@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
It's your opinion that my sources are "right wing propaganda". I have no problem with your opinion. This is a forum where all views are allowed. At least I hope that is the policy. Any other policy would be very un-American.
I never said you had to accept my sources, yet you still keep repeating it. Perhaps you simply have a problem with any view that opposes yours. Would that be a correct assessment?
1 - I'm not saying you can't post anything. You can post outright lies, it doesn't matter. You're entitled to believe any non-scientific idea that cones into your head. Be my guest.
2 - by virtue of what you accept, and what you reject, conclusions about your standards of evaluation may be drawn. You demonstrate a preference for right wing political dogma, and have a distaste for peer reviewed science.
In evaluating your posts, it then seems to be a reasonable conclusion that appealing to fact based rational arguments will not be very potent with you since you only seem to care about what right wing bloggers think about these topics. I don't think you would accept any source contrary to your beliefs. That is not intellectually honest. You diminish your own credibility.
Again, I can't force you to be intellectually honest. Im only point out your contradictions, which is well within my ability and interest.
A
R
T
