Are you against Christian Sharia Law?

See my above posts. (Jesus is God, the second person of the Trinity.)

Well, Palin sympathizers updated Paul Revere's Wikipedia page with her version of events - fortunately these changes were soon deleted.

That's nice, but that has nothing to do with anything.

God came to earth to earth as a man. God in the flesh.

Do you have any problem with that?

Then why did you post it five or six times?

You know, bubby, that you are a 'telltale.'

It only comes down to reading one your posts to see the subject and who is the target of your poorly conceived crap. I guess we should all be grateful you suffer from chronic diarrhea, in virtual space it easy to clean all that loose sh*t up.

Here's laughing at you, bubby.

Rap

I have no problem with - everyone can believe what she/he wants to believe (everyone must find her/his salvation in her/his own way).

But actually that's not what Catholics, Orthodox, Anglicans ... believe. And since you were reputedly referring to the Catholic catechism, said, your knowledge of Catholicism was better than mine and that of a Cardinal ...

Because a few weeks ago you didn't know that your church believes Jesus is God in the flesh. Glad to see you've come around. I commend you for being teachable and having an open mind to the truth.

It's in the Catechism, Walter. It's just not in words that you recognize. That's why I gave you the Catholic Encyclopedia so you could see it there also.

I've read it in the original Latin version, compared it to the English, French and German translations - nothing like it there.

A Cardinal, professor at a Vatican university, member of the Holy See's "Pontifical Council for the Laity", member of the Holy See's "Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace" etc confirmed me in that above opinion.

What is your reputation that you're here more knowledgeable than what is written in the Catechism? What is taught be church leaders and theological professors?

You, someone who doesn't know what 'trinity' is. (And means - as you prove here over and over again.)

Let me help you Walter.

You agree Jesus is God, the Father is God and the Holy Spirit is God. You also agree that God came to earth in Jesus, yet you have a problem with jesus being God in the flesh.

I don't think the problem is on this side.

Surprisingly, but of course without naming it, you are now adopting the trinity theory.

And didn't read my previous posts.

Walter, I have never denied the trinity. I believe in the trinity. This may be just a communication problem.

That's funny - especially, because you had had this discussion not only with me.

Oh, I see .... communication problems. I hope, you solved them.

Yes, Walter. I solved them. It seems you are missing something here. I believe in the trinity. We agree. The Catholic church teaches Jesus is God. We agree. The Catholic church also teaches Jesus is God in the flesh and I agree with that. You disagree. That means you disagree with your church and I agree with your church. You are the one who doesn't agree with your own church. Not me.

I can't make it any simpler.

Jesus is God AND human.

Quote a single source (by a Council, encyclical, or similar 'official' [like Catechism]) which says different.

Jesus himself said: "If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I." (John 14, 28) Meaning that's he's weak as a human being ....

Correct. I agree. Jesus is God in flesh. Same thing. Like I said, we had a communication problem.

Sure Rap did, and he answered to your question of what her sins were. His answer was from discussions in a formal religious setting too. In other words what the church discussed with it's members.


RD, you're the one struggling with indoctrination and education. Your pride is keeping you from admitting the shallow depth of understanding you have on these topics. Plenty of people here have more biblical, and koranic knowledge than you, but for some reason, you believe you know the most on thee topics. That you can't own up to being corrected repeatedly, speaks to your indoctrination.


I can do both. I directly counter your points, and since you assert such authority on all topics, I'd like to know your background with them. What are your sources? The American Thinker? Thinking for you, so you don't have to.


Unless it reinforces your world view. Perhaps this is why you stay in the safe waters of the American Thinker where you'll never have to challenge your narrow view on these topics.


No need to get so defensive RD.


What does this phrase mean to you? It seems like marketing. You do not express compassion, but hatred for others. It's unflattering.

A
R
T

Rap is a joke. You keep chipping away. I'm gonna be around for a long time.