq. And Im getting damn tired of the republican appologists claiming Bush made Iraq into a democratic country!
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Mar, 2011 03:44 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
I wish we hadent gotten involved, and I wish we could get out of afghanastan and Iraq.
And Im getting damn tired of the republican appologists claiming Bush made Iraq into a democratic country!
I am a Republican, but not an apologist,
who is pleased that W got rid of Saddam.

When he declared: "mission accomplished!" and liberal scorned him,
he was RIGHT, it WAS accomplished because we removed Saddam
and his kin. That was our mission.
Accordingly, he shoud have then brought our troops home from Iraq.
I wish that he had.





David
RABEL222
 
  0  
Reply Wed 30 Mar, 2011 10:31 am
@OmSigDAVID,
But he sure as hell dident. Instead he tried to nation build, something that never works. We should have learned from vietnaum!
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Mar, 2011 10:44 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
But he sure as hell dident. Instead he tried to nation build, something that never works. We should have learned from vietnaum!
Our mission was to get rid of SADDAM.
He shoud have brought back the troops when that mission was ACCOMPLISHED.


BOTH parties were and are complicit
in continuing funding.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Mar, 2011 12:07 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Simple - we drive.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Mar, 2011 03:47 pm
@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:
Simple - we drive.
See, I was raising the issue
of American SOVEREIGNTY.

The UN is NOT the boss; we owe it nothing.





David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » If the U.N. Votes a "no fly" zone over here, whatawedo ??
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 06:56:38
▲ ▼